I have to say that there is a slight flaw in the system. I think the flaw comes with the loss of the draft pick. Correct me if I am wrong but, in Lohse's situation, are the top 10 (?) picks protected so if a team in the top 10 picks of the draft sign Lohse they would lose their second round pick. Out of the teams picking in the top 10, maybe Boston would be the one team that would be alright with losing their pick. I think Cleveland lost their second round pick with the signing of Bourn. To me, this is where the flaw comes in. More often than not a team in the top 10 picks are in a rebuilding mode so drafting talent trumps the signing of a guy like Lohse. Is Lohse a good pitcher? I think so. Does it make sense for an organization like the Twins or Royals or Pirates or Rockies to sign him and lose a pick? I don't think so. Look at Seattle and San Diego. They are picking 12 and 13. Does it make sense to sign Lohse and lose that pick? I know if the Twins were picking there I wouldn't be happy if they lost their first round pick. I haven't heard what Boars wants teams to cough up for Lohse for but for him to remain unsigned, I am guessing it is outragous. That in itself prices most teams out of the market. Kudos to the all the teams for not buying what Boras is selling. In my opinion, I would rather roll the dice and take a guy like Barrios in the draft who may or may not become a solid MLB pitcher that sign Lohse who at this point really wouldn't make our roster that much better. The flip side to that though if we would have made a splash in free agency and sign a couple of quality pitchers, then maybe signing Lohse would be worth it.