When I think of Falvey, I also think of Levine, and vice versa. I'm not sure if that is a good thing or a bad thing. On one hand, you want a front office working together and 'being on the same page'. On the other hand, it's good to have multiple view points. If there is going to be a change it has to come from the Pohlads, and they have not demonstrated a great sense of urgency in making changes, especially if it might affect the bottom line. I ask myself this question:
Would the Pohlads risk $15 million to have a decent 'shot' at making the playoffs? Or would they rather not risk any revenue for a playoff possibility?