Given your criteria, you’ve already given points to some parks over others. For me, my criteria, first and foremost, and really everything, is in-game experience. How are the sightlines, how is accessibility, how is comfort (both from weather and seats standpoint), amenities, the home-town fans and over all cost of everything. History would play no part in my rankings because that would give some places an advantage over others and really bear no weight for me except for the first time I visit in a ‘Wow, this is cool. I’m at (fill in the blank)’ sort of way. Given that, Wrigley is toward the bottom of my list for just about every one of those reasons except history. And, frankly, I much prefer going to Guaranteed Rate over Wrigley. It’s not a great ballpark and wouldn’t be high on my list, depending on where I was sitting, but other than historical significance, it ranks higher for me in every other category. There is much more to do near Wrigley with all the restaurants and bars packed into the area, and that can be a factor. If you want to go somewhere after the game, yeah, I guess I’d rather be at Wrigley for that convenience. But because of the density of people and establishments, the crime rate around Wrigley is actually higher than the crime rate around Guaranteed Rate.