Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    42,479

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    471

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. ashbury
    My bonehead-simple remedy, mentioned in the game thread, would be to add a rising four-seamer to his arsenal. The way batters were lunging at the low pitches to spoil them, it seemed to me they had no respect for the heater upstairs. Is that something he's not capable of, even judiciously used? Maybe it can't be his out pitch, but can set the out pitch up.
  2. ashbury
    The runner going to third had basically stopped in his tracks before he had passed Adrianza. / edit - ninja'd, and by actual evidence, to boot
  3. ashbury
    I thought his control was OK. Concur.
  4. ashbury
    Being on the 40-man now does this. The only way he can be Rule-5 eligible again is if he passes through waivers, a much less demanding way for another team to take him.
  5. ashbury
    "I went to read a roster move story on TD, and a Game Thread broke out."
  6. ashbury
    My takeaway is that other teams have prospects giving great performances too, and more numerously in some cases. I don't think our prospects are so remarkably young for their league levels, overall, as to explain it all away. Many "average age" numbers below AAA are inflated by the career minor leaguers necessary to flesh out full rosters for the benefit of genuine prospects.
  7. ashbury
    Does that speak to the pitcher's craftiness, or to the manager not putting him in when a run would matter?
  8. ashbury
    Also, Kohl probably envies those who are wrathful.
  9. ashbury
    Some pitchers' sole purpose in life on earth is to be shown up by their manager.
  10. ashbury
    Looks like he's going to have to settle for Envy as his cardinal sin for this game.
  11. ashbury
    It's been a good couple of innings but let's wait and see. Innings eating is more than that.
  12. ashbury
    I'm partial to the structure of home runs.
  13. ashbury
    What's your plan for that 5th chance? A home run every time?
  14. ashbury
    No doubt we'll soon see Rochester trading away veterans like Andy WIlkins and Ryne Harper to the likes of Toledo and Indianapolis, for prospects, before the next trading deadline.
  15. ashbury
    It is amazing what baseball-reference.com will tell you if you ask it courteously.
  16. ashbury
    Eleven five-year olds would be too much for me, to say nothing of 21. I'm not ruthless enough. An average one weighs 40-50 pounds so 11 of them total about 500. Unless I cold-cock several of them within the first few seconds, they will swarm and overwhelm me. My mistake would be to try, "doesn't anyone want to pet this puppy?" And then down I go, Gulliver-style. I have nothing to add to Tom's fine baseball answers.
  17. ashbury
    The balls Rosario hits worst are the ones right down the middle? That's our Eddie!
  18. ashbury
    There's no reason to cast aspersions on another member like that. But yes, MLB's site has Gonsalves on the 40-man. http://m.twins.mlb.com/roster/40-man Looks as if ESPN's list is in error, missing lots of names and consisting basically of the 25-man plus a couple of guys in transition to/from AAA - I didn't inspect closely.
  19. ashbury
    It's a question of room on the 40-man (for either pickup) versus room all season on the 25-man. To me that's a pretty big gap, especially considering that only one bottom feeder out of all 29 other teams needs to find a way to make room on their 40. Again, if he's taken, it may not be a big loss to us. I was just responding to the notion that since he wasn't drafted last winter, no one would claim him now.
  20. ashbury
    Since I pointed to July 22 as a date where buy/sell decisions might start to get serious as opposed to contingency planning, note that last year the Twins record after the game on that date was 49-47. Garcia was acquired two days later. I'm not bothered by different FO responses to different scenarios. We're probably using "die is cast" in different senses. Until late July, I look at it as only contingency planning. There's no hard and fast date - it's until the paperwork for a first trade is signed.
  21. ashbury
    That was my reaction. I simply have no way of guessing whether ESan's remark crosses a line or not. The same words could have a different impact, depending on a dozen individual factors in that particular clubhouse. I'm not there, regardless of whether I'm qualified to judge or not. This is one of a manager's primary jobs, to gauge this and a thousand other things that get said or done over the course of a season, and take decisive steps, or subtle steps, in the rare case he deems it necessary - or, more likely, do nothing. Molitor, Glynn, etc, have seen it all by now. As a fan, I'll merely note this instance, and remember it if some kind of fallout occurs in a week or two. It probably falls in the large category of "do nothing".
  22. ashbury
    Note that it's much easier for another team to take him via waivers than to take him via Rule-5. The fact he wasn't drafted last off-season doesn't mean there is zero interest by some other teams. The FO will need to be very sure, if they were to take this step. Hopefully, a minor trade, or a bigger trade with him as a component or even sweetener, could be done in preference.
  23. ashbury
    This is a very fair counterpoint to 48-56. The die was not cast, until the moment Escobar was traded. (And how pathetic is it, if trading your super-sub utility infielder is what constitutes raising the white flag of surrender?) But trades don't happen overnight, and decisions to raise that white flag even less so. Escobar's trade on July 27 happened to come at an awkward moment, following a four game winning streak. But, on July 22 the team's record was 44-53, and I'm going to infer that it was on this date or shortly afterward that the front office put their stake in the ground and decided the plug was to be pulled. Several trade discussions no doubt had to be put into high gear before the first one was signed. We fans can't look at July 27 as a simple go/no-go date. 44-53 looms large, to me. (And how pathetic is it, if 44-53 followed by 48-53, followed by 48-56, constitutes differences in how the team's chances at post-season play are viewed?)
  24. ashbury
    Blake Snell struck him out on July 12. They sent Astudillo back down to AAA after that.
  25. ashbury
    I mostly agree, but with one quibble (which I boldfaced) that a sunk cost is a sunk cost whether it's time or money, and you can't get it back no matter which way you decide how to go forward. But your statement is close. Kohl has enough experience by now (drafted at 18 and he'll be 24 next season) that he's either about ready to make it, or probably never will be. So, it's time. Of course, same can be said for a teammate named Stephen......
×
×
  • Create New...