I think Hildenberger is a guy that can help at the MLB level as well. Minor league numbers better than Neshek's? As Ob-Wan Kenobi said, "what you say is true, from a certain point of view". Some are, some are not. First, Hildenberger is already a year older than Neshek was when he made his MLB debut. And Neshek stuck. He didn't ride the shuttle back and forth to Rochester once he made it up. In 2006 in AAA, Neshek was used as an "old school" closer. By that I mean he often came into the game in the 8th and a couple times in the 7th, and finished the game - you're going to have to take my word for it, BR doesn't have minor league game logs prior to 2008. But Neshek made 33 appearances in the first half of 2006 (finished 23 of them), and pitched 60 innings. Hildenberger is being used primarily 1 IP at a time. There's nothing wrong with that approach except that I think part of the reason why Neshek was used that way was to accelerate his development. He essentially got a full season's worth of innings at AAA in half a season. Of course, Neshek was more of true sidearmer. I've never seen Hildenberger pitch, but from what I have heard he does sometimes use a "conventional" delivery. Which brings me to my second point. Neshek obliterated AAA. 6 hits per 9, 13 K per 9. Through 10 innings, Hildenberger has allowed 8.4 hits per 9 and "only" 10 K per 9. Obviously far fewer IP than Neshek at the AAA level, so who is to say where his numbers will go. But that brings me to my third point. As I said, Neshek had 60 IP at AAA before getting called up. If that is the standard the Twins use with Hildenberger, he won't be up before September. Frankly that would be true of any of the other guys (Burdi, Melotakis, et al) as well. I don't know that 60 IP at AAA will be the standard used by Falvey. I suspect it will not if the Twins fall out of contention. But if the Twins do stay in contention with the bullpen they have, Falvey would be quite justified in saying "Why change it?"