The history of success for 6-man rotations isn't too extensive, the latest attempted failure being the Mets. After defending the 6-man experiment for the first couple months and dealing with the managerial angsting, the internal pissing and moaning and the external second-guessing, here's what Terry Colllins had to say about the 6-man: Funny stufff by Collins, I think I could be persuaded to pull for the Mets in the NL in the postseason. Meanwhile, back to the Twins, this sounds more like a game of 5-seated musical chairs... the music is bound to stop for someone. Hughes, Duffey, and especially Pelfrey, are all major question marks as to their level of effectiveness going into the stretch run. I like your thinking about Santana, though. The Twins talk about resting young and tired arms, but Santana doesn't need any rest, skip another Duffey/Pelfrey turn if either is ineffective. Under the current 6-man set-up, Santana would pitch in Game 162 to close out the season.vs. Kansas City I'd rather he get one extra start before then, thus setting him up for throwing in Game 159 on October 1 vs. Cleveland, and setting him up for a possible Game 163 one-game playoff start, or helping to clinch the wild card in a relief role on short rest in game 162, on October 4 vs. the aforementioned Royals.