Of course. But drafting based on holes in the overall organization, is a great strategy, since "Best" player available is pretty objective. I'd claim that figuring out who the best overall player is, is much harder than figuring out who the best LHSP or who the best C might be, because at a point you are starting to compare hitters with pitchers and that comparison is never valid. So what happens, is that teams that are going for the unicorn "BPA", ending up failing. And a big part of the problem is that "best" now vs. "best" at their peak, might be totally 2 different things. And if "best" player available now is a unicorn, "best" player at their peak is a flying rainbow kitten unicorn. However, the organizational deficiencies are much more concrete, and help people get focused on scouting hard 15 vs 500 players... http://images-cdn.9gag.com/images/thumbnail-facebook/13706967_1418881236.7876_u3amYT_n.jpg