True, but this ignores the larger number of absolutely, positively should have been an outs that aren't called errors. Unless there is absolute consistency among scorers (which the scorers will of course say there is), you are judging players by a minority of plays that are categorized arbitrarily. It's a bit akin to defending Byron Buxton by showing the future stars who got off to rough starts, while ignoring the larger number of guys who got off to rough starts and stayed rough forever.