Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    There's No Path to a Passing Grade for Twins' Offseason Moves


    Cody Christie

    Some front offices have been very active this winter, while the Twins’ front office has sat on the sidelines and let the market play out. Looking ahead, there is no path to a passing grade for the Twins’ offseason moves. 

     

    Image courtesy of Brad Rempel-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    As the offseason unfolds, national outlets are rolling out their early grades for teams based on winter transactions. For the Minnesota Twins, however, it’s hard to envision any scenario where the front office emerges with a passing grade. Ownership-imposed payroll limitations and the reality of subtracting value via free-agent departures and likely salary dumps (while gaining little in return) paint a bleak picture for the weeks leading to spring training.

    The Twins are staring down a challenging decision-making process. Key players like Christian Vázquez, Chris Paddack, and Willi Castro are all on expiring, moderately expensive contracts. Minnesota’s current payroll projects are in the neighborhood of $140 million, and the ownership group would like that total to be closer to $130 million. Trading one or more of these players seems likely, but the return is expected to be underwhelming. None of these pieces are the kind of players who command top-tier prospects or impact talent in a deal. Yet, dealing them would weaken the team’s depth, which this front office highly values.

    Take Vázquez, for example. The veteran catcher was brought in to stabilize the position and guide the pitching staff. Trading him would leave the Twins heavily reliant on Ryan Jeffers, who has struggled with consistency in the past. Minnesota has added some catching depth this winter by trading for Diego Cartaya. However, Minnesota has employed an even split of playing time behind the plate in recent seasons, and it's not clear that Cartaya would be a viable backstop for 75-plus games. 

    Similarly, trading Paddack or Castro removes insurance from an already injury-prone rotation and lineup. If Paddack is dealt, Simeon Woods Richardson or David Festa will slide into the fifth spot in the rotation, which might be an upgrade over Paddack—but would reduce their resiliency in case of an injury. Castro’s value comes from his defensive versatility, but the Twins might be able to use someone like Austin Martin or Michael Helman in a utility role. These are calculated risks, but they only make sense if the front office believes some other players on the roster can take a step forward.

    Could Minnesota swing for a bigger deal to alter the trajectory of their offseason? The possibility exists, but it’s not without significant risk. Trading from the young core would be a gamble. The candidates for such a move—Royce Lewis, first and foremost—represent not only the future but also the present hope of sustainable success. The organization has one of baseball’s best farm systems, and prospects like Emmanuel Rodriguez or Marco Raya could be used as trade chips. However, depleting the pipeline has long-term consequences that the Twins have historically avoided.

    It’s not as if this front office is incapable of pulling off a win-now move. The trade of Luis Arraez for Pablo López is a shining example from two years ago. That deal worked out as close to ideally as the front office could hope, with López anchoring the rotation and signed to a long-term deal with the club. But those kinds of trades are exceedingly rare. It would take another masterstroke for the Twins to escape this offseason unscathed.

    On paper, Minnesota might already have the best roster in the AL Central, which some fans might find hard to believe after last year’s collapse. There are no glaring holes on the roster, and they have depth at multiple positions. Many of Minnesota’s top prospects finished last season at Double-A or higher, putting them on a path to debut in 2025. The challenge now is returning to 2023’s level of success, while working within financial constraints. This roster can compete if healthy, but health has been anything but a guarantee for this franchise.

    The reality is that the Twins’ front office is operating in a nearly impossible situation. Any significant subtraction will hurt the team’s chances in 2024, while any addition seems unlikely to move the needle enough to justify the cost. Grading this offseason will be about context, but the final marks won't be kind, even understanding the challenges.

    Derek Falvey and Jeremy Zoll must walk a tightrope in the weeks ahead. Their decisions will shape not only the 2025 season, but also the perception of this regime’s ability to build a contender under constraints. No matter what they do, it’s hard to see a path to a grade above a C for this offseason. The pieces don’t fit, the math doesn’t work, and the Twins are left in the unenviable position of trying to tread water while the rest of baseball races ahead.


    What grade has the front office gotten for the offseason so far? Leave a comment and start the discussion. 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    15 minutes ago, Greglw3 said:

    If you think that his most recent season is less predictive of the season to follow than past seasons, you may have a point. I’ve seen many late bloomers over my decades of following baseball.  Nelson Cruz for one.  Many, many others including Mickey Tettleton, etc.

    It’s a matter of taste. I am and have been for a couple years a Jurickson Profar fan and you, obviously are not. 

    WHat’s your solution? Do you want to go with the same team that was 15 games below .500 for an extended period in crunch time, using 3 rookies in the rotation with horrid offensive struggles MINUS Kepler, Farmer and Thielbar? 

    I think the Twins are gonna have to draw an inside straight or close with their young players, Lee, Lewis, Miranda, Rodriguez, Keaschall, Julien, Morris, Festa and Zebby, Keirsey Jr, Martin to be winners in 2025 unless Falvey gets up off his can and makes some real trades to improve the team.

    I do like every one of the young guys I named but usually experience counts in MLB and young players struggle. Maybe, Lee, Julien and Lewis have that out of the way.

    I, for one, yearn for the outlier Falvey, who only once in his 8 year tenure, went out and kicked ass in the offseason, bringing in almost 100 home runs in C.J. Cron, Schoop and Nelson Cruz. Since, for the last 5 years, the Twins average 81.8 wins per season with the two following the 101 win season being dreadful and last year being a huge disappointment. Now, this historically dreadful offseason so far.

    I’m actually an optimist with the Twins, I would have never lasted from 65 to 25 as an unrelentingly avid Twins fan if I couldn’t take the lows of Griffith post free agency, Terry Ryan part 2 and this mediocre Falvey reign so far. Logical, no, An in-love-with-the-Minnesota-Twins-since-very-young ultra fan. Yes.

    Sean Johnson would be my #1 pick for most important organization member due to the farm system being a huge bright spot.

    My disappointment, is, I’m afraid, born of my high aspirations for the Twins and profound disappointment with the Happ’s, Shoemakers, Mahler, Bundy’s, and our 0 for 30 pinch hitting friend.

     

    I'm not going to be a victim of recency bias. The Twins finished with 82 wins despite an epic run of failure at the end of the season. They were one of the best teams in baseball over a far longer stretch. Minus Kepler, Farmer, and Thielbar doesn't bother me. None of those guys were vital parts to the Twins success and all are easily replaced or improved upon.

    A number of their young guys will fail. I'm not a Julien believer, and I don't think Lee is a star. Lewis ran out of gas, hopefully his new offseason program helps with that. But they have no choice, the young guys are what supplies every team, especially those in the lower payroll regions, with the chances to win.

    I don't know what "outlier Falvey" means in how you're describing things. He hasn't stopped bringing in the Cron, Schoop, and Cruz types. That season just happened to come with a juiced ball that allowed the non-Cruz players to play above their career norms for a season. The reason they've averaged 81.8 wins a season since then is because the rest of the "outlier Falvey" signings have played as expected, not very well. Farmer, Margot, Gallo, Santana, Solano, Vazquez, MAT, Luplow, Garlick, Gary Sanchez, Gio Urshela, Andrelton Simmons, Refsnyder, Donaldson. These guys are all in that Cron, Schoop, Cruz type mold of "outlier Falvey." It's why they've been bad. Because relying on outliers to succeed is a bad bet. 

    You're disappointed in the Happ, Shoemakers, Mahle, Bundy, and Margot acquisitions, but it's what you're asking for. That's my point. You point to Cron, Schoop, and Cruz like they were somehow different than the collection of players I've named and the 5 you did. The only difference is that 2019 team played above career norms that season. That's not a good team building plan. And Cron, Schoop, and Cruz all had a higher percentage of successful seasons before they came here than Profar has had. 

    You can be a Profar fan. Not telling you not to be. But I doubt you were watching him play in Colorado in 2023 and thinking he was the answer to the Twins problems while he hit .236/.316/.364/.680 over 111 games. Maybe you enjoyed his 2022 season where he was a slightly above average hitter. But suggesting he's not a question mark just because you've been a fan of his and the Twins are full of question marks even though they've performed as well or consistently as he has doesn't make sense. Profar has had 1 clearly above average season in 10 seasons. You can suggest that's enough to make you want to take a chance on him, but claiming the Twins problem is that they're full of question marks and then pointing to a guy with a 10% success rate as a clear answer is contradictory. 

    2 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    I'm not going to be a victim of recency bias. The Twins finished with 82 wins despite an epic run of failure at the end of the season. They were one of the best teams in baseball over a far longer stretch. Minus Kepler, Farmer, and Thielbar doesn't bother me. None of those guys were vital parts to the Twins success and all are easily replaced or improved upon.

    A number of their young guys will fail. I'm not a Julien believer, and I don't think Lee is a star. Lewis ran out of gas, hopefully his new offseason program helps with that. But they have no choice, the young guys are what supplies every team, especially those in the lower payroll regions, with the chances to win.

    I don't know what "outlier Falvey" means in how you're describing things. He hasn't stopped bringing in the Cron, Schoop, and Cruz types. That season just happened to come with a juiced ball that allowed the non-Cruz players to play above their career norms for a season. The reason they've averaged 81.8 wins a season since then is because the rest of the "outlier Falvey" signings have played as expected, not very well. Farmer, Margot, Gallo, Santana, Solano, Vazquez, MAT, Luplow, Garlick, Gary Sanchez, Gio Urshela, Andrelton Simmons, Refsnyder, Donaldson. These guys are all in that Cron, Schoop, Cruz type mold of "outlier Falvey." It's why they've been bad. Because relying on outliers to succeed is a bad bet. 

    You're disappointed in the Happ, Shoemakers, Mahle, Bundy, and Margot acquisitions, but it's what you're asking for. That's my point. You point to Cron, Schoop, and Cruz like they were somehow different than the collection of players I've named and the 5 you did. The only difference is that 2019 team played above career norms that season. That's not a good team building plan. And Cron, Schoop, and Cruz all had a higher percentage of successful seasons before they came here than Profar has had. 

    You can be a Profar fan. Not telling you not to be. But I doubt you were watching him play in Colorado in 2023 and thinking he was the answer to the Twins problems while he hit .236/.316/.364/.680 over 111 games. Maybe you enjoyed his 2022 season where he was a slightly above average hitter. But suggesting he's not a question mark just because you've been a fan of his and the Twins are full of question marks even though they've performed as well or consistently as he has doesn't make sense. Profar has had 1 clearly above average season in 10 seasons. You can suggest that's enough to make you want to take a chance on him, but claiming the Twins problem is that they're full of question marks and then pointing to a guy with a 10% success rate as a clear answer is contradictory. 

    I think we could talk for 5,000 hours and still be in disagreement. I will say Cron, School and Cruz were all accomplished. Cruz was very good for a long time. Cron whacked 20+ homers the year before and has had some good power years since. Schoop had been good and was good, then fell apart. I don’t agree that Falvey has brought in anywhere near the caliber of that trio since.

    4 minutes ago, Greglw3 said:

    I think we could talk for 5,000 hours and still be in disagreement. I will say Cron, School and Cruz were all accomplished. Cruz was very good for a long time. Cron whacked 20+ homers the year before and has had some good power years since. Schoop had been good and was good, then fell apart. I don’t agree that Falvey has brought in anywhere near the caliber of that trio since.

    Cruz is an outlier in the names you provided. He's not at all comparable to Cron and Schoop. Here's 6 batters and their stats from the 3 years before the Twins brought them in. See if you can pick out Cruz, Cron, and Schoop vs 3 guys who the Twins brought in after 2019 (I included 2019 if 2020 was one of the 3 years since that year was so short).

    And, for comparison sake, Profar's last 3 is 435 G, 1598 PA, 409 H, 48 HR, 189 RBI, 16 SB, .256/.346/.409/.755, 109 OPS+.

    image.png.4e59e1296b53bf5e9fda238b92ce7e87.png




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...