Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Cleaning Up the Twins’ 40-Man Roster: Who Stays? Who Goes?

    Minnesota must make several difficult roster decisions this offseason, as injured players return to the roster and the organization evaluates which pieces belong in its plans.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Every big-league team faces an important roster challenge at the end of the season. Clubs must prepare for free agency, evaluate their organizational depth, and determine which players deserve a spot on the 40-man roster heading into the winter. For the Minnesota Twins, this process will require several decisions that could shape the team's roster heading into the 2027 season.

    The Twins currently have 46 players on their 40-man roster, including six pitchers on the 60-day injured list. Those injured players must be accounted for, because at the end of the World Series, they'll have to be placed back on the 40-man list. Minnesota also has several players who finished the season on the roster but might not fit into the organization's long-term plans.

    With four players eligible for free agency and several others facing uncertain futures, the Twins have plenty of work ahead. Some decisions will be straightforward, while others could involve moving on from players who have contributed at the major-league level.

    Pending Free Agents

    Josh Bell, Ryan Jeffers, A.J. Minter, and Taylor Rogers headline Minnesota's group of pending free agents. Each player presents a different dilemma, as the Twins determine how to allocate their offseason resources.

    Jeffers is arguably the most significant decision point. Minnesota could extend him a qualifying offer and see whether he accepts a one-year contract worth approximately $23 million. That would give the Twins a chance to retain an established catcher, without committing to a multi-year deal. However, Jeffers could have a strong market as a free agent, making a multi-year contract with another organization a realistic possibility.

    Bell was a useful offensive presence during his time with Minnesota, leading the team in runs batted in. However, his lack of defensive value limits his versatility. The Twins could look for a more robust bat this offseason while rotating players through the designated hitter spot. Part of their reason for signing him last winter was that Derek Shelton respected and valued his clubhouse gravitas, but that consideration now needs to take a back seat. Bringing Bell back would make sense only if the organization believes his production justifies the roster spot and financial commitment.

    Minter was a solid addition at the trade deadline. The Twins should look to add a reliever of his caliber this winter, whether that means negotiating a new deal with Minter or finding a comparable arm elsewhere. Bullpen depth is important, but Minnesota must balance that need against its available payroll.

    Rogers has indicated that he wants to continue pitching in 2027. However, a return to Minnesota seems unlikely. The Twins need to aim higher; there's little left in Rogers's tank.

    Injured Players Returning to the Roster

    Mick Abel, Anthony Banda, Pablo López, David Festa, Mike Paredes, and Cole Sands are the pitchers who must be accounted for as Minnesota clears its 60-day injured list spots; that list doesn't exist during the offseason. Several of these decisions should be relatively easy. López remains a key part of the rotation, while Abel and Paredes are pitching options the organization will want to evaluate. However, Banda, Sands, and Festa are more complicated cases.

    Banda is not expected to return to the field until July and is projected to earn approximately $2.3 million through arbitration. That creates a difficult calculation for a team that needs bullpen help, but might not receive much immediate value from the left-hander. Minnesota could decide that his experience and potential contributions later in the season justify the cost. Alternatively, the front office could use that roster spot and salary on a healthier option.

    Sands is projected to earn approximately $1.3 million through arbitration. He broke out in 2024, establishing himself as a useful bullpen arm, but his performance has declined since then due to injuries. The Twins must decide whether they believe he can rediscover that form, or whether his recent struggles suggest it's time to move on. Unless he's willing to sign for something closer to the league minimum, he's unlikely to return—but such deals are relatively common, in situations like this.

    Festa's case is different because he remains pre-arbitration eligible. His salary is not the primary concern, but injuries have limited his availability over the past two seasons. Minnesota must determine whether he can still develop into a dependable major-league starter or whether another pitcher deserves the opportunity.

    Other Pitchers the Twins Could Drop

    Garrett Acton, Jack Anderson, Eric Orze, and Marco Raya are additional candidates to lose their roster spots. The Twins need to maintain a deep collection of pitchers throughout the organization, but not every arm needs to occupy a 40-man roster spot. Minnesota can continue developing players in the minor leagues without protecting all of them from the Rule 5 Draft.

    Acton, Anderson, and Orze have opportunities to make their cases, but they are competing for limited space. The front office must determine whether their potential contributions justify protecting them over other pitchers who might be available through trades, waivers, or free agency.

    Raya presents the most interesting decision among this group. He's been one of Minnesota's more prominent pitching prospects for multiple seasons, but has yet to put everything together in the upper levels of the minor leagues. His development has not followed the trajectory the organization once hoped for, and there are questions about his performance since shifting to the bullpen.

    The Twins could give Raya another opportunity to develop, especially if they believe his raw ability remains worth protecting. However, moving him into a relief role is not necessarily a simple solution. If Minnesota doesn't believe he can succeed in a relief role at the major-league level, they could decide to open his roster spot for someone with a clearer path to contributing.

    These decisions are particularly important, because the Twins will need multiple bullpen options in 2027. The goal should be to retain pitchers who have a realistic chance of helping the major-league club, as well as being optionable and affordable.

    Other Position Players the Twins Could Drop

    Ben Ross, Aaron Sabato, Matt Wallner, Trevor Larnach, Royce Lewis, and Austin Martin round out the group of players who could be considered for removal. Ross and Sabato received opportunities with the major-league club late in the season, but those promotions felt more like courtesy call-ups than the beginning of a long-term role. Ross could still compete for a backup infield job next season, particularly if the Twins value his defensive versatility. Sabato appears to be the easiest decision among this group. He's spent years in the organization trying to establish himself as a viable option, but his path to a regular role remains unclear.

    Wallner's future is another situation worth watching. After struggling with the Twins, he spent the remainder of the season at Triple-A. His offensive potential has been evident, but he has not consistently translated that ability into major-league production. The writing is on the wall with this one; consider it an open spot.

    Larnach, Lewis, and Martin are more complicated decisions, because each has a different combination of experience, potential, and contractual considerations. Larnach remains under team control through arbitration, giving Minnesota a chance to retain him without making a long-term commitment. His skill set feels redundant, though. Other players who fit his profile are more important to the franchise.

    Lewis is the most recognizable name in this group, but he hasn't been a consistently productive big-leaguers since the middle of 2024. He's more headache than headliner, but getting rid of a headache often requires swallowing a bitter pill.

    Martin has yet to reach arbitration, making him an inexpensive option. He has a sufficiently patient approach to maintain a high floor for offensive value, but his ceiling is very low—and, try as he might, he's still not looking like a plus defender, even in left field.

    The Twins appear to have several players with higher ceilings or who are better fits for the roles these six players might occupy. A couple of them could survive the autumn reaping, but most of the group will slough off before December.

    The Twins Need to Make Room for the Future

    Clearing roster spots is only the first step. The organization must also decide how those spots will be used. Retaining too many fringe players could limit the team's flexibility when opportunities emerge through free agency, trades, or the waiver wire. Some decisions will be difficult, because Wallner, Lewis, and Raya still have intriguing potential. Others (including Sabato and some of the fringe pitching options) might be easier to move on from. The injured pitchers pose financial and developmental questions that the front office must weigh carefully.

    If Minnesota wants to build a more competitive roster in 2027, it must be willing to move on from players who no longer fit its plans and use that flexibility to pursue better options. The 40-man roster cleanup is an early but important part of that process. The decisions made this winter could determine how much flexibility the Twins have when the more significant opportunities of the offseason arrive.


    Who would you remove from the 40-man roster? Leave a comment and start the discussion.


    Want to play the role of Twins general manager? Check out our free-to-use "You're The GM" offseason tool and build your own Twins roster!

    Build Your 2027 Roster
    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    It's not going to be hard to get down to the 40-man limit. There's 10-11 fairly easy calls, so if all you need is to get down to 40 no one is going to lose any sleep.

    None of the pending FA's will end up on the 40-man: they're free agents. While I'd like to keep Jeffers and Minter, Bell and Rogers are for sure gone. Banda, Acton, Anderson, Orze, Larnach, Wallner, and Gray...pick 4 more if you want to assume that we're re-signing 2 of the FA's?

    Should be pretty easy to get down to 37, protect a couple of Rule 5 candidates (assuming there even is a Rule 5) and/or open a couple of spaces for FA. 

    They'll probably keep Larnach and Wallner for a while and hope they can make a trade with either of them, but they'll get down to the early limit easily with FA and some of the chaff. (I'd designate Banda early; doubt anyone picks him off waivers if he's not going to pitch until June. Toss in Orze and we're there until we hopefully move on from Wallner, Larnach, and Gray after finding no takers in trade)

    I feel like I know most of what there is to know about rosters, options, arbitration, etc.... but I don't know the answer to this...

    Could we sign Banda. right now, to a $2.0M minor league deal? With the goal being, keep him off the 40-man roster until he's healthy in the middle of next season?

    If not, what rule prevents it?

    The single most important criteria to be on the 40 man roster is simply: by being on the 40 does that player help build a more competitive roster for ‘28-‘30.

    Players on the 40 this off season should fall into one of three categories:

    1. They are slotted to be contributors starting in ‘28.

    2. They could be contributors in ‘28-‘30.

    3. They can be traded for players who would fall into one of the two above categories.

    Everyone else can be jettisoned.

    Keep on 40-man (34):
    --- Bold players are the next wave I'm willing to part with if needed ---
    Mick Abel
    Travis Adams
    Jack Anderson
    Anthony Banda
    Taj Bradley
    David Festa
    Kody Funderburk
    Yoendrys Gómez
    Jeff Hoffman
    Dean Kremer
    Pablo López
    Zebby Matthews
    Andrew Morris
    Tommy Nance
    Mike Paredes
    Connor Prielipp
    Marco Raya
    Kendry Rojas
    Joe Ryan
    Cole Sands
    Victor Caratini
    Kody Clemens
    Kaelen Culpepper
    Luke Keaschall
    Ryan Kreidler
    Brooks Lee
    Ben Ross
    Byron Buxton
    Gabriel Gonzalez
    Walker Jenkins
    Austin Martin
    Hendry Mendez
    Alan Roden
    Emmanuel Rodriguez

    Attempt to trade but keep on 40 man if you can't (1):
    Royce Lewis

    Attempt to trade and remove from 40 man if you can't (3):
    Bailey Ober
    Trevor Larnach
    Matt Wallner

    Free Agents, some of whom I'd have back, but for now are off the 40-man (4):
    AJ Minter
    Taylor Rogers
    Ryan Jeffers
    Josh Bell

    Remove from 40-man (4):
    Garrett Acton
    Eric Orze
    Tristan Gray
    Aaron Sabato

    5 hours ago, Cory Engelhardt said:

    If Josh Bell were Tony Oliva instead I would agree with you

    it seems like everybody but me does not like Josh Bell in his 96 runs batted in. neither one of these people could play the field. I remember the night listening on the radio telling you leave a dive for the ball and couldn't get up. he had torn his knee. never the same after that so he hit the first home run of the designated hitter age.

    15 minutes ago, killercarewoliva said:

    it seems like everybody but me does not like Josh Bell in his 96 runs batted in. neither one of these people could play the field. I remember the night listening on the radio telling you leave a dive for the ball and couldn't get up. he had torn his knee. never the same after that so he hit the first home run of the designated hitter age.

    Please know I like Josh Bell the player and the person. For the 2027 roster and how the team is set up now, I just don’t see a fit. IF we knew Buxton were to be healthy and play 130+ games in the field, I MIGHT feel different. But I can very much see Buxton playing some cf and a lot of DH next year. 
    If anything, Buxton is the Oliva of this team no? I certainly wouldn’t want Josh Bell to be in the lineup over a healthy Buxton. You agree with that, right?

    4 hours ago, Cory Engelhardt said:

    Please know I like Josh Bell the player and the person. For the 2027 roster and how the team is set up now, I just don’t see a fit. IF we knew Buxton were to be healthy and play 130+ games in the field, I MIGHT feel different. But I can very much see Buxton playing some cf and a lot of DH next year. 
    If anything, Buxton is the Oliva of this team no? I certainly wouldn’t want Josh Bell to be in the lineup over a healthy Buxton. You agree with that, right?

    so you were saying that? Josh Bell is going to lose his position on the team so Baron Buxton can have a place to play due to his lack of health to play the field which happens all the time. Buxton played an entire season at DH and he hated it. but like you say, he will go to DH if necessary to be a part of the team. the season before last. the one just passed. he got 83 runs batted in. so putting him in the same position as Bell. he was 13 runs batted in less valuable to the team than Bell. we saw Buxton have a terrible. was it final month of the season? something like that. he's striking out constantly and we you know attribute that to his hip issue. the guy is super tough and super loyal to the Minnesota twins, but what is best for Minnesota is for Buxton to alarm self to be traded for the good of the team. he is coddled every single season. no exceptions to that. as a huge fan of this organization since 1965 and he does all he can to stay on the field, but he doesn't stay on the field very well. with this in mind, we don't want to not think of the significance that Mr. Bell gives the team. I think it might be a matter of seeing how things are around the middle of March.

    1 hour ago, killercarewoliva said:

    so you were saying that? Josh Bell is going to lose his position on the team so Baron Buxton can have a place to play due to his lack of health to play the field which happens all the time. Buxton played an entire season at DH and he hated it. but like you say, he will go to DH if necessary to be a part of the team. the season before last. the one just passed. he got 83 runs batted in. so putting him in the same position as Bell. he was 13 runs batted in less valuable to the team than Bell. we saw Buxton have a terrible. was it final month of the season? something like that. he's striking out constantly and we you know attribute that to his hip issue. the guy is super tough and super loyal to the Minnesota twins, but what is best for Minnesota is for Buxton to alarm self to be traded for the good of the team. he is coddled every single season. no exceptions to that. as a huge fan of this organization since 1965 and he does all he can to stay on the field, but he doesn't stay on the field very well. with this in mind, we don't want to not think of the significance that Mr. Bell gives the team. I think it might be a matter of seeing how things are around the middle of March.

    Yeah, a healthy Buxton is 10 times the player Bell is. Hopefully his hip is recovered and he can play. But I do think he will get a good amount of DH at bats in 2027, along with hopefully helping in the field. 
    Josh Bell had a fine 2026. Below what I would expect from a DH only, but players liked him for sure. Not good enough to get his number retired, like I would imagine Buxton would after he retires 

    21 hours ago, killercarewoliva said:

    96 rbi. Tony Oliva was too hurt to play outfield but no way he would be released due to offense value. 

    Oliva was a DH  from 1973 to 1976 (and he was awful in 1976) and compares well to what Bell was last year. OPS+ of 109, 109, 103, WAR of .7, .4, .5. and the Twins went 81 -81, 82 - 80 -1, 76-83 and missed the playoffs every year,  In case you forgot the Twins went 77-85 last year and missed the playoffs.

    Bell would be a good guy to bring back if they Twins knew what they had in Erod, but they don't because they sent him to the minors to start the season last year and then got hurt and now he is out of options. You don't send your best prospect they have had in years (Jenkins) to the minors for a 34 year old DH. Buxton when healthy is way better player than Bell, and Keashall is a young cheap player that is also better than Bell. Clemens is a better hitter and fielder than Bell. So to keep Bell you have to sit a better player than him, how does that make sense? 

    You mentioned in a different post imagine if the Twins would still have some of the relief pitchers they let go, they let them go because they weren't performing and where out of options or where traded for players the Twins thought would be better. (That is how the 40 man works in baseball) 

    I would guess if the Twins were to trade Erod so there was a spot for Bell and in a year or two he become really good, you and others would say imagine if we still had him and forget the reason they had to trade him was because they kept Bell. Those are the tough choices teams have to make and teams all over the league have guys that would have looked good keeping but had a choice to make.

    For example the Twins sent Megill to the Brewers which opened up a spot for Brock Stewart in 2023, Stewart pitched in 28 games with an ERA of 0.65 and a WAR of 1.6 and the Twins won their first playoff game and series in decades. 

    Ronny Henriquez was DFA's because he was out of options and the Twins signed Harrison Bader and Danny Coulombe. 

    Cano (28) was traded in the Jorge Lopez trade at the deadline.

    Headrick was DFA's because he was terrible in 23 and 24 and the Twins signed vets like Bader and Ty France. 

    like or agree with those moves, that is how the 40 man and options work. 

     

    10 hours ago, Cory Engelhardt said:

    Yeah, a healthy Buxton is 10 times the player Bell is. Hopefully his hip is recovered and he can play. But I do think he will get a good amount of DH at bats in 2027, along with hopefully helping in the field. 
    Josh Bell had a fine 2026. Below what I would expect from a DH only, but players liked him for sure. Not good enough to get his number retired, like I would imagine Buxton would after he retires 

    I just think that you should not have to let go your top run batted in person. that has to be a way to figure out to play both people and that way would be for Buxton to remain healthy for an entire season for the first time at age 32 I think? so then we let go of Josh Bell thinking that Mr. Buxton is not going to play center field the entire year and that's pretty much true probably. I wonder what Byron would think with his opinion if he feels like he's going to have to be a DH that Bell bell and his 96 runs batted in should just be let go so he can be the DH. I don't know how excited he would be about that. but part of all this that we write on here is have some disagreements and do it. cordially.

    44 minutes ago, MapleGroveTwinsFan said:

    Oliva was a DH  from 1973 to 1976 (and he was awful in 1976) and compares well to what Bell was last year. OPS+ of 109, 109, 103, WAR of .7, .4, .5. and the Twins went 81 -81, 82 - 80 -1, 76-83 and missed the playoffs every year,  In case you forgot the Twins went 77-85 last year and missed the playoffs.

    Bell would be a good guy to bring back if they Twins knew what they had in Erod, but they don't because they sent him to the minors to start the season last year and then got hurt and now he is out of options. You don't send your best prospect they have had in years (Jenkins) to the minors for a 34 year old DH. Buxton when healthy is way better player than Bell, and Keashall is a young cheap player that is also better than Bell. Clemens is a better hitter and fielder than Bell. So to keep Bell you have to sit a better player than him, how does that make sense? 

    You mentioned in a different post imagine if the Twins would still have some of the relief pitchers they let go, they let them go because they weren't performing and where out of options or where traded for players the Twins thought would be better. (That is how the 40 man works in baseball) 

    I would guess if the Twins were to trade Erod so there was a spot for Bell and in a year or two he become really good, you and others would say imagine if we still had him and forget the reason they had to trade him was because they kept Bell. Those are the tough choices teams have to make and teams all over the league have guys that would have looked good keeping but had a choice to make.

    For example the Twins sent Megill to the Brewers which opened up a spot for Brock Stewart in 2023, Stewart pitched in 28 games with an ERA of 0.65 and a WAR of 1.6 and the Twins won their first playoff game and series in decades. 

    Ronny Henriquez was DFA's because he was out of options and the Twins signed Harrison Bader and Danny Coulombe. 

    Cano (28) was traded in the Jorge Lopez trade at the deadline.

    Headrick was DFA's because he was terrible in 23 and 24 and the Twins signed vets like Bader and Ty France. 

    like or agree with those moves, that is how the 40 man and options work. 

     

    there's a player. his name is Mike trout. Mr. Superstar there for a few years and he plays for a team that doesn't have any other Mike trouts on it. the point there is whoever the Superstar is, there's got to be eight other people and that's not the fault of any one player that you have a winning season or not. I did not have recollection of these guys that were let go. that turned out to be incredibly fantastic elsewhere. who the twins got for them or whatever, but it seems that the other organizations taught them how to pitch better than the twins coaching did because who saw that coming with Megill and headrick and so forth. My comment was not saying that the twins screwed up really bad. it was just that I was trying to say it would be nice to have them on the team as they are now as a player. nobody knew that Lopez was a mental case I guess and did terrible once he got to Minnesota. predicting baseball players is probably the hardest sport in the world to predict correctly, even some of the time. I just don't follow all those statistics as much as you do. maybe everybody follows it, but when it comes to pitching I'm still about earn run average. ultimately it's about how many runs you give up. whatever way you got there, you still have that same earned run average irregardless of those other statistics. some of them say well. it's not as bad as it looks when you look at this and that well it is to me that is your earned run average. The one thing that bothered me bad with all those people being lost was Louis varland. gosh he loved playing for the twins and right at the last 5 seconds I see him come up on the baseball channel gone and then the GM is on there during a game. we love Louie but we just couldn't pass this up. I feel they made a mistake although I do like Rojas and I think he can be a fantastic starter when he doesn't throw so many walks. okay that's what this is for. we can have disagreements and get along just fine. no big deal. Nice to talk about it. I don't really read over anything before I send it and I talk it.

    31 minutes ago, MapleGroveTwinsFan said:

    Oliva was a DH  from 1973 to 1976 (and he was awful in 1976) and compares well to what Bell was last year. OPS+ of 109, 109, 103, WAR of .7, .4, .5. and the Twins went 81 -81, 82 - 80 -1, 76-83 and missed the playoffs every year,  In case you forgot the Twins went 77-85 last year and missed the playoffs.

    Bell would be a good guy to bring back if they Twins knew what they had in Erod, but they don't because they sent him to the minors to start the season last year and then got hurt and now he is out of options. You don't send your best prospect they have had in years (Jenkins) to the minors for a 34 year old DH. Buxton when healthy is way better player than Bell, and Keashall is a young cheap player that is also better than Bell. Clemens is a better hitter and fielder than Bell. So to keep Bell you have to sit a better player than him, how does that make sense? 

    You mentioned in a different post imagine if the Twins would still have some of the relief pitchers they let go, they let them go because they weren't performing and where out of options or where traded for players the Twins thought would be better. (That is how the 40 man works in baseball) 

    I would guess if the Twins were to trade Erod so there was a spot for Bell and in a year or two he become really good, you and others would say imagine if we still had him and forget the reason they had to trade him was because they kept Bell. Those are the tough choices teams have to make and teams all over the league have guys that would have looked good keeping but had a choice to make.

    For example the Twins sent Megill to the Brewers which opened up a spot for Brock Stewart in 2023, Stewart pitched in 28 games with an ERA of 0.65 and a WAR of 1.6 and the Twins won their first playoff game and series in decades. 

    Ronny Henriquez was DFA's because he was out of options and the Twins signed Harrison Bader and Danny Coulombe. 

    Cano (28) was traded in the Jorge Lopez trade at the deadline.

    Headrick was DFA's because he was terrible in 23 and 24 and the Twins signed vets like Bader and Ty France. 

    like or agree with those moves, that is how the 40 man and options work. 

     

    Many of these moves point out the importance of having options and not foolishly wasting them. While it may not have mattered, the Twins used on option on SWR in September in one of his two good seasons so that they could look at someone starting a meaningless game long after they had been eliminated. Starting the clock early on Henriquez had him out of options at a young age. I remember he was the first Twin who was born in the 2000s. A similar case for Headrick, although as a college pitcher he was older. 

    Rodon and Martin continue to have options, which make them more valuable (and tradeable). Wallner, Kreidler and Gray are now out of options, making them considerably less valuable. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...