Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Platoon

Verified Member
  • Posts

    5,830
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Platoon

  1. This. Offense feasts against average pitching. You don't get those chances in 5 or 7 games series as often. You may roll into Houston or New York and miss a one or two level starter in the regular season. That won't happen in October. The pitching match ups will often be head to head. In tight playoff baseball, offense is the least important arrow in you quiver.
  2. There is only one question remaining this season: MN Twins. Great team? Or Greatest team ever?
  3. Maybe we are confusing catching and hitting. Garver could always hit, it's whats kept him in the game. He is still a sub standard receiver, blocking the low ball is still a mystery to him. The good news that no one steals anymore, so throw out rates are passe.
  4. I keep getting confused. Those of us in the back of the room have been wondering for a long time what working the count does for a hitter? One passes on a dead red FB, to swing at a 2-2 slider off the plate? "In every AB you are going to get one pitch to hit, you better hit it" has been around for a long time. There's a reason for that. There's also a reason for pitchers wanting to get ahead in the count, hitters averages drop dramatically late in a negative count. Pitchers and hitters work at diametric opposites. What's good for one is bad for the other. And both adjust to realities. If Twins hitters continue to "ambush" early fastballs they will likely get the Dozier treatment. Early off speed stuff in the zone. It's a constant battle. As for the GB rate? That's pretty hard to maintain in this HR, SO, high pitches in the zone style of play we see today. The constant shifts and emphasis on launch angles somewhat precludes the ground ball.
  5. The Twins are running on all cylinders right now, and seem to be unstoppable. The SP is above reasonable expectations, the core relievers are at least acceptable, and the hitters are producing. And Sano waits in the wings, or Florida? Hopefully the FO will not rest on its laurels and keep tweaking. If I have a concern it's regression. For this ride to continue there would have to be some other worldly numbers put up. At a fifth of the schedule, this means Rosario with 60 HR's? Garver hitting mid .300's with 35 HR's? Buxton with 70 doubles might have a chance. There is definitely room for Cruz to up his game though Polanco seems the most likely to be able to hold his current level with the stick. I do think the Twins win the division, but 92 games is quite a few. Clevleand just plain has suffered too many lost players to be a threat.
  6. So when La Tortugas returns someone leaves? Cave? Andrianza? Then Sano returns? Someone leaves? Cave? Andrainza? (Sp) I can see Cave leaving, but I can't see them letting their backup SS go, unless they truly believe Marwin can play SS for a day. I can't believe they go down to 12 pitchers. What I fear but don't want is that Astudillo ends up the odd man out. I think it will come down to the choice between two utility players, Marwin and The Turtle. If that's the case, this FO will not dump their off season signee.
  7. In order of preference, I follow a game on 1) TiVo. 2) live tv. 3) Radio. Sunday was my first extended radio listening of the year. So glad to see Dan Gladden has not lost it. From his exuberant "got him" on a 3-1 pitch, to his declaring Tauchman "overmatched" in the beginning of his home run AB, he quickly reminded me of why when I listen to the Twins on radio I take CCO's advice and "turn down the sound"
  8. The most impactful story I saw here this week was the one Chief passed along about pitcher Rich Hill and his family. It's a stark reminder that players are people, not just a bunch of statistics in a uniform. That's not always easy to remember. As for "baseball" itself, I like Toms game write ups and Ted's posts on team topics. One other thought. GT are back, and the numbers seem decent. But I miss the old GT's. The ones where if you commented on the game, or used math, you were soundly castigated! For those who didn't attend in that long bygone era, there were some extremely intelligent and very humorous comments made pertaining to almost anything. Except baseball.
  9. I sort of thought the umpires lost interest when neither team could catch a fly ball, field a ground ball, block a ball in the dirt, throw a ball 60' to 1B or decided to run into an out at the plate by 15'. Or maybe they fell asleep during the 16 consecutive outs the Twins made. While the umpires didn't have a good game, nothing they could have done would have changed the outcome. The teams made sure of that.
  10. I guess my concern of several years ago is answered. What happens to GT if the Twins ever field a decent baseball team, and the posters start talking about baseball. GT's now are like watching sports with my son in law. Which I no longer do.
  11. Thanks for passing this along, Chief. When I was a teenager, I was a pallbearer for a very young child's funeral. Often when I read something like this I think of that day. I don't ever want to see that kind of grief again. Ever! I can't conceive of what it would be like to go through it oneself.
  12. I am not sure if good pitching beats good hitting. But the SSS since the turn of the twentieth century indicates it's trending in that direction!
  13. If Glunn turns you down you can stay here. Of course I am assuming you have an as yet WS that is not spoken for?
  14. A few years ago during the offseason the Twins were dangling Dozier to the Dodgers, I commented that I would let Dozier go for less than others thought. My rationale was that the Twins should move Polanco to second and find a "glove" to play SS until Lewis or Javier is ready. I opined that Polanco would turn into a much better hitter than Dozier. It wasn't one of the most popular post I ever made. But Polanco just always seemed like hitting wasn't really a problem, that you just do it. A very calm approach. And while he probably won't hit 40 HR's like BD did, he also won't spend 162 games trying to do so!
  15. I doubt that. Falvine signed Gonsalves as his super utility player to have Rocco sit him and play his 3rd? string catcher ahead of him this early in the season. Not that I would object, but don't think for a minute that Rocco is in total command of the lineup. That form of front office/dugout collaboration seems to be becoming more prevelant as baseball "evolves".
  16. Neither could Falvey I am sure. But the guy writing the checks didn't seem concerned. .
  17. A couple general thoughts. First of which is Buxton is not your typical 9 hole hitter. He is there, and rightfully so to correct the mistakes made when he came out of ST and was stuck in the 3 hole. To say he didn't respond well is an understatement. I won't argue with the "lineup order means nothing crowd", but I will argue that the number on the spot that a batter hits in, matters to that player. It causes expectations. For example, we didn't sign Cruz to hit leadoff or 9. Why? Becasue middle of the order hitters are "expected" to provide power and production. Cruz knows this, Buxton would assume this, and Dozier would have struggled to attain this. I likely wouldn't have agreed with Molitor on what day of the week Easter Sunday was on, but I did agree with his sticking with Dozier leading off. BD was an ambush fastball hitter. You don't see many of those in high leverage situations, you see double play low breaking stuff often, nothing to lift. As for Buxton, leave him be. Let his confidence and pitch selection mature. There is lots of time to move him. This lineup will have plenty dry days to do that. One last thought. IMHO, trying to move hot and cold guys around in an order in a long season is sort of like buying stocks when they are high, and selling them when they are going down. Your always chasing your tail. If a player has a history of producing, and there is no external rationale, then to quote an old saw, "dance with the one who brung you"!
  18. I can easily wait til the Twins play crappy division play day after day...... Nothing is less exciting than watching a 16-3 baseball game against what appears to be a AA team. Yawn!
  19. I had no idea Game of Thrones was still on? I quit watching when they cut off Ned Starks head. Oh well. I sort of lost interest in Sci Fi Super Heroes once I noticed that Superman looked an awful lot like Clark Kent did. The glasses confused me for awhile, but once I got HD tv, I saw through the ruse.
  20. I saw some time ago in the (not so) Free Press that the Chief was updated and his voice box repaired. Posters may now fill in their personal comments on another Chief, but please be kind! Oh, you said Chef? Never mind!
  21. Such is the life of a HR offense. My question: if you win a 10-2 game and lose two games 4-2 and 4-3 you are averaging 5 runs per game, and are 1-2. The inconsistency of the HR offense is my problem, not the amount of runs scored. Runs prevented are likely more important, and easily more consistent.Someone above mentioned the Rangers of yore. Seems this team could be a doppelgänger!
  22. Been called a lot of things when I umped, but never a lawyer! That's an automatic thumb, just like the F word!
  23. Your take on AI is spot on. Two years ago out of nowhere my libertarian, conservative, pull your self up by the bootstraps son in law, out of nowhere, opined "what are we going to do with all the people without jobs"? How will they be able to live? I know it's a discussion for another day, but it's coming. As for balls and strikes, you're not wrong or right. But neither am I, it's simply personal preference. Possibly age and baseball background associated.
  24. I agree with this, and I happen to like broccoli. As for an inch off the plate. If it's clears the plate by an inch and the Robo ump calls it a strike, or vice versa I imagine, that's not worth the change to the games history at all. As for recognizing balls and strikes by hitters, a good umpire once told me any hitter who can tell you if a ball missed or caught the outside corner is lying. Frankly I tend to believe that theory I know when you ump, and sit on the inside corner, which is very common, the outside corner isnt as clear. Is that an argument for robo? Not if Robo has an inch to play with.
×
×
  • Create New...