Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    It's Time for the Twins to Turn Kendry Rojas Loose

    The Twins continue to deploy Kendry Rojas in a hybrid role that maximizes neither his development nor his value. It's time to make a permanent move to the bullpen.

    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    When the Minnesota Twins acquired Kendry Rojas from the Toronto Blue Jays at last year's trade deadline, they were betting on upside. The controversial trade that sent Louis Varland to Toronto also brought Alan Roden to the organization, but Rojas was viewed as the potential long-term prize. A fringe top-100 prospect, he featured a mid- to high-90s fastball, a devastating slider, and the kind of raw stuff that made scouts believe he could eventually settle into the middle of a major-league rotation.

    There was always one major concern, though. Rojas struggled to consistently throw strikes, and that issue has followed him to Minnesota. Between Triple-A St. Paul and the Twins, Rojas has walked 44 batters in just 43 2/3 innings. The electric arsenal is still there, but the command hasn't improved enough to convince the organization he can handle the workload of a traditional starting pitcher.

    If the Twins truly believed Rojas was part of their future rotation, they'd be developing him like one. Instead, they've done the opposite. Since joining the organization, Rojas has bounced between starting and relieving, without ever really fitting either role. In his two major-league starts, he lasted just two innings and four innings, respectively. With the Saints, he's started five games but has never been allowed to throw more than four innings, usually exiting after just two or three. Even when he's come out of the bullpen, he hasn't been used as a traditional late-inning reliever. Instead, he's worked one to three innings as a piggyback option or long reliever after an early exit from another pitcher.

    That hybrid role is arguably the least valuable one a pitcher can fill. He's not providing the length teams expect from a starter. Nor is he being trusted to record the biggest outs at the ends of games. Instead, he's stuck somewhere in the middle, where neither his development nor his impact is being maximized. At some point, the Twins need to decide what they believe Rojas is, because the current plan isn't a long-term solution.

    The organization's usage tells the story. Teams don't consistently pull starting pitchers after two, three, or four innings unless they have concerns about their ability to turn a lineup over multiple times. Rojas has premium velocity and an excellent slider, but he doesn't yet have the command, demonstrated durability or complete pitch mix to profile as a traditional starter. There's nothing wrong with that. Plenty of talented pitchers have found greater success after moving to the bullpen. In fact, the Twins have already shown exactly how to maximize this type of arm. Ironically, the blueprint belongs to the same pitcher they traded away to acquire Rojas.

    Louis Varland also entered professional baseball as a starter. When that role didn't fully click, the Twins tried him as a multi-inning reliever, before eventually committing him to one inning at a time. That's when everything changed. Without worrying about pacing himself for multiple trips through the lineup, Varland was able to attack hitters with maximum effort. His velocity ticked up, and his best pitches became even more effective. The result was one of the best late-inning relievers in the American League. There's every reason to believe Rojas could follow a similar path.

    He's already capable of reaching the upper 90s while pitching multiple innings. In a one-inning role, it's easy to envision him sitting comfortably in the upper 90s, while occasionally touching triple digits. More importantly, he wouldn't need to rely on a deep arsenal. He could lean heavily on his overpowering fastball and devastating slider, allowing his two best pitches to play at their highest level, instead of trying to navigate hitters multiple times with inconsistent command.

    The timing also couldn't be better. The Twins suddenly have an opening for another impact left-hander after Anthony Banda landed on the injured list with a lat strain earlier this week. A power lefty capable of missing bats late in games is something every contender covets, and Rojas has the raw talent to become exactly that if the organization commits to the transition.

    Right now, though, the Twins are getting the worst of both worlds. Rojas isn't developing into the type of starter who can consistently give the club five or six innings, and he isn't being allowed to become the high-leverage reliever his stuff suggests he could be. He's simply existing in between those roles, and that isn't helping either the player or the organization.

    The Twins don't need another hybrid pitcher. They need impact arms, especially in the bullpen. Rojas has all the ingredients to become one, if the organization is willing to stop trying to force him into a role that no longer appears realistic. It's time to pick a lane.

    Turn Kendry Rojas into a true one-inning reliever. Let him attack hitters with his fastball and slider. Let him throw every pitch at maximum effort, instead of worrying about saving something for the fourth inning. The Twins already followed this exact formula with Varland. The irony is that the player they acquired in exchange for him may need the very same treatment.


    What do you think? Should the Twins commit to Kendry Rojas as a late-inning reliever, or would you continue trying to develop him as a starter? Leave a comment below and start the conversation!


    View our top trade candidates list, up to nearly 70 names and updated regularly!

    View Trade Candidates

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Brandon Winokur

    Wichita Wind Surge - AA, 3B/CF
    On Sunday, Winokur went 3-for-4 with a walk, his third Surge homer and three RBI. He has reached base in all 14 AA games and hit .321/.375/.518 (.893) with a triple and 3 HR.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, bean5302 said:

     

    A failed starter is a pitcher who is either pitching so poorly in the rotation they're hurting their team's chances at winning without expectations there's much untapped growth or a pitcher who has reached the point of call-up and they don't appear likely to be able to provide quality service in the rotation so they're moved to the bullpen.

    Morris certainly wasn't doing a lot to make his case as a starter during his time in AAA. His peripherals and expected metrics looked uninspiring while putting up numbers which often looked a lot like Randy Dobnak. Morris pitching out of the pen has allowed his K rate to come up, but once the scouting reports get out on him, I wonder if that will stick.

     

    You remain consistent, having commented in the past that Andrew Morris was not an MLB pitcher and that his stuff wouldn't play; you don't believe in Morris.

    Pitching is not easy to predict for anyone. I have been high on Morris for a couple of years. The numbers will tell the story in time. In the period from 2024- now, I have seen Morris pitch many times .... the majority of his appearances. I don't believe I can state an argument for him in an unequivocal fashion but I do believe in him finding success and his emergence at some point (next year?) as a successful starting pitcher would not be a surprise to me.

    I wonder how many times others have watched him pitch prior to his recent Twins gig.

    Kendry Rojas has to learn some of the same skills as Morris is learning - what does it take to create outs against the best hitters. While I do trust the Twins to make a good decision for him, I also believe he can benefit from pitching in relief this season.

    15 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    This is a pretty pragmatic view.  However,  I generally believe SPs should not be converted to RPs until they fail as a SP.  However, I am somewhat on the fence as to let him continue to develop as a SP in AAA or put him in the Twins BP.   My 1st impulse is that developing the consistency he lacks would be best done in AAA.  Then again, I think this is a very nuanced decision, so I don't have a strong opinion.

    If you have trouble throwing strikes in St Paul, a promotion to the bigs isn't going to help. 

    The degree of angst over whether Rojas should be a starter or reliever seems way over the top for a 23 year old that’s been in the organization for 11 months. Santana threw out of the PEN at least 2 1/2 years at MLB level as he refined things and got adjusted to MLB life & MLB hitters.

    If Rojas throws in relief (I think he should next 3 months) it doesn’t matter to me whether he’s throwing 1 inning or 2 2/3……….he’s pitching for the betterment of the Team’s chances, and Adams & Lawyerson are not. Him displacing a much less talented guy in the PEN is what I’d like to see in the very near term.

    If the Team wants him to get a few starts, stretch him out after they punt due to record & allow him 3-4 starts in September. In the meantime use him in shorter stints to keep his innings down & to help get guys out for the TEAM.

    9 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    You remain consistent, having commented in the past that Andrew Morris was not an MLB pitcher and that his stuff wouldn't play; you don't believe in Morris.

    Pitching is not easy to predict for anyone. I have been high on Morris for a couple of years. The numbers will tell the story in time. In the period from 2024- now, I have seen Morris pitch many times .... the majority of his appearances. I don't believe I can state an argument for him in an unequivocal fashion but I do believe in him finding success and his emergence at some point (next year?) as a successful starting pitcher would not be a surprise to me.

    I wonder how many times others have watched him pitch prior to his recent Twins gig.

    Kendry Rojas has to learn some of the same skills as Morris is learning - what does it take to create outs against the best hitters. While I do trust the Twins to make a good decision for him, I also believe he can benefit from pitching in relief this season.

    100% agree with last paragraph. Morris - Rojas - etc. need to mature and learn how to get MLB hitters out ……… starting as a reliever makes that development time easier to handle, IMO. Can gain experience and help team while refining skills that will help them going forward in the Rotation or from the PEN.

    1 hour ago, HrbieFan said:

    If you have trouble throwing strikes in St Paul, a promotion to the bigs isn't going to help. 

    He's not having problems throwing strikes. 2.86 BB/9 is fine. 67% strike rate with a 50.1% zone rate in AAA. He's excellent on the strike rate (because of whiffs/fouls on balls) and good enough on the zone rate. 

    39 minutes ago, JD-TWINS said:

    100% agree with last paragraph. Morris - Rojas - etc. need to mature and learn how to get MLB hitters out ……… starting as a reliever makes that development time easier to handle, IMO. Can gain experience and help team while refining skills that will help them going forward in the Rotation or from the PEN.

    Starting as a reliever reduces experience by 70% which makes learning that much harder.

    Players start as relievers if they cannot be effective starters. MLB is not for learning how to pitch. That's why Rule 5 guys almost never stick. MLB is for guys who've already figured out their stuff, but need to learn what stuff they have works best against big leaguers, and to polish command. More innings, more pitches = more experience. 

    Maybe long relief (hybrid) isn't as glamourous as being a SP or a high leverage RP, but IMO, it's just as important. Overextending our SPs & burning out our short RPs is a recipe for going 20 some years w/o a play-off win & not going as far as we could have; because our pitching have been shot, come playoffs,

    There are many great SPs that started out in the pen. Put Raya in the MLB pen. Let him get a feel of the MLB, strengthen his arm while not overdoing it. IMO, he'll become a very good SP but keep him in the pen as long relief & some spot starts where we need him.

    I'm a firm believer in having our young SPs pitch long relief in the MLB & give them as many innings as they can take & not waste their bullets in AAA. This one thing I like the CWS are doing, they are pitching their young SPs in the pen & winning. They are surprising many pundits but not me.

    22 hours ago, bean5302 said:

     

    A failed starter is a pitcher who is either pitching so poorly in the rotation they're hurting their team's chances at winning without expectations there's much untapped growth or a pitcher who has reached the point of call-up and they don't appear likely to be able to provide quality service in the rotation so they're moved to the bullpen.

    Morris certainly wasn't doing a lot to make his case as a starter during his time in AAA. His peripherals and expected metrics looked uninspiring while putting up numbers which often looked a lot like Randy Dobnak. Morris pitching out of the pen has allowed his K rate to come up, but once the scouting reports get out on him, I wonder if that will stick.

     

    a 1.23 ERA in 2026 for st paul do you even watch baseball.

    On 7/3/2026 at 3:52 PM, bean5302 said:

    #1 - 5.0 WAR
    #2 - 4.0 WAR
    #3 - 3.0 WAR
    #4 - 2.0 WAR
    #5 - 1.5 WAR

    Elite RP - 1.75 WAR
    Great RP - 1.25 WAR

     

    While I’d guess the WAR averages here are largely wrong for the relievers and #3-5 starters, I don’t think this is at all reflective of true value.

    Duran, Jax and Varland all returned a better haul than Bailey Ober would have ever brought back. High leverage relievers are more valuable than #4-5 starters despite throwing fewer total innings. Often more valuable than #3 starters.

    That said, Rojas is one of the few I like to possibly be a #1-2 starter.

    Also, I’m glad this article points out that multi inning relievers are at the absolute bottom of the totem pole. Your most electric failed starters should be pushed to the high leverage situations. Your inning-eating, just-get-me-to-tomorrow pitchers should be the waiver wire fodder you don’t mind casting off in a month. 

    28 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

    While I’d guess the WAR averages here are largely wrong for the relievers and #3-5 starters, I don’t think this is at all reflective of true value.

    Duran, Jax and Varland all returned a better haul than Bailey Ober would have ever brought back. High leverage relievers are more valuable than #4-5 starters despite throwing fewer total innings. Often more valuable than #3 starters.

    That said, Rojas is one of the few I like to possibly be a #1-2 starter.

    Also, I’m glad this article points out that multi inning relievers are at the absolute bottom of the totem pole. Your most electric failed starters should be pushed to the high leverage situations. Your inning-eating, just-get-me-to-tomorrow pitchers should be the waiver wire fodder you don’t mind casting off in a month. 

    It all depends on what you think a #3 or #4 or #5 starter actually is. If you think a #5 starter is a Chris Paddack who isn't worth a roster spot, but keeps getting trotted out to the mound by an incompetent front office trying to wipe the egg off their face, then you're right. I'm talking about guys you actually want on the mound, not guys you play because you have to.

    For relievers from 2023-2025 who pitched 140+ innings (98 total relievers), adjusted for 60 innings
    1 averaged 1.9 fWAR or higher
    3 averaged 1.7 fWAR or higher
    7 averaged 1.5 fWAR or higher
    17 averaged 1.2 fWAR or higher
    28 averaged 1.0 fWAR or higher

    BaseballTradeValues has gotten pretty good with ballparking trade value.

    (Expected WAR) * $8.0MM - (Expected SalaryMM) = Surplus Value

    There's a little wiggle room on the 8.00 factor, but the end result doesn't vary a lot since relievers don't generate a lot of WAR.

    On 7/5/2026 at 10:00 AM, bean5302 said:

    It all depends on what you think a #3 or #4 or #5 starter actually is. If you think a #5 starter is a Chris Paddack who isn't worth a roster spot, but keeps getting trotted out to the mound by an incompetent front office trying to wipe the egg off their face, then you're right. I'm talking about guys you actually want on the mound, not guys you play because you have to.

    For relievers from 2023-2025 who pitched 140+ innings (98 total relievers), adjusted for 60 innings
    1 averaged 1.9 fWAR or higher
    3 averaged 1.7 fWAR or higher
    7 averaged 1.5 fWAR or higher
    17 averaged 1.2 fWAR or higher
    28 averaged 1.0 fWAR or higher

    BaseballTradeValues has gotten pretty good with ballparking trade value.

    (Expected WAR) * $8.0MM - (Expected SalaryMM) = Surplus Value

    There's a little wiggle room on the 8.00 factor, but the end result doesn't vary a lot since relievers don't generate a lot of WAR.

    Duran had a 3.1 WAR last year and a 2.1 so far this year.

    And so what? WAR isn’t a helpful stat, particularly in this case since it’s cumulative and relievers are almost entirely valued based on if, when and how they pitch in the team’s highest leverage situations of the season.

    Teams aren’t, or at least shouldn’t be using WAR to compare positional value. You don’t seriously think peak Bailey Ober brings back Abel and Tait?




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...