Well, Dozier also had a breakout in 2011 so he has shown that he can hit. The difference to me is that Plouffe basically broke out for 30-45 days in 2012 whereas Dozier has posted a .700+ OPS for 90+ days. When you start to creep past the two month mark, pitchers have adjusted and if the hitter is still getting results, that means their adjustments aren't working. Also, Dozier finally looks like the player advertised through the minors. He's showing good discipline (never Plouffe's strong point), making contact (again, not Plouffe's strong point), and has a solid, though unspectacular, glove. The only surprising thing is his power, which is why I'm not comfortable saying he's an .800+ OPS player going forward. Dozier looked like a lost player in 2012. He didn't have good bat control like he did in the minors, he didn't show any discipline like he did in the minors, and his hands/footwork were awful (again, unlike the minors). I think he was overwhelmed and it basically destroyed every aspect of his game. I don't see that with Plouffe. I'm still hopeful that Trevor will become a good starter going forward but given his defensive struggles, rumblings that the front office doesn't care for him much, and his player profile of "streaky, but powerful", I hold much less hope of him becoming a regular player than I do Brian Dozier. I think he's a prime candidate for platoon duty at the minimum, though.