Did Rocco remove last night's starter based on a predetermined criteria or not?
Did he decide, well before a pitch was thrown, that "third time through" was THE deciding factor, or didn't he?
I think thats a pretty clear yes. Not effectiveness. Not fatigue. Not even pitches, or innings.
Just a set criteria.
If you're good with that, fine. Defend it. But the post above is just an ad hoc attack on anyone who dares have a difference of opinion on the manager. It has zero to do with the actual circumstances of last night's game, or for that matter the manager's actual performance, short or long term.
For the record, nobody claimed "things would've ended up great." They scored one run. That's a problem, long and short term. What suggestions do you have to fix that?
That doesn't mean we can't discuss things that are ongoing managerial weaknesses