Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. I don't think it is wrong for great players to want to play together. What is wrong with that? You seen to have concluded that is wrong, but why? Isn't that their right, to want to win? So, i don't even agree with your starting premise.
  2. Agreed, but things change when you are in the majors.....so while scouting helps, it isn't fully predictive. Either way, he's the backup this year and we'll know a lot more in 6 months than we do now.
  3. We won't really know much about Garver's defense for a couple of years, unless it is truly atrocious. But in general, unless you have an elite hitter back there, I agree.
  4. Terrible human beings.
  5. I say start the best player, in the best context. Garver can flat out hit minor league pitching. Let's give him a real shot this year.
  6. Awful. I hope he sues the **** our of the government. And wins.
  7. How does this do that? Because... A. They still talk B. Even if they don't directly, this doesn't stop anything about trying to get the best players together. Imo
  8. Effectively signed for seven years... Guess long term deals still exist for the top players
  9. Wowzers.
  10. Which prospects are they protecting? Not opposed, just seems like other positions are bigger needs. That said, if they like him a lot, great.
  11. Three options? Hmmmm, makes a bit more sense.
  12. Not sure I understand. They have this player twice already in AAA. Not sure it matters, but I don't get it.
  13. Sheldon Richardson.... Wow
  14. Not even close. Suarez is not considered an elite player, and did not receive the kind of bonus those two did. Imo
  15. See the new version of that post.... Which is highly redacted and edited
  16. There is, imo, a difference between wanting something, and expecting something.
  17. Yes to all of that. Well, except reading the minds of other players. But yes, scoops and stretches are in there. If we all watched every game, we'd see how infrequently stretches happen, and how most first basemen make the plays most every time. At least that's what I've read on line, I've certainly not watched every game. This is not to disparage Mauer, he is definitely very good on defense. It's just that the gap is much smaller than we think between good and bad defense at first. Mauer is a good player, the question is how long that will last, and what it costs to pay him, and have a roster spot, compared to other options.
  18. Great post. This is also largely due to the fact that attendance plays little part in profits now....
  19. You know, I mostly agreed with your first post....I didn't say anything that you didn't seem to at least imply.
  20. Actually, ranking correlates fairly well with outcomes. Not great, but they aren't really guesses without merit.
  21. It's almost like defensive stats aren't out there to look at.... He's very good, but the delta on runs saved for first basemen is tiny compared to other positions. Tiny.
  22. I would have to read this again to be sure, bit I agree with all of this on first read.
  23. Need a CB more than safety, but my priorities were.... QB DL OG CB DL S OT Rumor has it they are moving Remmers inside, making OT a top priority.
  24. He even said he might have Gonsalves too high..... Both Gore and Greene are ahead of Lewis. It is a system lacking star power. If they missed on both Stewart and Gordon..... That is an opportunity lost.
×
×
  • Create New...