Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    A Former Player’s Perspective on What to Expect out of a Big League Manager:

    The Twins have made a managerial decision and there is a lot of misplaced outrage and vitriol about it. While it may be fun, I would urge the malcontent to adjust their expectations of a manager and re-direct their anger elsewhere.

    Alex Boxwell
    Image courtesy of © Bruce Kluckhohn-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    I have had the good fortune of having what some would call a “playing career” in baseball. I have also had the privilege of playing for some of the best leaders at any level that the game has to offer. From 2015 to 2018, I played for the University of Minnesota. I had the honor of suiting up for John Anderson on some of the most talented clubs the Gophers have run out to date. After college, I had parts of four seasons in independent ball, with my longest tenure being with the Fargo-Moorhead RedHawks. For the RedHawks, former big leaguer and World Series champion Chris Coste was at the helm.

    What were the common threads between these two? They knew how to manage the thermostat of a clubhouse and when to turn the dial one way or the other. They also had a keen understanding of where they could actually impact on-field performance: through strong relationships with their players.

    In college ball, there are many more opportunities to have formal practices and develop skills. While in professional baseball, you are relegated to spring training and early work before one of the 162 games. Not to mention, most major leaguers have already played hundreds of games in the minors and/or college by the time they’ve reached this level. At this level, most guys have a routine and have become extremely polished in their skills. What most guys need is someone who will coach their mentality and their confidence. The margin for being a good big leaguer to someone who might not be playable is so thin that a lot of times it comes down to who can handle going 0-4 with three punch outs.

    For all intents and purposes, Derek Shelton is Rocco Baldelli 2.0; anyone who says otherwise is fooling themselves. Anyone who thinks that, with the current organization's structure, the on-field decisions will change is also fooling themselves. It is very clear in my observations of the Twins that the manager has very little power over what goes on. Everyone says the game is run off of a spreadsheet, and I don’t think that’s too far off here. To me, before each game, there’s a meeting and they decide who is available. After this, a flow chart of “what ifs”. Truthfully, if Rocco had full autonomy during his tenure, I think he would’ve been fired sooner.

    I liked Baldelli, and I like Shelton. I think they both manage personalities well, and players speak highly of them both. The discourse around the managerial position in Minnesota makes me feel like Shelton is going to get considerable innings on the mound this year and maybe take on an Ohtani role while hitting for us, too. The outrage over the hire confuses me. Derek Shelton can’t control whether Royce Lewis, Pablo Lopez, and Byron Buxton are healthy. Derek Shelton will not make us play small ball more often; the front office decides as a whole what the play style will be. He will not convince 30-year-olds with 5,000 at-bats in The Show to choke up with two strikes. At that level, the players are in control of their careers, and if they want to make adjustments, it will be on them.

    What Derek Shelton will do is the only thing he can. He will make a small impact on the day-to-day feel of the clubhouse and manage personalities. People will point to the Brewers and Pat Murphy (I love Murphy), but he proves my point. He had a great pitching staff, managed personalities, and knew when a guy needed to be pushed or needed an “atta boy”. That’s all a manager can do at that level because they will not be physically performing at any point. If the bullpen stinks and they can’t drive in runs, Joe Torre or Dusty Baker would not save them. The manager's job is to put players in a position to succeed (I’d argue the Twins don’t leave much room for this), build a relationship with the players, and know when to throw a bucket of baseballs onto the field.

    I know it’s easy to point the blame at a manager, but I would also argue that’s part of why they are there. A good leader will step in front of the arrows the media fires and deflect praise to his players. I know it’s not a sexy hire, but being a major league manager is not a sexy job.

    Time will also help us understand the hire. If the Twins break this thing down to the studs, he is likely a scapegoat for a 90-100 loss season, and he’s gone in a year, maybe less. If they bring in more talent, it could go the way of Murphy and become a bit of a folk hero. Ultimately, the players' on-field performance will decide his fate.

    The villains in this story are the people who are pulling the strings, and the echoes from 2023 still vibrate through the fan base (rightfully so). Don’t forget who we beat that year. The ones who bore the cross for the organization's poor decisions were Baldelli and our players traded at last year's deadline. Realistically, it should’ve been the decision makers who had to pack their bags, but we can’t always get what we want.

     

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Falvey mentioned it a few times that the performance on the field didn’t match the projections they had to begin the year. I would assume the front office assembles a team and projects the season and it’s up to the manager to reach those projections using the assets you have. This isn’t just in the MLB this is every business from small to enormous. Injuries are a weak excuse because especially in today’s game on average, teams use 14 SP’s during the season (using 2025 data), so if you’re expecting to break camp with 5 guys that will be there the whole season you’re out of your mind. Once you add positional players in the mix, you’ll have completely different teams.
     

    Rocco failed to get the best out of his players for multiple seasons and that’s where I have the problem. Mid-low budget teams rely on development to be competitive and missing on MLB talent consistently you failed at your job. Julian, Lee, Waller, Miranda, and too many others to list. 
     

    In my opinion, now that Falvey has a new manager and he sold off the team to rebuild, this is where he comes to the chopping block. He’s already blamed failure on his managers and players so now he’s the common piece in everything. He selected another manager of his choosing along with trading all of the Twins assets for players of his choosing. If the team fails to build a contender in the next 3 seasons, this is on him and he should be done. 
     

    Im not happy with the owners because they built a new stadium with the promise of spending money on payroll by hiking up taxes. They are clearly not doing this and I don’t like being lied to and better yet paying for someone else’s lies.

    The FO meets with the manager practically every game.  I know they are not talking about their golf games, so the discussion has to be: 1) lineup, 2) bull pen availability, 3) pinch hitting moves late in the game, and 4) matchups based on analytics.  Any big deviation by the manager from the discussions at this meeting would not be looked upon favorably.

    The move that was the most detrimental for the Twins was the signing of Carlos Correa.  While I won't even discuss the disappointment in his contributions to the team, I recognize that the payroll cutback was $30M.  Sound like a familiar number?  The team would have been able to add a mid-level Free Agent each year if they had not gone out and blew the budget on one big purchase.  I'm sure the Pohlad's had to approve the signing, but buyer's remorse must have set in when they realized the effect on the financial position of the business.  Double blame there, Pohlad for saying yes without seeing the future ramifications, Falvey for not recognizing that people smarter than him would touch CC with a 10 foot pole.  The sacrificial lamb was Rocco and they now have sacrificial lamb II unless Pohlad is able to connect the dots and see where the weakest link is (besides himself).

    A couple things:

    @Alex BoxwellWhat are your thoughts about the number of rookies on this team that might still be developing their routine and learning who they are at the MLB level (eg Keashall, Lee maybe, Martin, half the pitching staff after Aug 1)?  Does coaching matter more to them than usual, or do mentor players make a bigger difference?

    Also, even replacing Falvey wouldn't make much difference this year if the parameters of the  budget don't change.  If Pohlads want to lay in some money for the cold winter coming next year there's nothing to do but watch the Twins lose 100 or go to Saints games and see who is going to on the field in 2027.  No manager or GM can win in the current game with a $80-90m payroll. 

    1 hour ago, Cris E said:

    A couple things:

    @Alex BoxwellWhat are your thoughts about the number of rookies on this team that might still be developing their routine and learning who they are at the MLB level (eg Keashall, Lee maybe, Martin, half the pitching staff after Aug 1)?  Does coaching matter more to them than usual, or do mentor players make a bigger difference?

    Also, even replacing Falvey wouldn't make much difference this year if the parameters of the  budget don't change.  If Pohlads want to lay in some money for the cold winter coming next year there's nothing to do but watch the Twins lose 100 or go to Saints games and see who is going to on the field in 2027.  No manager or GM can win in the current game with a $80-90m payroll. 

    I've always thought high school picks and international signs are more subject to what the player development staff has to offer.

    As for the college bats we have, I've always thought they're high floor-low ceiling type prospects. They had an approach that worked at a relatively high level and if that doesn't translate it can be difficult to unlearn habits that brought you so much success. 

    I think other players always will have a bigger impact at that level. Hearing from a veteran who's been through it recently can do wonders for players mental game. A player like Buxton I think is a phenomenal vet to have in the clubhouse since he's been through it all a in his career. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...