Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    A More Assertive Approach Has Kody Clemens Looking Like a Bat Twins Can Count On

    The track record says nepo-baby fringe player. The stat line says Quadruple-A bat, destined for the waiver wire. The real story with Kody Clemens is a bit more encouraging, though.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Matt Marton-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    In 301 plate appearances since coming to the Minnesota Twins, Kody Clemens is batting .211/.281/.426. That's better than his career numbers, believe it or not, but it's far shy of the standard for first basemen in the major leagues. Clemens has spent some time at second base and in left field, but he's essentiall a first baseman, so he'd need to hit much better than that to provide real on-field value—at least in a role as large as the one he's played this year.

    Dig a bit deeper, though, and the news gets a bit better. For instance, Baseball Prospectus offers a metric called DRC+. It's akin to wRC+ or OPS+, in that it attempts to describe holistic offensive contributions and uses a scale wherein 100 is average and higher is better. The difference is that it estimates expected contribution—which means correcting not just for park and league factors, but for some elements of batted-ball luck and swing decisions, and for the plate appearance-by-plate appearance level of competition faced. Clemens's DRC+ this year is 106, which indicates that his process at the plate has been much better than the outcomes imply.

    What, specifically, does that look like? Consider: Clemens is swinging at the first pitch 28.7% of the time this year, up from roughly 18% in each of the previous two seasons. He's going to the plate ready to tee off, and it's working gorgeously. He's batting .385/.407/.808 on the first pitch, and .410/.410/.949 in 0-1 counts. Being more aggressive is how he's gotten to much more power this year than in the past—even though the change is more about taking what pitchers give him than about a conscious shift into a different mode.

    "It’s what you’re seeing, honestly. I mean, be aggressive early in the count," Clemens said. "If he leaves one over the plate that you’re looking for, it’s a great time to swing. It depends, situationally, what your plan of attack is. If our starter is out there for a longer inning and you’re up trying to have a longer at-bat because he was out there for a while, it switches up, but if you get your pitch early in the count, it’s obviously great to go and get the barrel out there."

    That kind of mindset—ready to hit as soon as he gets a pitch he likes, but equally willing to work the count, not only for its own sake but to protect his teammates when needed—is why Joe Ryan called Clemens "one of the best teammates we've ever had in [the Twins clubhouse]," a sentiment echoed by several others in the room over the months since he arrived. He's been a team-first guy since arriving, which doesn't automatically make him a better hitter but does help foster the right culture in the dugout and on the field.

    It's also smart to be flexible. Clemens might sometimes be shielding his pitchers from having to go back to the mound mere moments after a long inning, but he's also tapped into the value of a bifurcated approach. If you get your pitch early, you have to attack it. If you don't, it makes sense to wait the pitcher out and force them to earn their way back into the count. To wit, Clemens is getting into 2-0 and 3-0 counts considerably more this year than in the last two, despite swinging more often on the first and second pitches. That means that when pitchers fall behind, he's not bailing them out.

    Clemens said he knows what to look for, and has tried to be more ready when what he's looking for comes. That means having an idea of what segment of the strike zone he wants to attack, but not locking in so tightly on one pitch type that he can't adjust and do damage if he gets a different offering that still enters his wheelhouse.

    "You’re looking for a pitch in a general area," he explained, "but us hitters, if they throw a slider that they popped outside and it’s gonna come to that same area and you recognize it, I think it’s instinctual for hitters to, say you’re sitting fastball middle-in or whatever and they accidentally leave a changeup up and it kind of falls over the plate, you can recognize that and react."

    Whether Clemens is part of the Twins' future or not, his developmental arc this season is important, if it indicates that the team has a hitting infrastructure that works. That very thing has been in question all year. Clemens, though, said the team has helped him know when to go up there hacking.

    "They've emphasized, this pitcher gives up a ton of damage in 0-0 counts, or be ready to hit early, because this is the most damage that he’s given up," Clemens said. "That’s what they've emphasized over the course of the season."

    Clemens might not be back next season, but the team could do much worse than him as a platoon bat off the bench. He's a positive influence in the clubhouse and a positive contributor to the lineup, thanks to his evolving approach and the way he thinks about and listens to others' ideas on hitting. This approach comes with a low ceiling for OBP and hinges on connecting frequently enough to get to all of his power, but Clemens has shown an ability to maximize the value of that way of doing things. The Twins need more players who get the most out of their skills, not fewer.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, Trov said:

    If Clemens is part of our plans going forward to be a regular anything, we can just give up on the next season too.  He had that quick flash when he came over and helped us win some games, but since he has been who he is. His May and July were good, but outside of those months he has been below replacement.  If they have plans to keep him next year and use him I have no faith in our team next year. 

    I could say the same about Gasper, Julien, Fitzgerald, Keirsey, Outman, McCusker, Miranda, Pereda, Vazquez and even Brooks Lee. That's 10 more guys on the 40-man roster who have an "upside" of 0 WAR replacement player. Lee is the only one who is young enough to expect more from, but it will have to be at the plate because he's a bad middle infielder.

    As bad as Clemens has been, he's 5th in WAR among players currently on the roster. Clemens will be around next season because they can't replace 12 guys in one offseason.

    34 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    I could say the same about Gasper, Julien, Fitzgerald, Keirsey, Outman, McCusker, Miranda, Pereda, Vazquez and even Brooks Lee. That's 10 more guys on the 40-man roster who have an "upside" of 0 WAR replacement player. Lee is the only one who is young enough to expect more from, but it will have to be at the plate because he's a bad middle infielder.

    As bad as Clemens has been, he's 5th in WAR among players currently on the roster. Clemens will be around next season because they can't replace 12 guys in one offseason.

    Ok. But this is just further evidence that 2026 is at least one more rebuilding year, not that Clemens is any good that any team should try to keep around. No good team would want him around, on account of him being a bad baseball player. 

     

    1 hour ago, NYCTK said:

    Ok. But this is just further evidence that 2026 is at least one more rebuilding year, not that Clemens is any good that any team should try to keep around. No good team would want him around, on account of him being a bad baseball player. 

    I believe this is true. They don't have a dozen guys ready to debut who have MLB starter upside. They have a few - Jenkins, Rodriguez, Gonzalez, Culpepper - and they're mostly outfielders. If they're really lucky, two of those guys will transition well to the majors in 2026.

    4 minutes ago, Twodogs said:

    He's hitting .211?  What's so assertive about that?  

    Because he's doing it while switching to first base  "Hey!  I'm not a middle infielder anymore.. How d'ya like me NOW?"  😀

    On 9/4/2025 at 7:05 PM, chpettit19 said:

    Low BABIP was the same excuse we heard for why the next season was going to be Kepler's season every year. He was always due for a breakout! It can be a sign of bad luck, but it isn't always. Kody Clemens is right on his career norms outside of 1 crazy month. He's putting up the same stats he always puts up. He's not an MLB player. He's not some 22-year-old rookie. 

    Wallner, on the other hand, has a batting average 50 pts below his career norm this year. People act like this is his norm, it isn't. He hit .259 with power last year. .249 with power the year before. People just assume he's always a .200 hitter because he strikes out more than they'd like.

    Kody Clemen's career line is .203/.260/.392/.651. Kody Clemen's 2025 line is .207/.278/.417/.694. And his line after his complete and utter outlier of a month of May is .191/.258/.368/.625. He's doing what he's always done. Be a non-MLB hitter. Which is why an actually good team waived him.

    The author used a theoretical number. The x-stats are also the theoretical numbers. Using babip as a predictor is theory. Nobody ever has a reason why the player is meeting the theoretical threshold. . 

    2 hours ago, old nurse said:

    The author used a theoretical number. The x-stats are also the theoretical numbers. Using babip as a predictor is theory. Nobody ever has a reason why the player is meeting the theoretical threshold. . 

    Many of us explained why Kepler wasn't meeting his. Too many grounders and pop ups. He hit too many balls that were easy outs so it made perfect sense that his BABIP was always low. Just looking at 1 stat (whether an expected stat or something like batting average) is never a good strategy. But people who actually dive into the stats as a whole actually do come up with answers on most player's struggles or successes.

    I agree, this article in general was wildly off target because he looked at 1 stat and didn't do any real digging into Clemens' overall performance. Which is disappointing because I think Matthew is actually one of the best writers on this site. 

    1 hour ago, chpettit19 said:

    Many of us explained why Kepler wasn't meeting his. Too many grounders and pop ups. He hit too many balls that were easy outs so it made perfect sense that his BABIP was always low. Just looking at 1 stat (whether an expected stat or something like batting average) is never a good strategy. But people who actually dive into the stats as a whole actually do come up with answers on most player's struggles or successes.

    I agree, this article in general was wildly off target because he looked at 1 stat and didn't do any real digging into Clemens' overall performance. Which is disappointing because I think Matthew is actually one of the best writers on this site. 

    I see league average stats used to say if a payer is good or not. They are worthless for assessing a player’s skill. Look at the sheer number of poor performance by minor league call ups, backup catchers, half of the regular catchers and the player on a contract that the team plays because they feel that they have to and you can see a very large population of players. Sort stats by position for batting until you get that 30 that have played the most.  The median player will be far better than league average 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...