I think the difference is that Hicks can be better, and should be. Doumit has no business being in LF, but Gardy put him there and he is who he is. Any player, but especially a really young one, ought to make the best of their talent, and even if they are underperforming they have to improve. Lots of stories of players who end their careers and people say what if they had tried harder, what if coaches hadn't let them get away with things because of their talent early in their career. Not saying that's the case with Hicks, but saying he's a better outfielder than Doumit so leave him alone seems like a pretty short-sighted approach to me.