Except they're not. You're using small numbers to make them look small without applying scale. .5% is, at minimum, 150% higher than the upper end of flu rates, which you referenced as .2%. Assuming those rates, which you're basically just making up, means that 2.5 people die of COVID-19 for every single person that dies of the flu. And that's your best case scenario. Never mind that infection rates cannot be left out of this conversation because humans have been fighting the flu for millennia. We have natural immunities plus a solid vaccination system that prevents people from getting sick in the first place. Start stacking these things on top of each other and the typical 30,000 flu deaths a year could reach 500,000+ COVID-19 deaths without things even going unexpectedly badly. And that's why I want everyone here, and I mean everyone, to stop equating this virus to the flu. That argument is used solely to minimize the danger of COVID-19. While I welcome discussion about how to move forward, it's time to squash bad, flawed comparisons that do not hold up to what any experts, scientists, or doctors are telling us about this virus.