This is all well and good, but I think it misses the point. I don't think many here have any delusions that another 10-15 million spent in FA makes this team a playoff team. It certainly wouldn't hurt their luck, but the rub is more that additional talent opens more options than you can usually foresee even at the time of signing. Signing Marcum and Johnson to short term deals makes a lot of sense for a number of reasons, namely A) It replaces a bad player at a key position these are positions with no organizational depth at the top of their minor league system that should be feared as being blocked and c) Provides value and production at two positions that are usually high in demand. Even if these players never play more than a year for the Twins, they offer the team the option of not playing bad players or flipping these players for more value down the line. In other words, there is literally no downside whatsoever other than pocketed money for the Pohlads being spent on the team. The Pohlads, by the way, are already budgeting to pocket money normally, this is just icing on the cake. If a zero downside move like this one to potentially upgrade the team's overall talent level significantly is too much for this ownership to stomach, than I think I make take a similar approach with my spending dollars. I'm still a fan, but the money they'll get from me will be dramatically reduced. It's just not fair to ask of your fans what you aren't willing to do yourself. Everyone rushing to defend the "spend for the sake of spending" are essentially acknowledging a crappy product. Why would I invest in that crappy product if they won't?