What's wrong with the media guide comment? One thing is that if it's taken at face value, it's an admission that Jim Pohlad knows virtually nothing about the management structure of major league baseball teams. And that doesn't bode well for the selection of a new GM. The greater problem is that it gives a very strong impression that even after years as 'acting owner', Jim Pohlad still thinks of the Twins as a lucrative but troublesome estate bequeathed to him by his father. For me, it makes Jim Pohlad look even more like what he often has over the years: a son who inherited the family farm despite not actively working it while growing up, or even liking the idea of farming. The farm has made money in the hands of a capable and trusted farm hand who worked for dad and now oversees the entire operation. But lately the old hand has let things slide a bit and battled some health issues, and it's time for a replacement. But because he's never taken much of an interest in the farm, the son finds himself at a loss when trying to hire a new manager because he doesn't know what the manager or the guys he hires actually do. In other words, Jim Pohlad's comment essentially amounts to admitting that be it farming or baseball, all he knows is what he learned from watching Field of Dreams. And rightly or wrongly, human nature dictates that a baseball forum is going to be filled with fans who find it appalling the Jim Pohlad could appear to care so little about a sport and a team that we imagine, were we in his shoes, would grow from a part-time passion into a full-time occupation and obsession. That's what's wrong with the media guide comment.