Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Flip Side of Free Agency Frustration


    Nick Nelson

    Free agency. It represents a world of endless possibilities. Especially at a time where generational superstars like Bryce Harper and Manny Machado are out there, openly available to all 30 teams, the free agent market offers a chance for fans to dream big.

    Of course, any Twins faithful who fantasized of flashy acquisitions this offseason have found themselves mostly disappointed. Minnesota's avoidance of the traditional free agency avenue has been resolute, almost as if by design.

    I believe there are reasons behind this approach that don't amount to, "They're cheap".

    Image courtesy of Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Here are a few experiences that Derek Falvey and Thad Levine have had with free agency since taking over the Twins front office:

    * In their first signature move, they quickly signed free agent Jason Castro to a three-year contract. He was solid in his first year, and the second was a total loss. Now he enters Year 3 as a fairly significant (and somewhat pricey) question mark.

    * In their second year, they signed Addison Reed, Logan Morrison and Lance Lynn for a combined ~$25 million. Morrison and Lynn were busts, and so to a lesser extent was Reed, who now enters Year 2 as a fairly significant (and somewhat pricey) question mark.

    * They made a serious bid for Yu Darvish last winter, reportedly offering more than $100 million before falling short of the Cubs and watching the right-hander immediately bomb in Chicago.

    * They inherited the contract of Ervin Santana, who qualifies as one of Minnesota's most successful free agent signings ever, but saw the downside of that deal as well with $13.5 million of their payroll dedicated to a guy who provided basically nothing in 2018.

    * They also inherited the contract of Phil Hughes, some of which they're still on the hook for this year. Granted, it was an ill-advised extension rather than Hughes' original deal that went sour, but he's another fine example of the dangers in long-term commitments to veterans – even those that are on top of their games at the time.

    So now we come to the team's approach this year in free agency. With the exception of Nelson Cruz, none of the players acquired by Minnesota were on those lists fans skimmed through in September and let their brains run wild, because none of them were firmly expected to be on the market. And now most players that did occupy the upper levels of those rankings are gone.

    Is this by design? Are the Twins attempting to take advantage of a league-wide aversion to spending by capturing quality players who are being unfairly devalued? It sure seems that way.

    Instead of tethering themselves to expensive, inescapable commitments for players on the higher tiers (which, as we've learned time and time again, carry no assurances) the front office is making deals on its own terms.

    Martin Perez on a one-year deal plus team option is actually a lot more interesting than those standard Terry Ryan flyers of yesteryear, because it has real upside. Perez doesn't turn 28 until April. If the Twins are able to unlock whatever they see in him (and I have to believe it's more than meets the eye, because other teams were interested too), they've actually found themselves an asset. The same is true of Cruz and Blake Parker, though they don't have the same long-term fit potential.

    One that does is Jonathan Schoop. He's probably the player we're not talking about enough. The Twins aggressively signed him one week after his non-tender from Milwaukee. He's an athletic defender, one year removed from an All-Star season, and he's averaged 25 homers in the past three seasons. Most vitally, he's only 27.

    Guys like this don't become available too often. And for teams that want more of a sure thing – such as the Brewers, who elected to move on – maybe he's not the best choice. But within Minnesota's developing strategy, he made all the sense in the world. Unlike the others added this winter, his contract doesn't include a 2020 option, but if he rebounds, blends into the nucleus, and likes it here? Now you might've found yourself a newly minted piece to your core.

    It's tough to knock any of these deals on their own. But when you look at the big picture it's easy to feel a bit underwhelmed. As someone in the forums astutely put it: "the sum is lesser than its parts." I understand and empathize with the lack of enthusiasm some are feeling. But ultimately, it's not Jed Lowrie or Adam Ottavino that's going to put fans in the seats. Winning will.

    You may not be jazzed about the caliber of these names. But don't conflate the current front office with the previous regime. These aren't your garden-variety bargain bin signings of the Kevin Correia or Mike Pelfrey ilk. There's a deeper methodology in place, and I'm sure I'm only scratching its surface.

    From my view, the Twins are hoping they can hit on a few of these gambles while the incumbents rebound enough to keep them hanging in a weak division. Then, around the middle of the season they can more clearly assess their position and their needs. As I concluded on Monday, the silver lining to this resource preservation is that it will give them extreme flexibility leading up to the trade deadline.

    The pessimistic view is that the Twins are treading water until 2020. The optimistic (and I think more realistic) view is that they're treading water until June or July.

    Let us not forget: The most impactful, game-changing transaction in the American League over the past two years didn't happen during the offseason. It happened when Detroit traded Justin Verlander to Houston in August of 2017. Given the league's expected landscape this summer, it's not hard to envision similar opportunities emerging in a sea of non-contenders.

    So, there's something to dream on.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    "the front office is making deals on its own terms"

     

    I like the approach. I have never been a fan of long contracts, especially for pitchers. Although, having watched Yu Darvish for years down here in Texas, I admit I wanted the Twins to sign him.

     

    You also missed Michael Pineda in your rundown of this regime's free agent signings. Another deal on their terms. They gave Pineda security in his injury year in exchange for a 2nd year at reasonable cost. Its a low-risk gamble that could really pay dividends this year. And I feel like Pineda will be motivated to reward the Twins for their investment.

    I really don't care about budgets and whether or not the FO is spending as much as they could or should. I don't mind if the FO is pursuing a strategy of combing thru the discard pile, or dumpster diving or whatever you choose to call it. There is no doubt that good players can and are often acquired this way. Sometimes long term producers are found this way.

     

    The thing is if you are going to pursue a strategy of finding bargains, looking for marginal upgrades, and looking for bounce back candidates, you need to be good at it. Your processes,evaluations and judgements need to be good. You can't be losing many Derreck Rodriguez' s or going through the whole process of identifying, signing and working with the perfect bounce back candidate in Anibal Sanchez and then getting no benefit from that good work.

     

    Be good at this strategy also means more than getting good value for what you spend. The pieces have to fit together. Is having 2/3 of your lineup comprised of what appear to Be low acerage,poor contact, high strike out sluggers a good thing? Does adding Perez even at a bargain price, when you already have a very similar pitcher in Meija? Both are backend starter types who haven't worked out of the bullpen. Neither can be sent to the minors. Do both fit on the same roster?

     

    It is too early to say that this FO can't execute this strategy. Nick Nelson is right about that. So are the people wondering whether this strategy will help the Twins contend even if the core group actually become a core group. The FO chose this strategy rather than make bigger perhaps more easily justified splashes. Now they need to make their chosen strategy work.

    Nick, a well thought out article and I generally agree with everything you outlined. I do believe in the theory of more accurately figuring out this team, as well as seeing what the new staff can do with it. With that understood, I don't even have an issue with a certain degree of payroll rollback for 2019, especially if it allows for future moves.

     

    Where I DO have an issue is missed opportunity to augment this roster, just as it is, to help this team win. And I don't imply a single $20M signing to do so. With such an obvious need for a reliable and proven pen arm, with so many available and the costs being so reasonable, they have missed opportunity. With a number of solid bat, versatile players available for infield depth and protection for Sano, they have done nothing.

     

    Perez may seem like a fall guy. But it goes beyond that. With young pitching that NEEDS opportunity and experience, and with other holes left un-filled, this particular move, along with a couple "non-moves" has me very frustrated.

     

    Maybe lightening strikes and I will be forced to gladly eat my words. But the $3.5M for Perez could have been used much more effectively on a couple final pieces while still keeping the 2019 payroll down.

     

    When you start plugging in longer term free agent or two, you have a club built around them, in which those free agents do fill obvious holes,

     

    Right now the Twins have a roster with, perhaps, 20-21 holes. It seems no one is in the longterm plans on the current roster, otherwise the Twins would be going out of their way to extend the players. The couple obvious choices for extension are Berrios (they better do something) and Rosario (do you really want to build a franchise around him). 

     

    So many questions that needed answers last season and the Twins didn't get them, but the promise is still there, so you take another and much longer look.

     

    The Twins are playing for the future, the promise of the signings of the current administration becoming the team of the future. Look at the current 40-man roster. ho on the roster should be here in 2020. Who should be here in 2021. Who in 2022. You are better to ask who "might" and some of those "mights" are still in the minors.

     

    Kepler and Buxton are still questionable. Sano is a big question for an esxensiuon. The Twins have no 2B/ss. They have patchwork at 1B. The atching is a mess. Not that any/all of these guys could play well in 2019. But the only proven given is an aging DH. The rotation has three guys entering free agency and one longer extension candidate. They have a bunch of starters that you hope can pitch you into the 6th inning. Hope is the big word. 

     

    The bullpen has no closer and a couple of overworked setup guys, and the usual mix of arms with a couple in the wings. Anyone you want to extend? ANyone you can live without? Before you say May and Rogers, really think about that.

     

    Yes, the Twins could sign a couple of HUGHE free agents. But now, they are rebuilding. The pieces they have MIGHT make them competitive if the players want big money in the future (something that should've also happened last year with names like Santana, Lynn, Dozier, Morrison all playing for BIG contracts in the years ahead.)

     

    There is a plan. We have to be patient. The front office WANTS to make a team and organization in their own image. It takes time (sadly), but once the pieces start falling into place, we MIGHT have success and actually get young conrollable longterm free agents.

     

    Don't agree. So what you are saying is that this team needs to wait for the perfect storm in order to add anyone with real talent? 

     

    What is wrong with picking up a piece here, piece there. Even if you think your window isn't until 2020 and beyond? Is it against the rules to sign or trade for these 27-30 year old guys for 2-4 years so that they can be here to help now and into the future? 

     

    If you really feel nothing will happen until 2020 or beyond, then roll with the young guys!! See what you have in some of those pitchers! Don't sign a never was, never will be guy that's 28 and never been any good, just let Mejia take the reigns he will cost nothing and give you the same or more results anyway!

     

    I'm always of the belief that there is a chance to add premium talent, if it is in your budget and the player is the right age, you should do whatever you can to get it. Quit hoping and praying so much. Just cut down the numbers of players you bring in, make sure they are guys you can count on producing, and fill in the gaps with your minor league system.

     

    I'm not sure there's necessarily a stark difference in those decisions, though. Given their ages, signing Machado or Harper now might be our best bet at 90 wins this year AND our best bet at achieving 100 wins in 2021. It's not like every offseason has a top 26 year old free agent with a bunch of big market teams sitting out, and we'd still have all our prospect depth from which to trade. Or targeting a controllable 26 year old in trade -- not every offseason will have a Christian Yelich on the block, like the Brewers scored last winter. Plus 2 year deals for guys like Robertson, whom you already said you were interested in, which also wouldn't cause you to lose any "ammo" for bolstering the 2021+ squads.

     

    If you want to argue against a 5 year deal for Keuchel right now, I am fine with that. (Although I could give some leeway if the front office believed in a guy like Corbin.) But that's generally not what I have in mind when I say I'd like the Twins to be more aggressive about winning right now.

     

    I wouldn't argue against Machado or Harper, just the ability to get them here. Sign me up for one or both if possible. 

     

    Robertson, Familia and Soria were the relievers at the top of my list this year. Since Familia went back to the only team he's ever known it's hard to blame anyone for that. Wish the other two would have worked out.

     

    I don't like Keuchel and his sinker, he's had success with it so he he's unlikely to change. Corbin's 40% slider usage is the only thing making me say no to him. It's my favorite pitch, but that kind of frequency makes me think his elbow is going to give out again real soon.

     

     

    I do not care what Buxton and Sano will be!  I want a team that wins.  I want a roster of big league players and if the three year superstud prospects come through, great, but if we are just waiting than maybe the fans should wait and buy tickets when the prospects come through.  

    Year after year it is if Buxton and Sano....  Put a team together and when Buston and Sano arrive they will ride with talent to a title. 

     

    Has this front office hypnotized us?  Are we all waiting for the illusionist to mystify us?  This is professional ball.  That means that the teams are supposed to be playing for the championship.  If Sano and Buxton had come through last year we still would not have been in the World Series.  Quit being Minnesota Nice.  When we stink, we stink!

    Instead of tethering themselves to expensive, inescapable commitments for players on the higher tiers (which, as we've learned time and time again, carry no assurances) the front office is making deals on its own terms.

     

    Apart from the Britton deal and potentially Kimbrel's would any of the relief contracts handed out this offseason damage future spending in any significant way? Honestly, there were a ton of short term deals this club could've struck with far superior talent. Also, what assurances do these bargain bin acquisitions provide? 

     

    These aren't your garden-variety bargain bin signings. There's a deeper methodology in place, and I'm sure I'm only scratching its surface. The silver lining to this resource preservation is that it will give them extreme flexibility leading up to the trade deadline.

     

    Flexibility was the spin last offseason, I vote for something new this year...

    The goalposts keep moving in regards to when we can expect this organization to act as though they're invested in fielding a truly competitive team, and also when we should hold the FO accountable for the product on the field.

     

    Except this trend also played out prominently elsewhere around the league. If we looked at the entire list of top 50 free agents or so, and assessed how things played out in 2018, I think we'd fine more misses than hits everywhere.

     

    Look no further than Colorado's aggressive efforts to power up their bullpen through FA. 

    In descending order of size of contract the top 20 for 2017 are: Hosmer, 1.4 bwar, Darvish- out, J D Martinez 6.4, Cain 6.9 Arrietta 3.1 Santana 1.7, Cobb 1.1, Davis 1.1 43 saves, 6 blown ones, Jay Bruce negative bwar, Chatwood 0.0 Cozart 0.1, Mike Minor 3.8, McGee -0.8,  Shaw -1.1, Morrow 1.4 , in 35 appearances, Hunter 1.5 in 65 relief appearances Frazier 1.5, Nicasio -1.1, Reed 0.1, Neshek 0.8 in 30 appearances.  Lance Lynn was the only player outside of that group to land a contract of more than 10 m/y Last year there were way more misses than hits.

    In case anyone disagrees, another useless stat from last year. There were 721191 pitches thrown last year. The swinging strike rate was 10.7%.  there were 41018 hits. There was way more misses than hits last year

     

    I really think this fanbase needs to consider an ownership revolt. We all helped finance this beautiful ballpark I can't afford to take my family to and we STILL get the Bankster boogie... I will not support this team anymore (after 52 years) until ownership does.

     

    I do agree that we are all pretty disappointed about how the last 7-8 years have gone with this team. We want this team to start shelling out for the Harper's and Machado's. But I think with Spring Training around the corner, it's time to be a bit more hopeful. There's always a chance and it's not like this team has given up. C'mon man, get in the spirit.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...