First off, that's a fine rant right there, Dean. I love me a good rant. Now, here are my thoughts: Agree largely on the knee jerk reactions based on small sample sizes. Where I'll clarify on Buxton is this: To say he has been anything other than a flop at the major league level to this point is pretty much off-base. 'To this point' being the key to that phrase. Buxton has 187 plate appearances over the last two seasons. That's about 1/4 of a full season. There's that snap-judgment thing. He deserves wayyy more time than that before I write him off as a 'bust.' Now am I concerned he may end up being a bust? Frankly, I am, though just a bit. Roy Smalley, whose judgment I trust, has said that he doesn't like Buxton's swing, that it's too long and has too many holes in it. To me, that's a good thing. At least we have a theory on what's up with Buck striking out so ******* much. Now that he's been sent to Rottenchester he can work on shortening his stroke and buttoning up the holes in it. He already plays Gold Glove-caliber defense. Let's give him time to get his swing up to ML standards. Hitting is difficult, people. I'm not sure how many really realize that. I also don't think most people have any idea how much time & preparation great hitters put into their craft. Buxton may turn out to be a flop, but we're a long, long ways from objectively declaring that. I want him to excel right now as much as anyone. But it's not that simple. Completely agree on the talented writing staff here at Twins Daily. We may not always agree with everything they say or all of their opinions (that's the beauty of America & baseball!), but these guys know their stuff and have proven repeatedly over a long period of time that they deserve to be respected. They've absolutely earned it. As for dissenting commenters here in the Twins Daily Forums, I'd encourage you to be thankful for the lively community that y'all have built and continue to grow here. Baseball's a great sport to debate over. It probably lends itself to back-and-forth exchanges as much, if not more, than any other sport. Be thankful for all the commenters that come here and give you something to chew on. After that, it's on you whether you choose to pile any more of what they're serving on your plate. Commenters that are, shall we say, off-base or misguided- provide a valuable service in that they can make the peeps that know their stuff look that much smarter. "If there were no villains, we'd have no heroes." Or something like that. Anyways, the guys that put this site together and contribute all the great content on here should be uber-proud of it. And the many regular commenters that are here deserve credit for keeping the ball moving downfield. If everyone agree on everything all the time, what would we have to pee & moan about?