Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

wsnydes

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,884

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by wsnydes

  1. wsnydes
    How much longer are we going to keep saying that? I know that I've been saying it for at least a year, so I'm sure that there are others that have been for longer. It's almost like a running gag anymore.
  2. wsnydes
    I'm not sure we've been watching the same player.
  3. wsnydes
    This is kind of why I'm holding a full opinion until I see what they're planning. If the idea is to give Vargas every chance to show what he's got and not have the older Park get in the way, then I'm fine with the move. If the idea is to sign someone else to block Vargas, then I don't get it at all.
  4. wsnydes
    I'll wait until I see what they do, if anything, regarding the DH but I fear that you are correct. Not a fan if that will be the case.
  5. wsnydes
    That appears to be the case. Park was DFA'd to make room for Belisle.
  6. wsnydes
    I think this is one good thing that comes out of not dealing Dozier. That's one extra slot that can be used to evaluate the arms that are already here. I'd have preferred a deal to be made, but it's not all bad that one wasn't.
  7. wsnydes
    I agree completely that this team needs to draft and develop better, but if they can do something with the talent that is already in the organization that can maybe make it better, why is that a bad thing? Perhaps a diamond in the rough emerges. Perhaps this helps the better pitching talent in the organization take another step up. You have to start somewhere. Even if they hit on the their draft picks, there is still that wait for them to get to the big leagues. They may as well try to improve the talent that will emerge in the time between now and then as best they can.
  8. wsnydes
    This pleases me.
  9. wsnydes
    Agree completely. It's far too early to be making any broad judgments in any direction. Even without much activity this offseason so far, I want to see how they operate during the season as well. As you pointed out, that timeframe is more important than the offseason. Since this FO hasn't navigated a season yet, there is still much to learn about them.
  10. wsnydes
    While I agree with this completely, what is done/not done from April-September is often set up by what they do/do not do from November-January. I agree that a little patience is needed for the new FO, but that doesn't mean that we can't be a little disappointed by the inactivity either.
  11. wsnydes
    Thanks for the shameless plug, Ben. I was actually talking with a friend about the catching position and how it seems to be evolving just the other day. Being also a Cardinals fan, my immediate thoughts were that guys like Molina are a rarer and rarer breed by the day it seems. I thought a few years ago that I may be old fashioned in this view, but I'd take a good defensive catcher that knows how to control a game over one that puts up monster numbers offensively any day. I believe that good catchers can take pressure off of many aspects of the game that really can't be done by other positions. That may not be the case in this day. Thanks for the link.
  12. wsnydes
    I like how you put this Mike. I expected a Dozier trade to give a bump to the rotation and clear a logjam at 2B. Regardless of how wise it was to walk away, it didn't happen. That is disappointing. They got a catcher. Not disappointing! Sign a FA or two for the bullpen. Hasn't happened yet. Disappointed so far. I'm also disappointed that Molitor is still around. That's pretty much all that I was expecting this offseason. So you can see why I'm disappointed.
  13. wsnydes
    There are people that aren't going to be happy regardless of what the Twins do. I'm not asking for the team to be rebuilt in one offseason, particularly this one. I'm asking for them to at least start down that road. They don't need to travel the full length of that road, just start down it. The four moves the 2013 Cubs made were at least marginal improvements and efforts to improve the club. That's more than what this team has done thus far. All that I really expected this offseason was one trade and two or three other FA acquisitions to the big league club. I don't feel that's being overly ambitious. Those are fairly low expectations of a 103 loss club in my view.
  14. wsnydes
    I don't think anyone is clamoring for a "whole bunch of moves". To date, they've made one meaningful addition to the major league roster. The bullpen remains untouched and the two trade pieces they do have remain on the roster. I'm not suggesting they make deals for the sake of making deals, but there have been moves to be made that have not in FA. I suspect some bullpen arms will be brought in eventually, but even from someone not expecting much, this offseason has been disappointing. Status quo is not something a 103 loss team should be doing even if they believe that they will have improvement from within. I don't think it unreasonable to expect more than one move to bolster the emerging talent that is on this team.
  15. wsnydes
    They've also signed Koji Uehara and traded for Davis to bolster the bullpen. They've signed Brett Anderson to compete for their rotation (if he can stay on the field). They've added plenty of organizational depth as well. That's more than the Twins have done. I'm not trying to compare the Cubs to the Twins, I'm simply trying to point out that the team that won the World Series isn't standing pat, so why is a team that finished on the complete opposite end of the spectrum doing so? Its meant as a general statement, nothing else. Even for those of us that have some patience, that's a pretty tough sell.
  16. wsnydes
    This. The Cubs, winners of 103 games and a World Series have been far more active in improving their roster than the Twins, losers of 103 games and the #1 draft pick have. I realize the Cubs have lost some players, but they've worked to replace them. I'm not suggesting that this will be a quick turnaround, but that's about 180 degrees the opposite of what should be expected. They have far less to do to maintain an elite winning team than what needs to be done to get the Twins just back to respectability let alone a winner.
  17. wsnydes
    I don't want to say "anyone but Molitor", but I agree that the writing is kind of on the wall for this. It would be a logical move in my view as well. Also, I'm really glad to hear that May is slated to start. I think he's better suited for that role.
  18. wsnydes
    My only regret is that I have but one "like" to give.
  19. wsnydes
    Agreed. There's no reason not to trade from organizational positions of depth to fill holes. The only thing I worry about is that you start relying on fewer and fewer of those guys panning out. With a sketchy track record of hitters coming up and struggling to adjust to MLB hitting, that's a concern. That being said, you can't be paralyzed as an organization like that. The pitching has to be improved somehow and it isn't going to all come from within. Trading some of those pieces becomes one of those means.
  20. wsnydes
    Fascinating stuff as always, Parker. Thanks for this! It really is incredible how much information is out there and how beneficial some guys find it and how detrimental others find it.
  21. wsnydes
    Your drunken decision making doesn't appear to be as poor as mine can be. Last time my wife and I had happy hour at home I ended up buying a $90 Hootie and the Blowfish record on Amazon. So I think you'll be okay finding that third vote, and perhaps a few more. I, on the other hand...
  22. wsnydes
    Discounts may come in handy for this coming season. Unfortunately for Mike, that wouldn't be very profitable for him.
  23. wsnydes
    Cool! Good luck. Hopefully it all pays off for you in the end!
  24. wsnydes
    You spent it all on Tootsie Rolls and Twinkies, didn't you?
  25. wsnydes
    Thanks for the reply. What I take from your response is that my initial take was correct in that the main difference is probably the aggressiveness with it. I think we each touched on similar if not the same points with the farm system talent and development and some of the free agent signings. I simply feel that they could have done more sooner with the little they did have. I agree completely on the FA bit. There's no reason to spend money on a FA when you aren't ready to win. It's wasting the money and the talent you just bought. Plus, you may have someone emerge to fill that void unexpectedly and can focus on other areas of concern with the money.
×
×
  • Create New...