To your first paragraph - I'm all about checking that behavior as well. Trolling and negativity online is now something that is a regular part of our technology instruction. My students had two separate lessons this year on appropriate conduct online. I don't think that issue has been raised in this thread because it's slightly off topic. What you raise is another branch of the toxicity of social media and one certainly worth caring about. It's not just about being wrong. Certainly it's a problem if we try and destroy people on social media and we're wrong. There is no going back and the damage is real. It's also about how the approach is more counter-productive than helpful. It's sledgehammer vs. chisel. Sure...you can use both, but which tool you use should be informed by the problem right? Take someone who is just genuinely confused about privilege: they have never had to confront it, they don't understand it, and they go on social media and pose a well-intentioned question. Does that person deserve the same treatment as some Tiki-torch wielding prick making Nazi salutes? I hope not. I would like to implore people to think these two situations require VERY different approaches. You can take a stand and try and help one person, the other probably needs to see a jail cell. Or some other serious consequence. And, much like you, I'm a parent. Nuance like this is crucial to good parenting and, really, changing thing socially has a lot of parallels. As a parent you have to "take a stand" many times a day. I would bet your stand doesn't look the same every time but is instead very thoughtful, nuanced, and tailored to the situation you're addressing. Why would we do anything less for dealing with subjects this dense and important?