Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. I think teams should be free to use their players any way they want. I am not in favor of this at all, but wouldn't be upset if it happened.
  2. Well, looking at the picks and comparing the WAR generated does just that. It compares their outcomes achieved to other teams. And, they don't fare well. Those arguing that the time frame should include the last 3 drafts.....go for it. I bet the actual MLB outcomes produced look no better for the Twins. There can be all kinds of explanations or excuses, but the outcomes are the outcomes. If they are so awesome at getting in talent, whey are 4 of 5 starting pitchers on next year's roster from outside the organization? If they are so good at getting talent, why do they have 4 straight years of 90+ losses (so far)? I don't get why people get so defensive about this. They are terrible. They have been terrible for at least 4 years. That is driven by an insufficient number of good players. Why is that hard to acknowledge?
  3. A point where people seem to disagree is that the Twins should expect to do poorly drafting so late.....vs some who say that is not an acceptable expectation..... It is hard to know if it is all drafting, all development, or what percent of each. It is hard to know how they really make decisions. All we can really know is the outcomes vs other teams......
  4. Chicago is better than median, best they've been ranked in all the years KLAW has been doing this. CLE and KC are not all that good...... He doesn't go into all the players, that will come later, this is just a paragraph on each team in general.
  5. If your strategy is to be median salary, and to rely on your farm, you NEED to be BETTER than others at it, or you will be bad. It isn't enough to be "as good as" expected. It doesn't work with your strategy. Lots of excuses, but the truth is, they missed a lot for several years in a row. Those are the outcomes produced....and that's why they are bad.
  6. I don't think Sano would be ahead of Bryant even if healthy, Seth. Everyone is in love with Bryant.
  7. Sounds about right to me.
  8. But it is part of the "run prevention" disease. Both pitching and defense contribute.....
  9. how does that happen if it is limited? If we go back to the old way, most stars didn't come here, because we got crappy interleague teams...... That's my point, you want the stars, every one of them, to visit as many stadiums as possible. Limiting interleague does NOT do that. to the point that interleague games should be "special", why? No other US sport does that*. *the NFL has to, because it only has 16 games, but even there, I am guaranteed to see me team play every team at least every 4 years ON FREE TV or in person.
  10. I'm curious how they have used his connections, then. Because in 50 years, it has led to zero signings. What conclusion should I reach about those connections?
  11. Just because the pitching was bad, does not mean fixing the defense is not also a good idea. Some seem to be implying that. It is possible to fix both. The delta between ERA and FIP is meaningful, even if the Twins imply* it is not. The fact that it continues, year after year, should concern people that want a winner, imo. *At least I think Ryan has been implying that, that is not about the defense, it is ONLY about the pitching, but I might be parsing his statements (and actions) incorrectly.
  12. they have not signed one Cuban player in the last five years........have they? So, either they don't want to, or have somehow failed every time. I don't think of them as consistent failures, therefore I conclude they don't want to. I could be wrong, it is conceivable that they have failed every single time to achieve their goal. But, I really don't want to think that of them. I prefer to conclude that they just have not really wanted to sign Cuban players. That seems like a much nicer conclusion to me.
  13. I was not trying to be cold, if it came off that way, apologies. I just don't know what other conclusion to reach, given the outcomes.
  14. Ban interleague play? So the vast majority of fans can't see players in other leagues in person? I have no idea how that is a good idea.
  15. I agree, this could be a good move for him. good luck to him.
  16. Well, given the number of Cubans you've signed in the last 5 or so years, since the new revenue streams......the only conclusion I can draw from your question is that he's telling you they all are not worth the money.....which has clearly NOT been true. are you suggesting you are somehow using them?
  17. What's snarky about that? there are three terrible at bats by pitchers, then they sub 1 or 2 times, and they sub with generally bad hitters. Are those not facts? For me, nothing about that is exciting, not one bit.
  18. I'm not sure most of them get that much money, btw......
  19. It is a PED, no doubt about that. Athletes take Aderall to enhance performance.
  20. These aren't board games.....simple sets of rules, so it is about the athletes, not about the rules.
  21. Even if Pelfrey is good for 15 starts, ya, right, what could you trade him for? MOVE ON ALREADY.
  22. Three awful at bats by a pitcher, followed by a pinch hitter in inning 7, then maybe another one in inning 8 or nine. And, those pinch hitters aren't very good hitters. In the mean time, you had to watch a pitcher "hit" three times. Ooooh, the excitement!
  23. Pelfrey. Sigh. He's gone after this year, why keep investing time, resources, playing time, anything in this guy? Move on to the future. Very, very potentially frustrating.
  24. Correct. One set of rules for the sport. And, it should be the rules about entertainment, not about sticking to the past, imo. There is no NL "strategy".....99% of the time the managers make the same decision over and over. There is rarely any "strategy". And, the vast majority of non-fans could not care less about managers, they want to watch great hitters and pitchers face each other.
×
×
  • Create New...