Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

SwainZag

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,045

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by SwainZag

  1. SwainZag
    You are right, they NEED more options. I totally agree 100%. You take the field, I'll take the Twins. Pint of something Minnesota local as the bet
  2. SwainZag
    Agree completely about limiting their options. I would love to see them bring in more options, the more options and depth the better. All I am saying is why are we assuming that anyone they bring in is likely to be better than the options they have?
  3. SwainZag
    How do we know that? Why just assume that Smeltzer/Dobnak/Thorpe etc. can't put up a 4.75 FIP/ERA for 25 starts for a season?
  4. SwainZag
    My position is neither. Jake was not a free agent until after the qualifying offer day came. The previous poster claimed no teams offered him in those 10 days, which couldn't happen.
  5. SwainZag
    Odorizi was a member of the Twins until after he accepted or declined his qualifying offer. He could not be "bid" on until after that process was over.
  6. SwainZag
    Wins and losses are dependent on the team you are pitching for. Archer led the league in losses with 19 on a 94 loss Tampa team despite a 4.02 ERA and 3.81 FIP. Using a SP W/L record by itself is a pretty awful metric.
  7. SwainZag
    Just because they had interest in them didn't mean they were willing to pay whatever it takes to bring them in. This needs to be understood. Just because they might love someone for 1 or 2 years doesn't mean the same interest is there at 4 and 5 years.
  8. SwainZag
    Why would he sign the QO then? If he didn't want to be here he would have left.
  9. SwainZag
    I agree that's probably certainly on the table. I'm sure it was discussed before he accepted the QO as well. It wouldn't surprise me one bit for them to announce a 3 year or so deal tacked onto his 2020 QO salary. I also think we see at least 1 or 2 extensions before the arbitration hearings similar to last season.
  10. SwainZag
    How would a starter at the deadline beat the Yankees in the playoffs when the best offense in baseball only scored 7 runs in 3 games?
  11. SwainZag
    Or target means the trade market as well. The season doesn't start for 3 months. Target pitching does not mean "we will for sure sign a veteran free agent to multi-year massive contract." I want to come on here to discuss the Twins and this thread in general, what are the next options. We can discuss what happens next or drown out every thread with "the front office failed" "the front office lied" "fire everyone." The offseason isn't over, there is a lot of time to acquire a couple of players.
  12. SwainZag
    David Price is 34 years old and is owed 32M-32M-32M for the next 3 seasons and has missed heavy parts of the last 2 seasons. Taking all of that contract seems like a huge risk. I can't imagine they would take on Price unless Boston is covering at least a semi-decent portion of it.
  13. SwainZag
    I'm curious to know if the Royals would have lost the 2nd year would it have been worth it? 2 trips to the WS and zero titles? Since you cannot guarantee a championship, I would rather have a sustainable winning team who has a shot at the playoffs year in and year out without mortgaging the future. It takes more than adding a whole bunch of talent in 1 year to win a title.
  14. SwainZag
    The people who say hard pass on a guy like Ray is because of the contract. If you are going to give up the assets to trade for a player of his quality, you would like to have more control than a single year. Of course, a contract extension is always in the cards, it's nice knowing you have that control in the 1st place.
  15. SwainZag
    My mistake, the last time I looked the Astros turned down his team option and he was scheduled to go to arbitration....which looking again was an article from last offseason.
  16. SwainZag
    2019 Cishek: 2.95 ERA, 4.54 FIP, 8 K/9, 4.1 BB/9, WHIP 1.203 Age 33 2019 Kintzler: 2.68 ERA, 3.56 FIP, 7.6 K/9, 2.1 BB/9, WHIP 1.018 Age 35 2019 Harris: 1.50 ERA, 3.14 FIP, 9.3 K/9, 2.1 BB/9, WHIP .933 Age 35 2019 Hudson: 2.47 ERA, 3.97 FIP, 8.8 K/9, 3.3 BB/9, WHIP 1.137 Age 32 2019 Clippard: 2.90 ERA, 3.89 FIP, 9.3 K/9, 2.2 BB/9, WHIP .855 Age 34 What about comparing those numbers just screams it was a money move? Harris isn't a free agent. Hudson reportedly wants a multi-year deal. Directly from MLBtraderumors: Beyond those surface-level numbers, Clippard, 35 in February, excelled in a number of areas. He ranked in the game’s 98th percentile in terms of average exit velocity allowed, at a paltry 85 mph, and his opponents’ hard-hit rate (28.8 percent) landed in the 95th percentile among MLB hurlers. The .260 weighted on-base average (wOBA) to which he held opponents was also among the game’s best and was a near match for the .264 expected wOBA projected by Statcast. If he would have signed for $7.5M would you have thought this was a better signing? It's not always about the money. Looks on the surface like a steal for the Twins and a great guy to have added to the pen.
  17. SwainZag
    Just because it comes out that the team has interest in a guy doesn't mean that interest is strong enough to do whatever it takes to sign them from someone else.
  18. SwainZag
    I just like having the option. Gets rid of a little uncertainty and is a really low risk play for the team. He falls off a cliff, no biggie, you pay the $250K. He tosses another strong season.... you pick it up and is one less hole to fill. I just don't see the downside in it. :shrug:
  19. SwainZag
    And a big reason why the front office was over hauled.
  20. SwainZag
    Which players have been let go for making comments? Which players have had attitudes and were traded at the deadline? Where does this stuff come from?
  21. SwainZag
    The deal comes out to: 2020: $4.75M 2021: Team Option of $5M with a $250K buyout. http://www.startribune.com/reliever-sergio-romo-will-return-to-twins/566260782/ I dig the option for a 2nd year. Also, let's try and keep this thread about Sergio Romo and not what people think about the front office's other moves and non moves they have made this offseason.
  22. SwainZag
    The NFL and the MLB are very different. MLB contracts are often times fully guaranteed, where is the NFL contracts are not. There is also a salary cap in the NFL. I will not get into a Cousins debate with you because we obviously have different views on that as well. Cousins is pretty much in the Top 5 of every QB stat across the board this year. I don't know what else a lot of Viking fans want.
  23. SwainZag
    Why would we be upset not signing Porcello? Outside of being an innings eater, he is a fairly mediocre pitcher. 2/3 seasons his FIP was above 4.60, his BB/9 and K/9 were the worst in his career last year and he had an xFIP of 5.14. I get it that's he's only 31 and is a bounce back candidate, but I would say there is a better way of spending $10M dollars.
  24. SwainZag
    It's December. If the team looks like this in late March, I will agree with you but it's far from that. The Twins won 29 more games than Chicago last season. Adding Grandal and Mazara puts them at a lock huh?
  25. SwainZag
    I'd like to see you back up the Twins having tendency to dump players at an alarming rate and show some examples of players who think they have no stability with the team.
×
×
  • Create New...