I get so sick of these discussions because BPA is incredibly subjective. Buxton was not universally considered BPA. Some looked at Appel, some Gausman, and apparently some thought it was Correa. It's one thing if everyone says "that guy is BPA" like Strasburg was a few years back, but beyond that, this argument gets really silly, as no one can even agree on what they value (such as pitchers being more valuable than hitters, etc) much less who is the best overall player. This is where need comes in. In this draft, there are 3 BPAs, that from what I can tell could fall in any order (I should note that I tend to think that Stewart is clearly alone as the #4 guy as well, so picking him at 4 satisfies both need and BPA). As much as I wouldn't be a fan of it, if Bryant fell, I think the Twins have to take him if Appel/Gray are off the board. But once clear BPAs are gone, need should become a major factor in the decision making process. This is what disappointed me in last year's draft. Buxton was not clearly the BPA. There was no clear BPA. Had the Twins taken Appel, we'd be looking at a top 10 overall pitching prospect likely destroying AA/AAA right now, and we need that far more than we need Buxton.