Mlb.com strikes me as a basic aggregator. Boring, conservative, consensus. BA has the more depth and information, especially with lower ranked prospects. I think their flaw is they let personal cheeseballs get too much attention. Probably too much emphasis on tools as well. Law is good, but doesn't go all that deep in systems, and (for better or worse) he gets locked into an analysis and won't move from it. Sickels is quirky with some interesting nuggets, and I think he can unearth some people that slip through the other lists. He is especially good with pitchers. Fangraphs will have statistical finds that are missed by other lists, but I think their flaw is they elevate certain prospect profiles that statistically seems strong but are not actually good prospects (if that makes sense). This is a side conversation from Dozier, but I've been cranking through lists the last several days for my dynasty league. Doing some comparisons to previous years lists.