DH: Yes. A thousand times, yes. 3 batter minimum: No. A thousand times no. Let the more advantageous strategy dictate moves, not some arbitrary rule. If having pitchers pitch to one hitter proves to be good strategy, so be it. If the "LOOGY" proves over time to be poor strategically, in that it is too damaging to the rest of the pitching staff, and too limiting to the bench, it'll go away on it's own. Time Clock: Yes. And enforce it ruthlessly. 28 Man Sept Roster: Yes. This seems like a lot more reasonable adaptation than the current "anyone on the 40 man" farce. 26 Man roster vs current 25: No. Reluctanly. On the surface, it sounds like a good idea. But I fear the primary effect will be to benefit the big money teams. They'll be spending millions on the best available option for the 26th man. The Twins (and others) will just take the MLB minimum out of the 25 man roster and use it to fund the 26th man. The Yankees will get Andrew McCutcheon. The Twins will get someone who would be in Rochester.