The Mariners payroll jumped from 18th in 1999 and increased to one of only 7 teams over 100 million in 2007. The Bavasi period of Mariners history was aggressive in my opinion. Bringing in Beltre, Sexson, Washburn, Ibanez, Silva and Matt Lawton among others. I think it was a shift in their approach. It doesn't compare to the Yankees free Spending but I think the shift was significant and I think they are still trying to dig their way out of it. This was off the top of my head... In Hind sight... The Astros may be a poor example. The moves they made did produce a pennant in the 2005. I was just remembering a period of bringing in some bigger names. Pettite, Clemens, Tejada, Carlos Lee. Scratch the Astro's. 100 Million is a tough bench mark. Not many teams were over 100 million prior to 2008 and I think the lower payroll teams were lower overall. Anyway, It was a poorly worded Thread starter by me. I was thinking about these teams and I was wondering if a parallel could be drawn with the Twins jump in payroll with the opening of Target Field. Granted... If you spend money and make good decisions... it works out great but... If you don't... Did it put the Mariners, Cubs and Mets in a hole? Does anyone feel the Twins changed their approach with the opening of Target Field? If So... Did it put us in a hole?