To be clear, I stated multiple times that Perkins should not be offered in trade, not that he shouldn't be traded if someone approaches you with a blockbuster deal. Several people have suggested that he should be put on the open market. I don't agree. There's a significant perception difference between those two things. If a GM calls you and blows you out of the water, you listen to him (in fact, I said just that earlier in either this thread or the Trade Percentages thread). It never hurts to listen to someone talk. But to openly dangle Perkins on the market after he just signed a team-friendly deal to stay in the home town he grew up in, a community he and his wife have embraced with their charitable work? That's a slap in the face. Of course, all of this hinges on talking to Perkins first. If he's okay with it, then obviously it's okay but I don't believe it's good business to treat your best employees badly just to get a leg up on the competition. To me, it's completely irrelevant whether Perkins makes $20m a year or $20,000 a year. He made a decision based on more than money and that should be respected, even if it only means you keep that guy in the conversation and let him know what's happening.