And I prefer to look for the truth, whatever that may be. I don't decide who is better and then cherry-pick stats. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. In our discussion, you preferred not to value RE24 based on a few examples, but instead said that those who SAW the Twins play didn't think Mauer was better offensively. I just used my eyes and old time stats and said I saw something different. I showed how different people's eye tests might show different things for a variety of reasons. I posted earlier some of those reasons. Perception based on biases, for one.
I like Dozier better than Mauer. I have no reason to look for reasons to say Mauer is better.
The truth is what we are all looking for - here's also what I said -
"One thing is certain about numbers, you can make a case for just about anything. They can be helpful tools but you still really need to evalute players play during a game."
I don't dislike Mauer, but I don't think he was better than Dozier offensively last year. I just think stats can be as misleading as your eyes if used incorrectly.