Studies have shown that teams that overspend at 2B, SS and 3B tend to generally consider themselves in it to win it. The Twins have spoken loud and clear that they aren't in it, with their pocketbooks; they obviously haven't felt comfortable taking on that additional salary risk, and hence the repeated weakness in the Twins infield. The Hardy/Nishioka "imbecilic" (wow, kind of insensitive on your part?) swap, according to the reporting done at the time was obviously a double-mis-evaluation and a cost-cutting move, combined with some wacky new marketing scheme to expand the Twins brand to Asia and possibly entice another prospect or two to consider signing with the Twins. Besides this failure to refute the facts in your post, you also neglected to mention the other areas of cost-cutting which has occurred in the last few years- Valencia undeservedly and practically accidentally out of desperation handed the 3B job, the continual mess at 2B, a CF w/ a pop-gun arm and bat playing out of place in a power/corner OF spot, the cavalier annual casting off of proven relievers- only to then, out of sheer desperation, hold an open tryout in 2012 ST. This isn't "evildoing" on the Twins part (not sure why you continue to go there), it's business decisions, right or wrong, based on risk assessment and analysis trying to meet an expected rate of return.