I don't think it is clear that Hicks has shown more than Rosario in the minors. Rosario progresssed through at a slighly younger age and put up slightly bettter numbers overall. He also made the PR team in the WBC as a 21 year old. Rosario Age 20 Low A - .835 OPS Age 21 - .903 OPS at high A, .734 at AA Age 22 - .672 OPS at AA in 79 games, missed 50 to start the year Total Minors - .829 OPS, 106 2B, 26 3B, 26 HR in 427 games. Hicks Age 20 - .829 OPS in low A Age 21 - .722 OPS in high A Age 22 - .844 OPS in AA Total Minors .798 OPS, 124 2B, 32 3B, 39 HR in 567 games. You can make a case for both, it is pretty close IMO. I think people forget that everyone was saying the same things about Hicks prior to his age 22 season. Lots of tools, relatively underperforming them. Not putting it together, etc. Then he has one good year (not a phenomenal year) and then makes the big league club the next year and we are all saying the same thing about him.