I appreciate the review. As a Braves fan, I've had a lot of talks with fans who have been there, and as a writer, I've had talks with the team about some of the ideas that went into the stadium. The stadium has played as a hitter's park this year so far, but Freeman is not a great example as he's hit everywhere for a calendar year now as one of the 3-4 best hitters in the entire league. You did note the most notable thing to me that makes the park play as a hitter's park, which is the limited foul space (note that the most pitcher friendly parks in the league have little to do with their distance to the fences, but more with their amount of foul ground. For instance, Oakland's stadium is only 330 down both lines, but the amount of foul ground allows plenty of mi****s to be caught, preventing the opportunity to take advantage of those lines. I'd also note that no single player had any influence on the design of the park. The lack of foul ground had to do with the exterior of the ballpark and what ground was allotted in the (shady) deal with taxpayers. The Braves are building their organization around pitching, and they would have preferred more space, but that was not afforded them. All that said, Milwaukee among the best is surprising to me, especially if you've ever seen a game there when it's been raining.