Let me start by saying the odds of this happening are close 0.000001%. But were in the off season now and sometimes thoughts like this pop into my head and I wonder if others think about them or if they don't if they think my thoughts are straight up crazy or would actually make sense in world in which people are logical thinkers with no emotional attachments to, people, places, events, things, etc. So here we go: Joe Mauer has 3 years remaining on his contract at $23M per year or $69M remaining. Let's say Joe continues the trend he has been on for the last two seasons and performs worse than last year. If Joe's line next year is along the lines of .255/.320/.360 (.680 OPS) do the Twins offer him a deal to leave the organization? If the Twins are playoff contenders again next year and actually take that next step in spite of Mauer, it might make sense to cut him and make room for a better, younger, cheaper option at first base. I know baseball contracts are guaranteed so if he is cut he still gets paid. However, deals can be made to make things better. Sometimes it benefits both sides, sometimes not. Here is where I get to who says no first: Lets say the Twins and Joe's agent discuss him leaving the team after 2016 season with $46M remaining on his contract. If the Twins said they would pay him $11.5M each of the remaining two years and defer the final $23M for 8 years at which time they will pay him out in installments over a 10 year period + 2% interest on money earned over the 8 year annuity period. Once payments start interest earning stops (this is most likely too simple but am using it for this hypothetical). So the interest earned would be $3.95M we'll round up to $4.0M. So beginning in 2027 the Twins would begin paying out Joe's annual installment payment of $2.7 million dollars through 2038. Assuming Joe signs with another club in 2017 this may make sense for him as an overall investment depending on what he receives. For the Twins they only spend an additional $4 million dollars spread out over 18 years. So who says no first - My guess is Mauer would, or would counter with a Bobby Bonilla sized settlement.