Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Giving Out the Grades in Minnesota


    Ted Schwerzler

    Sure, it’s only January but that’s become somewhat of a placeholder for fans to convince themselves that things are going to change. The reality is that we’re less than a month away from baseball being played in Fort Myers, and just over two weeks away from pitchers and catchers reporting. A few more moves could trickle in, but it’s time to evaluate the offseason as it is today.

    Image courtesy of © Jordan Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    There’s no denying that the Minnesota Twins are a better team today than they were when the 2018 Major League Baseball season concluded. There’s also little reason to believe there isn’t opportunity within the AL Central division. Those two reasons alone are why projection systems have Rocco Baldelli’s club trending towards a win total in the mid-80’s, and why there’s some frustration more hasn’t been done.

    Let’s get into it...

    New Acquisitions: Jonathan Schoop, C.J. Cron, Blake Parker, Nelson Cruz, Martin Perez

    Going into the winter, Minnesota’s most desperate needs were a middle infielder and bullpen help. They likely were going to need a bat to replace Joe Mauer at first base as well. Although each player has some level of control or second year possibility, the Twins went about adding talent on one-year commitments. Schoop is a better defender than Minnesota has recently had at 2B, and a rebound year would bring offensive prowess that would rival what the organization has grown used to. Cron should be an offensive step up for the Twins, and Nelson Cruz still is among the most feared hitters in baseball despite approaching 40.

    Parker isn’t a flashy name by any means, but he’s got previous closing experience and has put together a couple of strong years in recent seasons. Perez is the oddity in this bunch in that he both hasn’t been good before and has shown little indication that he may get there soon. Pegged as a starter, it’ll be interesting to see what his role looks like as the season progresses.

    Grade: B

    Coaching Additions: Rocco Baldelli, Wes Johnson, Tony Diaz, Jeremy Hefner, Tommy Watkins

    For everything that could be viewed as a negative on the player acquisition side, it’s in coaching and development that the Twins sustainability jumps off the page for me. Baldelli, while green, strikes me as a manager that could and will connect in a big way with this group. Johnson brings no big-league experience to speak of but has been revered among the best at the collegiate level. I’m not worried about the track record and think there’s an area of untapped potential that he can mine with the Twins pitchers. It’ll likely be a learning process in connecting with new faces, but the obstacle on the bridge between new ideas and buy-in is one that has held the Twins back in recent memory.

    Diaz could prove to be an integral part of a connection made between management and Latin players in the Minnesota clubhouse. Watkins played a key role in the development and graduation from prospect of many players currently on the active roster. Putting Hefner on the field after operating in more of a behind the scenes role will be an interesting development as well. Working as an assistant alongside Johnson, their effectiveness will likely directly correlate, in part, to how quickly they are on the same page as well.

    Grade: A-

    Resource Allocation: Current projected payroll $99 million

    Thus far the Twins have spent something like $35 million on new talent. Even with those additions, they’re nearly $30 million below the 2018 Opening Day payroll and well below the league average. A recent report from the Star Tribune’s LaVelle E. Neal suggests that Perez could be the last major league acquisition for this roster. Should that turn out to be the case, there’s no way to spin it other than calling it embarrassing.

    Recently Twins President Dave St. Peter was on the recently rebranded Skor North discussing the state of the 2019 squad. He chided payroll comments saying “(fans) only argument is payroll, we’ve heard it a long time, and it’s something we’ll have to put up with.” He went on to say, “I have confidence that not only are we going in with a better team than we had last year, but it's a team that can ultimately, hopefully hunt down Cleveland in the AL Central in 2019." The problem is that these two statements suggest an inability to grasp what the real issue is.

    No Twins fan cares whether the payroll is $200 million or $100 million. Also, no one has an expectation that the local club is going to spend with the likes of Los Angeles or New York. What does matter however, is that there’s more work to be done on this roster, there were (and are) assets capable of completing that work, and the front office is seemingly content with saying this is it. It’s all well and good for Minnesota to target competing with the Indians, but they’ve left plenty of juice still worth squeezing out.

    Grade: D-

    At the end of the day and knowing that the book-ended grades of this exercise remain pending until the dust truly settles, the Twins have a trio of definitive truths from this winter. The big-league product got better and can grow even more with some improvement and consistency from internal holdovers. The coaching staff and developmental group throughout the organization have been bolstered tremendously. Finally, there was more work to be done and a conscious decision to ignore that was made.

    It’d be great if this Twins team put together an 87-win season, but it would be plenty disheartening if a few games gap between the Indians was left open knowing the offseason had had more to offer.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Here's a look at where we stand as a team and compared to last year. 

     

    First base appears we have improved us on power front from Joe Mauer but in doing so we have lost on base percentage and definitely went backwards on defensive side of first base. The net result I think were slight loss overall at first base because we have weakened whole infield with what joe did defensively. Second base we added SChoop looking at it objectively  we have about traded even with what we had in Brian Dozier that is assuming that Schoop bounces back. SS we have Polanco should be improved when we have him for full year but defensively we will go back some because of first base. Third base with Sano this could be our biggest gain if the reports are right on him being healthy. I could see we have the player of two years ago. The big question can he recover his hitting skills if not were in serious trouble for the season. Catcher we will have Castro back but I think our future is with Garver and Astudillo I have feeling were going to see much more production from Catcher hitting than we have seen last few years. Left field with Rosario should stay same with improving as major league player. Center Field we will be better there defensively with Buxton and I can't help that he's going to hit for at least 230 to 250 mark this year which will be acceptable with all his other skills. Right field Kepler I believe is the player that will have breakout season hitting and defensively will continue to improve. DH is biggest improvement on this team with Cruz we will be getting increase in offense.  Pitching I Think we will have adequate starting pitching to compete especially in AL central. Relief pitching is going to be process of finding right combinations of people I believe the Twins front office has come to decision to explore what we have in the farm system and anything they can pickup before season opens up. Overall I think we could see improvement in the team but my guess is were sitting with 80 to 82 win team. This is not enough to make to playoffs but would be a third best season in over decade. If I was grading this front office they have made necessary moves to keep competent team on the field if the core responds but in doing so they have cost us any chance of making a play off run if this core suddenly gels and probably may have cost us chance at the playoffs. My grading process player additions C, coaching staff I would give them B- with new manager plus but I have severe reservations about pitching coaches hired may just see where we start seeing more career ending injuries for all this allusive need for velocity; and finally overall Front office use of resources I would give a grade of D- because well knowing where we are if the core produces we are on way to having contender but just sit wait to me is great mistake opportunities only come around few times for major league club and when they do have to take the risk and the faith in your players and people you hired to get the job done. This front office lacks the confidence to believe in their players and unwilling to risk their reputations  going forth with a plan to win it all and if don't believe that then you need to blow it up and start over. But this sitting on your hands and hoping things turn around is worst position to be in because your neither progressing or getting worse your just wasting time of players and fans. I believe it comes down to either you believe in what you got or you don't its simple as that when you have made that decision you go out use all your resources to win or if not tearing it down putting plans together to rebuild the club in next couple of years.  This is where we are now not where I would want to be if was trying to sell this club to the public. 

    Here's a look at where we stand as a team and compared to last year.

     

    First base appears we have improved us on power front from Joe Mauer but in doing so we have lost on base percentage and definitely went backwards on defensive side of first base. The net result I think were slight loss overall at first base because we have weakened whole infield with what joe did defensively. Second base we added SChoop looking at it objectively we have about traded even with what we had in Brian Dozier that is assuming that Schoop bounces back. SS we have Polanco should be improved when we have him for full year but defensively we will go back some because of first base. Third base with Sano this could be our biggest gain if the reports are right on him being healthy. I could see we have the player of two years ago. The big question can he recover his hitting skills if not were in serious trouble for the season. Catcher we will have Castro back but I think our future is with Garver and Astudillo I have feeling were going to see much more production from Catcher hitting than we have seen last few years. Left field with Rosario should stay same with improving as major league player. Center Field we will be better there defensively with Buxton and I can't help that he's going to hit for at least 230 to 250 mark this year which will be acceptable with all his other skills. Right field Kepler I believe is the player that will have breakout season hitting and defensively will continue to improve. DH is biggest improvement on this team with Cruz we will be getting increase in offense. Pitching I Think we will have adequate starting pitching to compete especially in AL central. Relief pitching is going to be process of finding right combinations of people I believe the Twins front office has come to decision to explore what we have in the farm system and anything they can pickup before season opens up. Overall I think we could see improvement in the team but my guess is were sitting with 80 to 82 win team. This is not enough to make to playoffs but would be a third best season in over decade. If I was grading this front office they have made necessary moves to keep competent team on the field if the core responds but in doing so they have cost us any chance of making a play off run if this core suddenly gels and probably may have cost us chance at the playoffs. My grading process player additions C, coaching staff I would give them B- with new manager plus but I have severe reservations about pitching coaches hired may just see where we start seeing more career ending injuries for all this allusive need for velocity; and finally overall Front office use of resources I would give a grade of D- because well knowing where we are if the core produces we are on way to having contender but just sit wait to me is great mistake opportunities only come around few times for major league club and when they do have to take the risk and the faith in your players and people you hired to get the job done. This front office lacks the confidence to believe in their players and unwilling to risk their reputations going forth with a plan to win it all and if don't believe that then you need to blow it up and start over. But this sitting on your hands and hoping things turn around is worst position to be in because your neither progressing or getting worse your just wasting time of players and fans. I believe it comes down to either you believe in what you got or you don't its simple as that when you have made that decision you go out use all your resources to win or if not tearing it down putting plans together to rebuild the club in next couple of years. This is where we are now not where I would want to be if was trying to sell this club to the public.

    The Twins had all of August and September to evaluate minor league relievers. Instead, they chose to give innings to Matt Belisle, Matt Magill, Oliver Drake, et al. If the Twins are planning to use last year’s minor leaguers in key relief roles this year, they should have been at the MLB level last year.

    Here's a look at where we stand as a team and compared to last year.

     

    First base appears we have improved us on power front from Joe Mauer but in doing so we have lost on base percentage and definitely went backwards on defensive side of first base. The net result I think were slight loss overall at first base because we have weakened whole infield with what joe did defensively. Second base we added SChoop looking at it objectively we have about traded even with what we had in Brian Dozier that is assuming that Schoop bounces back. SS we have Polanco should be improved when we have him for full year but defensively we will go back some because of first base. Third base with Sano this could be our biggest gain if the reports are right on him being healthy. I could see we have the player of two years ago. The big question can he recover his hitting skills if not were in serious trouble for the season. Catcher we will have Castro back but I think our future is with Garver and Astudillo I have feeling were going to see much more production from Catcher hitting than we have seen last few years. Left field with Rosario should stay same with improving as major league player. Center Field we will be better there defensively with Buxton and I can't help that he's going to hit for at least 230 to 250 mark this year which will be acceptable with all his other skills. Right field Kepler I believe is the player that will have breakout season hitting and defensively will continue to improve. DH is biggest improvement on this team with Cruz we will be getting increase in offense. Pitching I Think we will have adequate starting pitching to compete especially in AL central. Relief pitching is going to be process of finding right combinations of people I believe the Twins front office has come to decision to explore what we have in the farm system and anything they can pickup before season opens up. Overall I think we could see improvement in the team but my guess is were sitting with 80 to 82 win team. This is not enough to make to playoffs but would be a third best season in over decade. If I was grading this front office they have made necessary moves to keep competent team on the field if the core responds but in doing so they have cost us any chance of making a play off run if this core suddenly gels and probably may have cost us chance at the playoffs. My grading process player additions C, coaching staff I would give them B- with new manager plus but I have severe reservations about pitching coaches hired may just see where we start seeing more career ending injuries for all this allusive need for velocity; and finally overall Front office use of resources I would give a grade of D- because well knowing where we are if the core produces we are on way to having contender but just sit wait to me is great mistake opportunities only come around few times for major league club and when they do have to take the risk and the faith in your players and people you hired to get the job done. This front office lacks the confidence to believe in their players and unwilling to risk their reputations going forth with a plan to win it all and if don't believe that then you need to blow it up and start over. But this sitting on your hands and hoping things turn around is worst position to be in because your neither progressing or getting worse your just wasting time of players and fans. I believe it comes down to either you believe in what you got or you don't its simple as that when you have made that decision you go out use all your resources to win or if not tearing it down putting plans together to rebuild the club in next couple of years. This is where we are now not where I would want to be if was trying to sell this club to the public.

    I agree with you prediction. Considering Detroit, KC (both 100 loss candidates again) and Cleveland went backwards this offseason and ChiSox have so far basically treaded water, 80-82 wins is going backwards for the Twins. Im not ok with 80-82 wins

     

    Agreed on the indecisive nature of the FO. It’s maddening

    I also have a hard time with the 80 - 82 win projection.  Bullpen is the key and I like a lot of the rest are concerned here.  Twins I believe blew somewhere in the neighborhood of 25 saves last year.  4 - 5 blown saves in April could set this team a long way back with more a of 'here we go again' type of mentaility. I would take great pains to avoid this line.  I understand the relievers could be good or bad, but this division is up for grabs and Twins should be making more moves.  I like the new coaching staff, but it should be given an incomplete until we see how in works in game situations.  Resource allocation seems to be light, but would wait until middle spring training to see how it works out.

    Just no more after spring training is 2 weeks old signing players and bringing them in, they just do not seem to be ready by the season opener.

    I also have a hard time with the 80 - 82 win projection. Bullpen is the key and I like a lot of the rest are concerned here. Twins I believe blew somewhere in the neighborhood of 25 saves last year. 4 - 5 blown saves in April could set this team a long way back with more a of 'here we go again' type of mentaility. I would take great pains to avoid this line. I understand the relievers could be good or bad, but this division is up for grabs and Twins should be making more moves. I like the new coaching staff, but it should be given an incomplete until we see how in works in game situations. Resource allocation seems to be light, but would wait until middle spring training to see how it works out.

    Just no more after spring training is 2 weeks old signing players and bringing them in, they just do not seem to be ready by the season opener.

    agreed, but would propose expanding the scope of weakness. Pitching (not just bullpen) has significant risk of costing games early in the season. I don’t trust Pineda, I am negative on Perez and worry he’ll continue to be a primary pitcher while the coaching staff tries with futility to remake him, and Odorizzi his good for 5 innings. They’re going to blow through a ton of long relief innings and need to score a bunch, before we ever get to the setup man and closer.

     

    I’m good with closer and kinda doubt they have one established closer. Between May, and Rogers we’re ok to good there and if Reed bounces back we’re set. It’s the high leverage fireman and setup man I’m concerned with. Theres a few guys that can get through a clean inning, I’m struggling to identify anyone to get you out of a jamb.

     

    Looking forward to some touch downs this summer

     

    I also have a hard time with the 80 - 82 win projection.  Bullpen is the key and I like a lot of the rest are concerned here.  Twins I believe blew somewhere in the neighborhood of 25 saves last year.  4 - 5 blown saves in April could set this team a long way back with more a of 'here we go again' type of mentaility. I would take great pains to avoid this line.  I understand the relievers could be good or bad, but this division is up for grabs and Twins should be making more moves.  I like the new coaching staff, but it should be given an incomplete until we see how in works in game situations.  Resource allocation seems to be light, but would wait until middle spring training to see how it works out.

    Just no more after spring training is 2 weeks old signing players and bringing them in, they just do not seem to be ready by the season opener.

    28 BS  That is concerning. It is hard to say if it is a bad as you think. The Orioles and White Sox each had only 18 BS. They also as a team lost over 100 games. The Brewers 25 and the Dodgers 26 were near what the Twins had. They were in the playoffs.

     

    28 BS  That is concerning. It is hard to say if it is a bad as you think. The Orioles and White Sox each had only 18 BS. They also as a team lost over 100 games. The Brewers 25 and the Dodgers 26 were near what the Twins had. They were in the playoffs.

    More worried about the mental state if Twins blow a bunch of saves early.  Stat says you were ahead, something the White Sox and Orioles were not.  Dodgers stat was because of Jansen struggles and missing early, Brewiers also until they got their bullpen sorted out and used more of Hader.  

     

    More worried about the mental state if Twins blow a bunch of saves early.  Stat says you were ahead, something the White Sox and Orioles were not.  Dodgers stat was because of Jansen struggles and missing early, Brewiers also until they got their bullpen sorted out and used more of Hader.  

    Jansen had only 4 BS. Contributing cause, but not really considering his peripheral numbers were not horrid. Chargois also had 4 in 39 IP. Each had 1 bad number 1.63 and 1.11 HR/9

    Hader had 5 and thus not the reason the Brewers had less blown saves.  Saves, blown saves, wins loses are more a reflection of team. Hader and Jeffers each had 5 blown saves. Each also had sub 3 fip.

    The teams with the least blown saves also had the starters with the most losses. It is very hard to lose a lead you do not have.

    It doesn’t seem like blown saves is a very useful data point to support an argument. Bad teams don’t have as many opportunities and good teams more often have bigger leads.

     

    I don’t think we need anything to support that the Twins bullpen doesn’t look very competitive at this point. It appears the bullpen is going to cost the team wins next year and it certainly did early last year when the Twins were on the losing side of a bunch of close games.

     

    The Twins had all of August and September to evaluate minor league relievers. Instead, they chose to give innings to Matt Belisle, Matt Magill, Oliver Drake, et al. If the Twins are planning to use last year’s minor leaguers in key relief roles this year, they should have been at the MLB level last year.

     

    Would you not think this is a significant reason Paul Molitor is not the manager any longer?

    Our cheap controllable talent won't be as cheap and will be losing years of control soon. We don't have much of a choice but to go for things now, imo.

     

    Given that this core has made 1 run and we've been building toward this year, that we have the money, that we've added no one for the future, and that we've extended no one either, I don't see how we can give something other than an F at this time. How expensive will an OF of Buck, Rosie, and Kep be in 2 years? Would you rather have that OF or Harper, Garver, and Field then Kiroloff in 2 years? Plus the prospects you get by trading your current OF.

    Edited by Jham



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...