Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Will Twins Pitching Coach Pete Maki Be the Fall Guy?

    Minnesota's pitching problems go well beyond one coach, but after three seasons of mixed results, Pete Maki's tenure deserves serious scrutiny.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Matt Krohn-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    There were plenty of changes coming to the Minnesota Twins last winter. The front office changed. The manager changed. Much of the coaching staff changed. The organization entered the 2026 season determined to take a different direction after consecutive second-half collapses.

    One of the few members of the major-league coaching staff who survived that purge was pitching coach Pete Maki. That decision made sense. Maki has been with the organization since 2017, initially working as the minor-league pitching coordinator before joining the major-league staff as bullpen coach in 2021. When Wes Johnson left during the 2022 season, Maki took over as pitching coach.

    But as the Twins' 2026 season has unfolded, it's fair to ask whether Maki should survive another organizational reset. That isn't an indictment of one person. Pitching coaches don't determine the talent available to them. They don't control injuries. They don't decide which pitchers are acquired, developed, promoted, or designated for assignment. Eventually, though, results have to dictate decisions.

    Unfavorable Circumstances

    Maki entered this season with one enormous problem before Opening Day even arrived. Pablo López was lost to Tommy John surgery, removing the Twins' most established starting pitcher from the equation. Suddenly, Maki was tasked with helping several young pitchers navigate major league rotations while simultaneously trying to construct a bullpen without an established closer or proven setup man.

    That is a difficult assignment for any pitching coach. The Twins cycled through young starters, reclamation projects and inexperienced relievers. Injuries created additional complications with players like Mick Abel, David Festa, Cole Sands, and Anthony Banda. The organization also asked pitchers who had spent relatively little time in the majors to take on increasingly important roles.

    There were going to be growing pains. Still, there have been some legitimate successes.

    Positive Signs

    Taj Bradley is probably the clearest example. Bradley leads the Twins' pitching staff in rWAR and owns the highest strikeout rate among the team's starting pitchers. Considering the number of young arms Minnesota has relied upon, watching Bradley establish himself as the staff's most valuable pitcher is an important development.

    Then there is Yoendrys Gómez. The Twins made relatively small adjustments to Gómez's release and pitch mix, and the results were significant enough to turn him into one of the team's most important bullpen pieces during the first half. Gómez essentially became the pitcher the Twins needed when there wasn't an obvious answer for the ninth inning. His ability to absorb important innings kept the bullpen together for stretches of the season. Those developments deserve credit.

    Inconsistent Results

    Other pitchers provide a more complicated picture. Connor Prielipp took on a significantly larger workload than he had previously handled, reaching a career high in innings. That is an important developmental milestone for a young pitcher. But the results weren't particularly good. For the season, Prielipp has a -0.3 rWAR, an 80 ERA+, and a -1.70 WPA, illustrating just how much his innings hurt the Twins. 

    Andrew Morris offers another example. For a while, Morris looked like he had the potential to become a dominant setup option. The Twins appeared to have found another important bullpen piece. Then things unraveled down the stretch with his second-half OPS allowed rising by over 150 points. Morris ultimately sits with a -1.14 WPA, turning what looked like a potential success story into another question mark.

    And then there is Simeon Woods Richardson. Woods Richardson was once viewed as one of the organization's promising young starting pitchers. Instead, he became effectively unplayable (-1.3 rWAR) and eventually was lost on waivers. That is a particularly difficult development for a coaching and development staff to explain.

    Numbers are Difficult to Ignore

    The bigger concern isn't necessarily one pitcher. It is the overall trend. Since 2024, Twins pitchers rank 25th in MLB in WPA and 25th in ERA. They rank 26th in Barrel% and 20th in home runs allowed per nine innings. Those aren't numbers that can simply be dismissed as a bad month or an unfortunate stretch.

    There is certainly a personnel component. A pitching coach can only work with the pitchers the organization gives him. If the front office doesn't provide enough major league-caliber arms, no pitching coach is going to turn a collection of replacement-level pitchers into an elite staff.

    The Twins have also dealt with significant injuries. López missed most of 2026. Other pitchers have cycled in and out of the rotation. The bullpen has lacked stability. All of that matters. But the results have been bad, and they have continued to be bad.

    At some point, the organization has to determine whether the problem is primarily personnel or whether its pitching development and coaching processes aren't producing enough improvement.

    Not Everything Shows Up in the Numbers

    There is another side of this discussion that shouldn't be ignored. Being a pitching coach is about much more than ERA, strikeout rate or WPA.

    Maki is responsible for building relationships with pitchers, preparing them for starts, helping relievers prepare for unpredictable workloads, communicating with the manager and front office, identifying mechanical issues, studying opposing hitters and helping pitchers make adjustments. Some of the most important work happens behind closed doors. 

    A pitcher might credit a coach for helping him make a mechanical adjustment that doesn't immediately show up in his statistics. A young player might develop confidence because of the relationship he has built with his coach. A struggling pitcher might avoid a complete collapse because someone on the staff knows how to reach him.

    None of that appears on a leaderboard. It would be unfair to evaluate Maki exclusively through the team's pitching statistics. It would also be unfair to ignore those statistics entirely.

    Is Maki the Fall Guy?

    The Twins don't need to make Maki the scapegoat for their pitching problems. But they do need to evaluate him honestly. Maki has been the organization's major league pitching coach since 2022. He has now had multiple seasons to establish his system, work with the organization's pitchers and help shape the development of young arms.

    There have been successes. There have also been too many failures. If the Twins believe the problem is simply a lack of talent, then the solution should be improving the talent around Maki. If they believe the pitching infrastructure is working but injuries and roster construction have undermined it, then Maki deserves another opportunity.

    If, however, the organization believes its pitchers aren't improving enough under the current system, then changing the pitching coach should be part of the conversation.

    That doesn't mean Maki is a bad coach. It means the Twins need to decide whether he is the right coach for what comes next. The organization is already facing plenty of difficult questions this offseason. The pitching staff will be one of the biggest. Pete Maki should be one of them.


    Should Maki be on the hot seat this winter? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    46 minutes ago, thelanges5 said:

    We’ve fired Rocco, bench coaches, hitting coaches, 3rd base coaches and we have the same results. Time to move on from some of these players. 

    Who, from the 2023 team will still be on the roster next year?
    Lopez, Ryan, Ober, Buxton. That's... probably about it.

    Who are we moving on from?

    12 hours ago, #3Killer said:

    Not in complete agreement with this. Our starters and relievers lack consistency very badly. That should be an issue coaches can deal with. Glad you mentioned LaTroy- I get it that he is a local favorite but the blame for inconsistent relievers needs to be on him. This whole team needs to step up its game- so up and down!!!!

    A lot of that, IMO, has to do with experience.   I think they have done phenomenal, if you look at where they started.  

     

    7 hours ago, Hawkeye Bean Counter said:

    Seriously, so we are just in the change for change sake? We came into the season down a pitcher and no bullpen. We have rebuilt a bullpen on the fly. SWR cratered, Obers velocity is vanishing, yet he had promising progress with Abel and Bradley is a win.  He is not getting fired. 

    My “no participation trophies” comment was about the prior commenter wanting to give Maki a raise. He hasn’t earned a raise. I never actually said I wanted to fire Maki, but if they do, I can absolutely see why.

    The rotation has under performed expectations. Pre-season projections after Pablo injuries had them a top third rotation, they’re a bottom 5 staff.
     

    The bullpen that started the season as unserious, received 3 huge upgrades at the deadline and is still a bottom 5 bullpen.

    the rotation was supposed to be the strength of the team, and it was almost as weak as the bullpen. Every team uses 8-10 different starters per year, that’s the average.

    14 hours ago, soyouresayingtheresachance said:

    Somebody needs to be the fall guy, I guess.

    But it seems more like an organizational problem. The minor league levels are filled with high ERAs and poor performance. Rarely, if ever, do we have a pitcher debut looking ready to be in the ML. 

    If we need a fall guy, just release Pablo Lopez because he was injured all year.  Or just release the owners for allowing the trade of all the good bullpen arms at one time last year. How ridiculous would that be? We don't have near enough information to form reasonable opinions about this topic. Too many variables at play here.

    If there is to be a blame game, I would put it on the trainers.  Too many strains and pains.  An off-season training program needs to be monitored.  More emphasis needs to be on endurance conditioning, Blyleven used to run and nothing else (Ryan can't even make it past the All Star break).  Less weights, more flexibility; too many lat, hammy, shoulder, and lower back strains.  All can be prevented.  We need to be much more proactive.  It frustrates me that when there is an injury, they never address the root cause, which always leads to a setback, or a repeat.   

    12 hours ago, DocBauer said:

    And on a personal level, I haven't fully decided if he should be fired yet. Does he deserve an opportunity to prove himself? 

    When Zoll was elevated to the top spot, it was really the only option with spring training about to start.

    But now Tom P. has had time to assess him and not just this past year.  He has been a major part of the front office for the last 6 years and with the team for the last 10 years.  I can't believe Falvey made every decision on his own and didn't rely on Zoll, even Falvey alluded that he has in the past.

    So now we have had one playoff win in the last 10 years and sub .500 teams struggling at the end of the season the last 3 years.  Do you really want to give Zoll time to prove himself, when the track record of what he has been a major part of is not good.  For me I would prefer someone who has proven themselves, if they want to keep Zoll as the number 2, not what I would do but I could live with it.  This organization needs a review from top to bottom of what they are doing well and what is not working because something is not clicking.  And typically the best option to do this for any organization in any industry is with new voices.

    3 hours ago, Richie the Rally Goat said:

    My “no participation trophies” comment was about the prior commenter wanting to give Maki a raise. He hasn’t earned a raise. I never actually said I wanted to fire Maki, but if they do, I can absolutely see why.

    The rotation has under performed expectations. Pre-season projections after Pablo injuries had them a top third rotation, they’re a bottom 5 staff.
     

    The bullpen that started the season as unserious, received 3 huge upgrades at the deadline and is still a bottom 5 bullpen.

    the rotation was supposed to be the strength of the team, and it was almost as weak as the bullpen. Every team uses 8-10 different starters per year, that’s the average.

    After Pablo was injured,  top 1/3 rotation?  Where?      I was seeing middle to back of the pack.   Ryan, Ober, Bradley have all had pretty good seasons.  Kremer has been at least a solid 3-4 while he has been here.  I see no where for the season where they think our starters have been a bottom 5 staff.    

    We added to significant assets to the bullpen -  Hoffman and then to a lesser extent and shorter time frame, Minter.    Now the last month Morris is falling back to reality (or tipping pitches) and statistically Minter is coming back down - but we are also utilizing him a lot more than he has been used in the past.  

    Bullpen as currently constructed I would say is in the 18-22 but that is just purely guessing at this point. 

    I really think you are over estimated what this team was.   For pitching staff - starters were a strength after injuries middle of the pack.  That seems about right.  Relief pitchers - worse in the league - now in the 18-23 range.  Hitters - below average.   

    To start the season the hitters outperformed with runs scored,   bullpen struggled early,   starters have been fairly consistent.   Middle of the season hitters went on a tear scoring runs,  Bullpen seemed to greatly outperform.  Starting pitching was holding their own.  To end the season with a tougher schedule,  all 3 phases are underperforming in my opinion for the talent.  Granted some injuries.   

    The problem with Maki is that it took over a 120 games to make changes with the SPs prep so they could get thru the first inning without giving up runs. They would also be 20 to 30 pitches in going into the 2nd inning. It put the team at a disadvantage to have to get back in the game early. He is not at fault for the injury problems or the BPs up and downs because of the gutting that took place last year. That issue wasn't addressed in the off season and having to go to the waiver wire took time. 

    Again as I have said before Falvey and Levine were brought in to build a pitching pipeline that never happened. The majority of the pitching staff are do to trades made. It's time to draft and develop pitching in house. That doesn't mean a couple of arm's that means drafting numerous arm's and with good coaching get them ready for the show.

    Seems like the Twins had a very nice bullpen about a year and a half ago thanks to Maki. Then they chose to blow it up, then not invest in any help this year. So I fail to see how that is Maki's fault.

    Having said that I have no idea what metrics they might use to evaluate a pitching coach's effectiveness, so there's that, too 

    8 hours ago, twinsfansd said:

    Seems like the Twins had a very nice bullpen about a year and a half ago thanks to Maki. Then they chose to blow it up, then not invest in any help this year. So I fail to see how that is Maki's fault.

    Having said that I have no idea what metrics they might use to evaluate a pitching coach's effectiveness, so there's that, too 

    He gets a gold star for creating a functional bullpen out of glue and duct tape. We traded our top 5 relievers. We preceeded to spend a whopping $2 million on Rogers and 500k of international money on Banda. Later we traded, Agbayani and Amick for Minter - Amick has considerable strike out concerns but continues to rake even at AAA, that one might hurt a little.  Hoffman for Dasan Hill. This was a significant trade.  Hoffman is starting to find his control since coming over and has elite potential.  Otherwise cash or minor prospects for Gomez, Nance, Acton and Orze.  
     

    Even still for zero money invested and a young volatile arm and a bat that’s best outcome is Joey Gallo light.  In return for the bullpen we traded we have - Bradley, Abel, Tait, Rojas, Roden and Horn.  Now we really need to spend a little more on the bullpen and continuing to develop younger arms. Morris is struggling to end the season either wearing out or tipping pitches. Adding 1 more elite arm to Hoffman and Gomez would leave us in a really good situation for next year.  




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...