Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. I don't know, if EVERY relief pitcher is not good this year....it is pretty easy to predict what will happen.
  2. Except I'm not talking about the whole season....If he's not good because of the start....is he good because they got better and did what expected the rest of the way? I mean, they "clearly" did something to fix the issues if they go 10 games over .500 over 113 games....so he fixed things....but he is still bad because of the start? What, exactly, could he do REALISTICALLY given your success criteria to keep his job? Because it seems people are arguing the outcome is not ok....now we are saying the outcome can be good, but the process can be bad, so he's still canned?
  3. If the Twins go 10 games over .500 the rest of the year....does that mean he is doing things right?
  4. 6-8 weeks maybe....isn't major? Gah, too bad, I wish him luck in his recovery!
  5. Or, maybe, the players just aren't good fielders....and the FO cares more about their other traits? Or, maybe, they have been unlucky. People have a tendency to simplify, and look for a reason something(s) happens...when sometimes there isn't a reason. Sometimes things just happen. Not aimed at you...but this idea that people aren't being held accountable, we have no idea. Also, I'm not sure that anyone should be "held accountable" after this few games.
  6. That's very different than fire them......that said, I share your concern....but many here just think they SUCK because the team has been dreadful this year. It is more complex than that..... For example, does the Tigers' record mean that it is the coaching, or maybe it is the players? Or both?
  7. This is a year they expected to compete for a championship, supposedly, and they brought in Happ and Shoemaker....so I'm not sure they are every going to "spend what it takes". Pitching is the number 1 issue with this team, and it isn't close. The hitters will eventually hit....but other than Berrios and Maeda pitching better, no one on the MLB roster has much upside more than they are showing. No one. edit: ok, Alcala and possibly duffey...possibly.
  8. And yet, other teams are promoting pitchers that are effective.....When do we finally get to start judging them? I've said at the end of this year.....Also, don't they have any responsibility to develop the players that were already in the system?
  9. So, he just forgot how to do his job this year? After two successful years?
  10. They haven't been? They won the division two years in a row. The circumstances might have been odd, but they can only play the games put in front of them. This year is bad, sure, but to say they haven't done their job as the core so far seems like a stretch to me.
  11. You looked at international drafts, but not the data about the likelihood of early draft picks being good compared to late picks?
  12. People are really struggling with context of stats this year for sure....which is understandable, given what is happening. But it makes conversation here less than ideal much of the time.
  13. I want DeGrom regardless of the individual win stat in a team game.....I think that's the point here. But, man, it would be great if that wasn't what this thread was about....
  14. He's more likely to succeed there than as a starter, IMO.
  15. I asked a Fangraphs writer (and former front office member) a question.... mike sixel 1:23 At what point should the Twins start calling up minor league pitchers to get them experience for next year? Or, is that over rated? Kevin Goldstein 1:24 That is NOT overrated, but I don't think they should start thinking about that kind of thing until after the AS break.
  16. The previous post said they should consider calling up the Cuban because he was 27.... Seems that logic applies to a 26 year old whose upside is back end starter.... No place did I imply it was a negative he had not debuted yet.... As teams have learned, most pitchers don't throw harder in their late twenties, most being the key word.... If his upside is back end starter, and he's 26, maybe he should be a relief pitcher, so he can go more all out.
  17. Sounds like a bullpen arm to me.... Given the other starters and his age.....
  18. Jax is 26.......shouldn't he be up soon too?
  19. Jax will be 27 by then.....how long does anyone think he'll be good? I'll believe they might have a successful pipeline when they have even 1 guy be a good SP for at least a year. As I've said, they deserve until the end of this year to be judged as a FO.....so we'll start seeing this year, I guess, how I feel.
  20. That loaded twenty tweets..... Rethink?
  21. Should teams be allowed to just walk off and end the game? Move on with life?
  22. How about 280 with the smallest amount of power? or to field well?
  23. The Rays are the least foolish team in sports when it comes to evaluation and trades. Cheap ? Yes. Foolish? No.
  24. Do you think they'll sign Berrios AND another high priced starter? This year they signed Happ and Shoemaker......two number 5 types, in a year they were supposed to compete. I'd love it if they did, but I have strong doubts.
  25. I have no idea how people think Donaldson is "serviceable" or bad or whatever.....he's a top 10 3B this year. Is he everything we all hoped right now? No. No he is not. But he's still well above average.
×
×
  • Create New...