Is there... like, data or something for that? Because if you're asserting that it's true on an intuitive level, that's questionable at the very best. Mr. Brooks raises a couple of pretty strong arguments against the idea that RF doesn't represent a higher injury risk for Sano, and my guess is that there might be others. At any rate, the defense here at TD of the Twins' forced position change of Sano has been an interesting one, coming as it does on the heels of several years of the fairly common, seemingly almost reflexive shooting down of outside-the-box ideas put forth by some posters during the lean times that the Twins attempt in order to put a better team on the field. 'Players aren't Roto cards or Xbox avatars, you can't just shuffle them around to different positions and/ or different teams like they are' was how the argument went, or words to that effect. Much was made of how there are egos, comfort levels, franchise good will, and a boatload of other intangibles to consider, in addition to the more tangible variables like, in the case of position change, defense. But now Sano is charging around right field like a near-sighted rhino when he's not being a mess at the plate, Kyle Schwarber's left ACL is shredded, and, thanks in part to both injuries and the Sano move, the Twins are currently the proud owners of zero reserve infielders capable of playing anywhere but first. So how much more has to happen before the 'Players aren't Roto cards' rule applies to the Twins coaching staff and front office, and not just to TD 'dreamers'?