March/April is one of his worst months. He has a career 5.76 ERA and a career .816 opponent's OPS. However, his actual worst month is August (5.91, .853) , so that kinda shoots that theory to pieces As for the notion that he might be better as a reliever, some have suggested it, his worst inning is the first inning (.810 OPS) other than the 9th, in which he has pitched just once in his career. Also, the second time he faces hitters in a game his OPS is .827. That sounds like it might support an argument for the pen. But then you look at the first time through and it is .719. That's still not very good. To me it comes down to him simply being unable to execute the pitches he needs to make. He KNOWS he has to keep the ball down to have any chance. He just. can't. do it. Not consistently anyway. I'm looking back at his game log from 2015 because it is undeniable that he was consistently terrible in 2016. He had a smattering of good starts, but by and large 2016 was a disaster for him. He was pretty bad in the second half of 2015. From July 21 to the end of the year, Gibson made 14 starts. He failed to complete 6 innings in half of them. He gave up 5 earned runs or more in 5 of them. His ERA coming into July 21 was an excellent 2.85. By the end of the season it was 3.84, up a full run. So, my Minnesota High School Math skills are saying that's 9 1/2 months of largely terrible pitching by Gibson covering more than 40 starts. How much more do his defenders need to see before they are ready to cut bait? The definition of insanity is doing something over and over again and expecting a different result. Allowing Gibson to continue to start and expecting him to do well is therefore insane.