Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Did Pohlads' Pivot on Minnesota Twins Sale Lead to Rocco Baldelli Being Fired?

    Here's why Minnesota’s ownership's change of plans may have sealed its manager’s fate.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Matt Blewett-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The Minnesota Twins made headlines Monday, by announcing they were parting ways with manager Rocco Baldelli following another playoff miss, a fourth in the last five years. Baldelli was hardly the primary issue over this stretch, but the organization had already exhausted its other scapegoats. 

    Last offseason, the Twins cleaned house on the hitting side, firing coaches across the board. David Popkins was quickly hired for the same job with the Toronto Blue Jays and helped that club win a competitive AL East division this season. On the front office side, the Twins moved on from general manager Thad Levine, allowing them to promote others from within the organization. That left Baldelli as the next logical choice. Still, his dismissal might have been written weeks earlier, when the Pohlad family unexpectedly pulled the club off the market and recommitted themselves as majority owners.

    A Different Timeline With a Sale
    Had the Twins’ ownership sale gone through as planned initially, it would have made sense to keep Baldelli in place at least through the 2026 season. His contract extension had already been picked up. A carryover manager would have given a new ownership group time to learn the inner workings of the organization while providing stability in the dugout. 

    It also would have been pragmatic. Minnesota’s current roster construction doesn’t point to a likely playoff run in 2026, unless something drastic changes. There’s talk that the team could potentially trade Pablo López and/or Joe Ryan, making it even more difficult to compete in the AL Central. If the club underperformed again, new owners could have cut ties with Baldelli at that point and made their own hire without rushing into a decision.

    Instead, the Pohlads’ renewed presence changed the calculation. Once they reaffirmed their control, the clock sped up. Patience became less of a virtue and more of a liability, especially after back-to-back disappointing campaigns in 2024 and 2025.

    Appeasing the Fan Base
    For years, a portion of the Twins’ fan base has loudly called for a change in the manager’s seat. Social media and comment sections have long been filled with critiques of Baldelli’s bullpen usage, lineup construction, and reliance on organizational philosophies. By moving on from him now, the Twins can appease that vocal group and give the appearance of a fresh start.

    A new manager may provide a short-term spark, if only by virtue of being different. There’s always excitement around a new face in the dugout, and that novelty can buy both the team and front office a bit of goodwill. Still, the grass isn’t always greener on the other side. The Twins’ underlying roster issues remain, and no managerial change can magically transform the talent level of the current core. If the same problems surface in 2026, fan frustrations will quickly shift from the manager’s office back to the front office and ownership.

    Falvey’s Last Card to Play
    With the sale off the table, Derek Falvey’s position as president of baseball operations seems secure for now, but the pressure has never been greater. Ownership has little appetite to hit reset at the top of the front office, after already committing to him as their lead decision-maker. That left one final ace card to play: firing the manager. Baldelli’s dismissal was as much about optics as performance.

    The reality is that Falvey is now running out of levers to pull. His influence spans both baseball and business operations, meaning that dwindling attendance and sagging revenue will be directly tied to him moving forward. Baldelli’s exit removes the last convenient shield, leaving Falvey as the ultimate target if things don’t turn around soon.

    What It Means for the Future
    The Pohlad pivot ended Baldelli’s tenure and reshaped the Twins’ trajectory. By choosing to hold onto the club, ownership signaled that short-term results now matter more than ever. A manager once seen as a stabilizer through transition became expendable. This is especially telling for an ownership group that has been loyal to managers through some rough seasons. Falvey, meanwhile, has bought himself time, but only in the short term.

    For fans, this all sets the stage for a pivotal 2026 season. The Twins will either prove they can retool and compete under current leadership, or the Pohlad family may be forced into the most difficult decision of all by moving on from the architect of the “Falvey era.”

    Either way, Baldelli’s firing serves as the clearest reminder yet: when ownership changes direction, the fallout is felt from the top of the dugout all the way down to the turnstiles.


    Do you believe the Pohlads' decision to keep the team led to Baldelli's firing? 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    19 hours ago, 4twinsJA said:

    Twins will not be very good next year.

    I still think that the Twins COULD be very good next year. A few tweaks and it might be another last to first scenario. A lot of work to do sure, but not such a far-fetched idea. 

    15 hours ago, bloomwcjkl said:

    Even if they didn't win much, I did enjoy the post fire sale Twins.

    Keaschal, Lee, Martin, Clemens

    My expectations are low (also see MN Vikings) but it was a fun squad to watch.

    I enjoyed followed the post-fire sale Twins too. But I'm not sold on the idea that watching Lee is "fun" in any way. 

    18 hours ago, USAFChief said:

    No.

     

    Rocco's performance as an MLB manager led to Rocco being fired.

     

    Agreed, though firing Rocco now seems a little confusing. Is he being fired for this year's performance? Is this just the delayed firing from last year's collapse (not to mention the collapse of '22)? I can't think of one experienced manager who would want the job considering the current front office and projected payroll reductions. Seems to me that keeping Rocco (who is already contracted to get paid) would have been a better fit for the current "plans" unless you think winning is any part of ownership's goal here.

    The surprise is not that he was fired. It's how he stayed in the job for 7 seasons, enough to become the 3rd most winning Twins manager? 

    There's far too much job security in the Twins organization. Probably why they have a culture that doesn't emphasize winning. 

    14 hours ago, The Great Hambino said:

    There's no way they fired him for the team's performance over the last two months, so the decision to let him go must've been made at the trade deadline.

    The pivot on the sale happened after the trade deadline.

    Ergo, the pivot did not affect Rocco's job status

    I agree with this assessment.  What I don't understand is why not fire Baldelli at the same time as the fire sale?  Staying on had to be like walking across hot coals for two months.  If you plan on firing they guy, do it.  And now we read that Falvey doesn't have a plan yet for what he wants out of his new manager.  How can that be?  Leaders must always have a plan B in their back pocket.  In this case, it should mean he knew the attributes he was looking for as well as a number of candidates.  This is almost as bad as Joe Pohlad being surprised when his TV deal went south and he hadn't worked on a plan B already.   

    It's been Amateur hour with the Twins leadership.  The Twins need professionals running the organization, not this bunch.  With Joe Pohlad and Derek Falvey, they are the Frankentwins.

    3 hours ago, Doctor Wu said:

    I still think that the Twins COULD be very good next year. A few tweaks and it might be another last to first scenario. A lot of work to do sure, but not such a far-fetched idea. 

    Starting pitching could be quite good and hitting could improve with luck and tweaks.  But the relief pitching is virtually naked.  Outside of Funderburk, I'm not sure I like any of them.  Maybe Topa?  Sands was pretty bad...maybe give him another role?  Translation, the bullpen needs much more than Tweaking.

    21 hours ago, nicksaviking said:

    Listening to Falvey's press conference now. 

    Darren Wolfson: "OK so why fire him?"

    Falvey: "That's a good question Doogie. Uh that's a conversation that works directly with ownership uh and ultimately a collaborative conversation for the right reasons to make the change."

    Dissecting that word salad says that the decision was made by ownership, not Falvey.

    All the more reason Falvey should be gone as well. 

    18 hours ago, Jeff K said:

    Starting pitching could be quite good and hitting could improve with luck and tweaks.  But the relief pitching is virtually naked.  Outside of Funderburk, I'm not sure I like any of them.  Maybe Topa?  Sands was pretty bad...maybe give him another role?  Translation, the bullpen needs much more than Tweaking.

    Ha! You are right. "Tweaking" was probably not the best word to use. We need a bunch of good arms and soon. Maybe some of the AAA starters can be converted to relief duty, but we will need a few veteran arms too I would think. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...