Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Why You Shouldn't Lump Anthony DeSclafani In With Other Injured Twins Pitching Acquisitions


    Cody Christie

    Anthony DeSclafani will probably never throw a pitch in a Minnesota Twins uniform, but his acquisition was different from other cases in which the team traded for pitchers who had major subsequent injury problems.

    Image courtesy of Darren Yamashita-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    On Saturday, the Twins announced that Anthony DeSclafani will miss all of the 2024 season (and some of 2025) after undergoing a flexor tendon surgery. It’s the latest setback for DeSclafani, in a career marred by injuries. He missed the 2017 season while dealing with a UCL strain. In 2022, he was limited to fewer than 19 innings because of an ankle injury. A right flexor strain also ended his 2023 season last July. The Twins knew there was a good chance of this outcome when trading for him, which makes this situation distinct from other recent trades.

    Minnesota acquired DeSclafani as part of the trade with Seattle for Jorge Polanco. The Twins also received reliever Justin Topa and prospects Gabriel Gonzalez and Darren Bowen. The Mariners added $4 million to the $4 million they had been paid by the Giants, reducing DeSclafani’s salary from $12 million to $4 million. González is considered a borderline top-100 prospect, Topa was a quality setup man last season, and Bowen is a recent late-round pick who is more of a flyer. The value in the trade was always likely to come from those players, and not from DeSclafani. Seattle needed the payroll flexibility to add Polanco’s contract, which required the Twins to take on a less desirable contract. It was the cost of doing business in this trade, and not a result of the front office targeting an injured player.

    Some fans and local media members are pointing fingers at the front office for acquiring another injured pitcher. While that was true, the Twins’ front office was making this trade for the other players involved and not for the starting pitcher who became injured. There are multiple reasons the team continues to trade for injured pitchers, and the Twins aren’t the only club dealing with this issue. Minnesota has made some bad trades under the current regime, but there is still time for the Polanco trade to work out in their favor.

    Derek Falvey has attempted to add depth to the roster in recent seasons. Last season, the club traded Luis Arráez for Pablo López to add starting depth, pushing Bailey Ober to Triple-A. The Twins wanted DeSclafani’s addition to push Louie Varland to St. Paul to begin the year, but that won’t happen. Minnesota’s pitching depth is already being tested, and the club hopes the current rotation will stay healthy to begin the year. 

    The problem here is that the front office was forced by ownership to cut $30 million from the payroll. Minnesota needed to find payroll savings, and one way to do that was by trading a veteran like Polanco. It was also frustrating for fans to watch the top free-agent starting pitchers sign below-market deals. Blake Snell, the reigning NL Cy Young Award winner, signed with the Giants for two years and $62 million. Jordan Montgomery, who helped Texas win the World Series, signed a one-year, $25 million contract with the Diamondbacks. The Twins could have fit either player into their payroll if they were at last year's $160 million total. Ownership forced this type of trade, which led to adding a starter with a high injury risk. 

    Falvey and Thad Levine have shown they are not afraid to take risks, and sometimes, that comes with a chance to be burned. For every bad Tyler Mahle trade, the team can hope for a franchise-altering López-type deal. DeSclafani doesn’t fit into any of these categories, because the front office didn't proactively target him. The Mariners forced a salary dump to get the other pieces in the trade, and that makes him different.


    Should DeSclafani be included among the other pitchers who were injured for the Twins? Leave a comment to start the discussion.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    4 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    I am even more curious as to if you are willing to actually explain your position.  I just seems fair that if you are going to be this critical that you be willing to explain the problem with this approach with some specificity.

    I, and many other posters, have explained to you the problems with your "analysis".  It's clear you are extremely invested in your narrative and nothing anyone says is going to change your mind.  That's totally fine, you do you.  But I'm not going to engage any further.  Good luck to you on your intellectual journey and remember:  there's nothing more powerful than an open mind.  

    1 hour ago, Woof Bronzer said:

    I, and many other posters, have explained to you the problems with your "analysis".  It's clear you are extremely invested in your narrative and nothing anyone says is going to change your mind.  That's totally fine, you do you.  But I'm not going to engage any further.  Good luck to you on your intellectual journey and remember:  there's nothing more powerful than an open mind.  

    Insisting the analysis is cherry picking is not an explanation.  It's a statement.  I simply asked you to offer an explanation as to what set of data would make more sense than to use the best teams these organizations have ever fielded and look at how many players were acquired via every potential acquisition method.    Show me where someone explained what set of data would be better to show how the best teams have been constructed.  Now that you have been asked to explain what makes this data set "cherry picking", you want to quit.  This does not require a lot of effort.  Tell me what specific data set would best facilitate determining the best acquisition strategies.  I used 5 years from the 3 teams with by far the most successful seasons since the turn of the century and the 3 best years from the next tier of terms of success.  Every potential method was totaled for each team.  

    So, are you going to run in hide or are you willing to support the statements you made so ardently?   

    On 4/4/2024 at 6:11 PM, Major League Ready said:

    This is your opinion of who he starts over.   If the twins agreed with you, Polanco would still be here.  They don't want a full-time DH and neither do most teams.  And, if they wanted a full-time DH, Martinez would have made much more sense.  They would have a better hitter, a good RP, and two good prospects.

    In addition, he is an inferior choice over Kirilloff against RHP and Inferior to Santana against LHP.  The only time he would not be an inferior choice is at DH.

    Quoting for display purposes

    On 4/2/2024 at 2:34 PM, Major League Ready said:

    This is true only if the twins were willing to devote a roster to a player who is primarily a DH.  Most teams don't want to devote a spot to a DH and if the twins were to do so Martinez made more sense. 

    Who does he replace in the field?  Julien is the superior and cheaper player at 2B against RHP.  Farmer is the superior player a 2B against LHP.   Lewis the much better player at 3B.  Kirilloff is the equivalent player at 1B against RHP and much cheaper.  Santana is the superior player at 1B against LHP.  So, when is he the preferred starter?

    There is also the issue of having room on the roster for Brooks Lee.

    Quoting for display purposes. 

    4 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    Quoting for display purposes. 

    That post was very clearly directed at if there was anytime other than DH where Polanco would be the best choice.   It's a big reach to say this suggests that Santana was justification for getting rid of Polanco.  

    2 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    That post was very clearly directed at if there was anytime other than DH where Polanco would be the best choice.   It's a big reach to say this suggests that Santana was justification for getting rid of Polanco.  

    No it really isn't.  

    Since Santana's place on the roster is easily replaced by Polanco and you are claiming there is no place for Polanco to play other than DH. 

     

    6 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    No it really isn't.  

    Since Santana's place on the roster is easily replaced by Polanco and you are claiming there is no place for Polanco to play other than DH. 

     

    Apparently, you know what I meant to communicate better than I do myself.  First, Polanco is not a 1B.  Even if they put him there,  Kirilloff is the better option against RHP and Santana better (historically) against LHP.  So, he is not playing 1B.  His only option is 3B if Lewis / Lee, and Correa are injured at the same time.  Of course, that happened but what are the odds?  The team is pretty much cooked if that situation persists and keeping Polanco would not come remotely close to making this team a contender.

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    Apparently, you know what I meant to communicate better than I do myself.  First, Polanco is not a 1B.  Even if they put him there,  Kirilloff is the better option against RHP and Santana better (historically) against LHP.  So, he is not playing 1B.  His only option is 3B if Lewis / Lee, and Correa are injured at the same time.  Of course, that happened but what are the odds?  The team is pretty much cooked if that situation persists and keeping Polanco would not come remotely close to making this team a contender.

     

    What are the odds? I don't know but I've stated it over and over and over again. With the injury history of Lewis, Buxton and Kirilloff the odds would have to be higher than normal... whatever they are. 

    Here's a post from February having a pleasant honest conversation with Jorgenswest. 

      On 2/14/2024 at 12:18 PM, jorgenswest said:

    The Vazquez decision was made when the budget wasn’t as tight and Jeffers was shaky. I can give them a pass on that. I also think the voice of that veteran catcher in those meeting with the pitchers and pitching staff was valuable to not only Jeffers but the pitchers and the coaches. It is hard to accept the other three and I hope they are willing cut their losses with any/all of the three early in the season.

    Need a right handed short side platoon bat at 2B? They have Martin, Helman, Prato, Goodrum and even Lee all inexpensive. Why not give Julien a few more starts against a lefty and bat him 9th? The way pitchers are used he may only need see that lefty once and certainly not three times. 

    Need a short side platoon bat at 1B? Why not try Miranda first followed by Severino? Give Kirilloff some starts against a lefty at the bottom of the order at times.

    I would have combined those dollars to get an everyday bat or an upgrade to Varland in the rotation.

     

    Short side platoon addendum.

    Is it wise to have multiple bats whose value is in a short side platoon? The Earl Weaver platoon days of 15 rostered position players and starters pitching 7 or more innings are long gone. You can’t carry a Benny Ayala on your roster most of the season and have him face a right handed pitcher in just 9 plate appearances. Everyone on the roster needs to able to hit right handed pitching just as every bullpen arm is going to see high leverage. 

    Expand  

    Great post as usual.

    Being a GM is a tough job and I'm not willing to hang them for the decisions that they make... after all sometimes these 1 year guys have good years and are worth the money.

    However... the failure rate has become high in my opinion and the most simple thing that you can do is not let them double down on the mistake. Spending the money is a mistake but the money spent can't hurt you unless you make the bigger mistake of letting the money spent mistake step to the plate continuously or take the mound continuously. The bottom line to me is pretty simple. A vet on an expiring contract has to perform at the very least average because you can find at least average or close to average waiting in the wings below.  

    Agreed on the short side Platoon. The true short sider (Garlick for example) is a waste of a roster spot. In the case of Farmer... I'll bet anyone money that he will face more right handers than left handers this year. You can set up these pretty platoons in the off-season... they will be blown apart before April is over due to injury or poor performance... and in order to keep the platoon integrity you are signing Luplow and signing Luplow over promoting Larnach for example because of short side splits is just going to kill Larnach. 




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments

×
×
  • Create New...