Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Have Never Before Spent Like This at a Trade Deadline

    Trade deadlines are usually light on payroll increases when it comes to the Minnesota Twins. Not this year. In fact, quite the opposite�even historically so.

    Peter Labuza
    Image courtesy of Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    As the trade deadline dust settled on Monday night, the Minnesota Twins couldn't be blamed for lack of trying in 2026. But more importantly, Tom Pohlad made good on his promise from this spring. Money went out of his pocket and into the team. In all, an estimated $8.5 million was added to the team's payroll, bringing the total up to $113 million.

    That might not seem like much in the long run, and given some of the names bandied about, it’s less than some fans might want. But this is still ultimately a .500 team in an evenly competitive fight among not just two other AL Central teams, but a handful of Wild Card hopefuls. With no reason to cash in all the chips, it did what a normal team with a normal payroll would do: quietly buy, but not by running straight to the bargain bin.

    During Joe Pohlad’s tenure (not to mention Jim's), the trade deadline became a nonsensical spectacle. Despite working with much higher payrolls then than they are right now (adjusted for baseball inflation, at least), the deadline always became an awkward moment where the team asked fans to look the other way. That resulted in two near-silent deadlines, despite the potential of the team, followed by an event that's still scarring much of the fanbase.

    Not for Tom’s pesky Twins. They got a big infusion of talent, via a big infusion of money. So how big was this trade deadline? I put the numbers together, looking at not just how much more money was taken on, but the actual percentage of payroll added during the season over the last decade. (Some numbers are rough estimates, but the results are largely in the same range.)

    Player Acquired Player Sent Out Money In Money Out
    2017
    Jaime Garcia Prospect $4,500,000  
    Anthony Recker Prospect $800,000 $100,000
    (Provided by Braves)
    Zack Littel + Dietrich Enns Jaime Garcia $75,988 (Twins Covered
    Garcia's Salary)
    Prospect + $500,000
    International Bonus Pool Money
    Brandon Kintzer   $1,506,992
    Total Payroll Added $3,768,996
    Total Payroll $108,102,500
    Percent Gain 3.49%
    2019
    Sergio Romo Prospects $873,665  
    Sam Dyson Prospects $1,639,802  
    Total Payroll Added $2,513,467
    Total Payroll $119,651,933
    Percent Gain 2.10%
    2022
    Tyler Mahle Prospects $1,828,544  
    Michael Fulmer Prospects $1,740,672  
    Jorge Lopez Prospects $527,488  
    Total Payroll Added $4,096,704
    Total Payroll $134,408,190
    Percent Gain 3.05%
    2023
    Dylan Floro Jorge Lopez $1,383,888 $1,999,168
    Total Payroll Added -$615,280
    Total Payroll $153,713,740
    Percent Gain -0.40%
    2024
    Trevor Richards Prospect $693,540  
    Total Payroll Added $693,540
    Total Payroll $129,080,051
    Percent Gain 0.54%
    2026
    Dean Kremer Prospect $1,752,693  
    AJ Minter Prospect $3,411,792  
    Jeff Hoffman
    (Assuming 60 IP+)
    Prospects + Intl
    Bonus Pool Money
    $3,727,160 $250,000
    Total Payroll Added $8,641,645
    Total Payroll $113,000,000
    Percent Gain 7.65%

    (For this calculation, I included Hoffman’s first pitching incentive, which begins at 60 IP. He currently sits at 48, and as long as the team remains competitive, he should reach it easily. If he goes 70 somehow, the team will kick in another $500,000.)

    As shown, the Twins have never before increased their payroll by over 5% of their current setup. (Obviously, we're not looking back at all of team history, but the previous clubs were even more skinflint than they've been lately, and these are the winning teams (therefore, the ones worth adding money to) since Derek Falvey took over.) Just as starkly, the raw dollars spent doubled even the biggest increase before this, in 2022. Of course, much of this began with payroll sitting so low in comparison, but neither Hoffman nor Minter came cheaply. They came at standard reliever prices that previous administrations would have likely balked at.

    Even with the $3 million and change covered by Toronto for 2027 (as reported), Hoffman is now the biggest acquisition by the Twins at the deadline. He actually ranks quite high compared to the biggest payroll splashes made by other teams, too. Just look at the money spent on big names over the years in comparison: 

    Year Twins' "Big" Deal Money In MLB's Biggest Deal Money In
    2017 Jaime Garcia $4.5 Million Justin Verlander to Astros $40 Million
    2019 Sam Dyson $1.63 Million Zack Greinke to Astros $53 Million
    2022 Tyler Mahle $1.83 Million Eric Hosmer to Red Sox $39 Million
    2024 Trevor Richards $0.69 Million Jorge Soler to Braves $30 Million
    2025 Jeff Hoffman $11 Million Luis Castillo to White Sox $30 Million

    In the past, the Twins have usually spent less than 10% of what was spent on the most expensive player league-wide. This year, they're on the high side of 30% of that figure; they took on a big bill for Hoffman. Another way to think about this: the Dodgers are spending about $9.58 million—the largest of any player's annual average value—to acquire Tarik Skubal at the deadline, along with some mostly waiver pick-ups. The Twins might be far behind in payroll, but they're not far away from having spent more at the deadline than the Dodgers did.

    As one of the long-tenured Pohlad skeptics, I've always questioned what Tom Pohlad might do. You might scoff at the Twins not getting Zack Neto or otherwise landing a bigger name, but the most important thing happened in Twins trade deadline history: money was not the impediment to the goal. Jeremy Zoll set out to buy relievers, and buy relievers he did. Now, the rest is up to the team.

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I'd have an easier time finding some satisfaction in this without these articles.  I'm so glad @The Great Hambino has weighed in on these threads with more straight-forward, well-articulated thoughts than I would.

    I got second hand "eww" reading this.  This is some seriously gross PR for a deadline that was pretty "meh"

     

    3 hours ago, Thumbs Down Guy said:

    The Twins  don’t go big enough, but trading Dasan Hill is toooooooooo much.

    I find myself saying this now and then, but it seems faintly possible that different individuals were the ones posting these contradictory things, perhaps also at different times.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...