I think this: 1. Whether they explicitly said it or not, asking for a new stadium "to remain competitive" implies they will spend more on payroll. 2. MLB salaries are going up faster than inflation, so just spending some more is not really, IMO, keeping up with their promise. 3. NO ONE expects them to compete solely on FA, or to have a payroll like the Dodgers (that is all strawman BS). 4. St. Peter really doesn't get PR. Blaming the fans for the awful attendance and payroll is just plain stupid. Reminiscent of saying we shouldn't worry about the last 2-3 men on the roster (when, you know, you only get 25). 5. I get how payroll can ebb and flow, but Gleeman is right about how this fan feels. It stinks for the owners to pocket profits one year, and not see the payroll go up in following years. Maybe if this team is ever good again, we'll see a change, but we'll never know and will have to take their word for it. Who here is really going to believe them? 6. I think that this ownership cares more about making a certain amount of money, than about winning. I don't know this, I think it based on years of observation. But there are clearly owners that appear more willing to spend money to increase the likelihood of winning (note, another straw man alert, no one is saying payroll guarantees winning).