For this revolutionary opener idea - aren't we just copying what Tampa Bay did? A real revolutionary idea would be to look at the pitching talent you have in your system and design the best plan that works best for their skill set, health and temperament. For example, you could have 3 starters if you have 3 good ones, 4 longer stretch pitchers that would go 4-5 innings each and split the next 2 starts and fill-in for off days, then have 6 "relief pitchers". 2 of the relief pitchers could be a designated opener and designated closer. Or another approach is to say what is the ulitimate best approach and develop/acquire talent to fit that approach. If the first inning is most important with the toughest lineup order and setting the tone for the game - then you would want your best pitchers opening the game. Would you want Berrios starting off every other game and pitching an inning or two? Some pitchers are better cut out for closing than others because they can handle the pressure of that situation - some better at pitching in the middle, starting a game, etc... In our openers so far, we have started Moya - who might be what our 11th or 12th best pitcher? And then May - who is one of our better pitchers but who has been injured in the past switching between starting and relieving. I realize starting a game is different than starting and pitching 5-6 innings but that is all I could think of last night - hope he doesn't get hurt from this trial and moving him in different roles. If we are going to be creative let's be creative in a smart way that fits our talent.