You seem to believe I'm giving the police and prosecution a pass. I'm not. They made mistakes and it appears they were some pretty big mistakes. The only thing I've refuted about your reasonable doubt claims is that it's basically impossible to establish whether the reasonable doubt threshold was met because the documentary didn't gloss over the prosecution's case, it skipped the prosecution's case entirely. I can't say with any kind of certainty whether reasonable doubt was met when I didn't get to see the actual presentation of the case (not even a little bit of it). And that loops us back around to the obviously slanted aspect of the documentary. Why didn't they address the prosecution's case? Why did they omit important details from the case entirely? These are reasonable questions and the documentary should have addressed them. The documentary's failure to do so makes me question other aspects of the case that were shown to us. Maybe that's unfair, maybe it's not... But if I catch someone trying to deceive me in some way, I'm going to start reviewing everything they say with skepticism (just as I view everything that came from the Manitowoc Sheriff's department with skepticism). For the umpteenth time, I don't know whether Avery is guilty. I suspect he is but that's only suspicion, not fact. The police did some, at best, unscrupulous things. Whether that was borne from malice or incompetence, I do not know. At worst, they're entirely corrupt and planted evidence. Lots of question marks, very few answers.