Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
  • Posts

    32,665
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    328

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brock Beauchamp

  1. Rickey don't like seeing Rickey compared to prospects.
  2. Rickey was the greatest leadoff hitter of all time and it's not even close. He's easily one of the greatest players of all time, as evidenced by his appearance in so many statistical categories we prize today (OBP, BB) along with the stolen bases and 19th all-time in career bWAR despite being a "meh" defender. We'd be more than stoked if Buxton turned out anything like Rickey Henderson. Henderson played in the wrong era. He spend the latter part of his career in the homer-crazed late 80s and before we realized that not making an out was so bloody important in baseball. If he played today, he'd be considered the best player in baseball by a country mile.
  3. I've heard this argument made a few times but I think the hit you take from moving a capable hitter down to the nine slot more than offsets any gain you get from extending the "table setting". Moving a guy from #2-#9 in the lineup costs him 60-80 plate appearances in a season (too lazy to do the math on that but that number is relatively accurate).
  4. Yeah, I'm fine with Buxton starting off in the leadoff spot but I hope he becomes more than that at some point.
  5. Sure, but then you're sacrificing 50-70 plate appearances in a season by taking one of your better hitters and moving them to the ninth spot in the order.
  6. I agree that lineup construction isn't a huge factor in scoring runs but saying the leadoff hitter only leads off once and therefore power doesn't matter is a bit misleading. Hitting homeruns out of the leadoff spot is also impacted by the probability of the 7-9 hitters being on base during the leadoff hitter's plate appearance versus the probability of the 9-2 hitters being on base during the leadoff hitter's plate appearance. Obviously, any properly constructed lineup will see the 9-2 hitters being on base more often than the 7-9 hitters.
  7. Sure, but in a perfect situation you'd rather have that guy batting 3-5 when it's more likely that runners are on base when it happens.
  8. I agree that if Hicks can maintain a .341 OBP, that's a good leadoff guy. I'm more than a little skeptical Hicks can maintain a .341 OBP in regular appearances.
  9. Given Buxton's toolset, I'm hoping he forces his way into the 2 or 3 spot, not leadoff.
  10. I lean toward Dozier. I think he'll continue to be a .730-.750 OPS second basemen but have a nagging feeling that many of those homers will turn into doubles this season. You don't want a leadoff guy jacking a bunch of solo shots but doubles are a good way to set the table. Plus, he can take a walk and his lack of BA won't hurt as much if there's nobody on base in front of him (ie. missed opportunities to advance runners on base).
  11. I mostly agree but I don't believe Hunter is taking 500 ABs away from anyone on the Twins who will be on the next contending team. If things go right down on the farm with Rosario and/or Buxton, Hunter might take ~200 ABs away from one of them (provided Hunter is even healthy July-September). The only person who might be on the Twins the next time they contend is Hicks and if the Twins want to play Hicks right now, nothing is stopping them from doing that.
  12. I prefer to bury my head in the sand until that becomes an undeniable reality.
  13. The Astros and Twins share several traits: young teams, loads of potential, good farm systems, and bad records. Fangraphs scribe August Fagerstrom compares two young outfielders who each made an impression on their respective teams last season: George Springer and Oswaldo Arcia. Comparing George Springer to Oswaldo Arcia As pitchers and catchers prepare to report over the weekend, Twins Daily users continue to post their experiences from Fort Myers as the baseball season begins to ramp up in Florida and Arizona. Hammond Happenings Fangraphs loves the Twins farm system and ranked eight (!) Twins prospects on their top 200 list, though debate broke out over the omissions of Nick Burdi and Eddie Rosario. Twins fans are greedy when it comes to prospect rankings. Fangraphs Top 200 Prospects Derek Wetmore from ESPN 1500 wrote an article asking who should be the next player to have his number retired by the Twins. Should it be Torii Hunter? Jim Kaat? Brad Radke? Give your us your take! Twins Retired Numbers In Vikings News: Mike Freeman from Bleacher Report wrote an article blasting Johnny Manziel and praising Teddy Bridgewater. With every passing day, it seems more like the Browns took a bullet for the Vikings. Think About if We had Drafted Bridgewater In Wild News: Devan Dubnyk has been a revelation for the Wild. It turns out that his renaissance in the net may not be fueled by luck but is a result of new head-trajectory technology employed during the offseason. A must-read article. Dubnyk's New Technique
  14. There seems to be a growing portion of the Twins fan base that would pay him a good chunk to play somewhere else.
  15. You mean the guy who was the Twins' best starter last season and the guy who just signed a massive contract extension to stay in Minnesota? You think that guy is going to be the Opening Day starter? Yeah, me too. Hughes' right arm could be in a cast and there'd still be a 75% chance he gets the Opening Day start in 2015.
  16. Trading for KG feels a lot like rearranging deck chairs. I don't understand the point.
  17. Neo's pitch-framing statistics are off the charts. Also spoon-bending.
  18. Oh, sorry. I thought the title read "Neoscouting".
  19. http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--T15tPuhm--/18lq3gianriisjpg.jpg
  20. I'd take the Cubs system right now... But I'd take the Cubs system only if it came with the Cubs payroll ceiling as well. Epstein can go buy the pitchers he needs to succeed and he knows it. Ryan has flexibility but not that kind of flexibility. And it's okay to say the Cubs system has more high ceiling players without slighting what Ryan and his scouts have done with the Twins. They're both very good systems.
  21. At least my parents only did it once.
  22. That's the height of ridiculous. It basically breaks the scale of ridiculous.
×
×
  • Create New...