Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Should Christian Vázquez Be the Twins' Leadoff Hitter?


    Eric Blonigen

    As the Twins navigate the dog days of summer, they have been beset by injuries, and Rocco Baldelli has needed to get creative with roster management. With just over 40 games to play, it's important to find strategic tweaks that can increase the odds of winning even slightly.  With this in mind, I present to you: Christian Vázquez, leadoff hitter.

    Image courtesy of © Jordan Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Overall, Christian Vázquez has not been the hitter the Twins hoped for when signing him to a three-year, $30 million deal prior to the 2023 season. In 2023, he was 35% worse than league-average as a hitter. This season, he has been marginally better, just 31% worse than average. This has led to bitterness among the fanbase, and there have been calls to trade or DFA him for a season and a half. These calls may be premature, however, as in one key situation, Vázquez has been an above-average hitter. The key? Leading off an inning.

    So far this season, Vázquez has come to the dish with the bases empty 119 times. During those plate appearances, he has a .728 OPS. He has struck out just 18% of the time, walked 4%, and has a .257 batting average, even with a tepid .279 BABIP. All of that is good for a 104 wRC+. So, Christian Vázquez has been a better-than-average hitter, with the bases empty. Are you surprised?

    In low-leverage situations, even beyond hitting leadoff, 33% of Vázquez’s contact is classified as hard-hit. Some 44% of the time, he hits the ball up the middle. When he hits the ball well, he uses the whole field.

    image.png

    Let’s compare this to other situations. When Vázquez bats with at least one runner on, his OPS craters to .475, with a batting average of just .190. He strikes out more frequently, 22% of the time. With a wRC+ of just 30, he’s been basically unusable with men on base. With runners in scoring position, his results are even worse, to the tune of a .153 batting average, a 25% strikeout rate, and a wRC+ of 4. Just terrible.

    In medium-leverage situations, his hard-hit rate falls slightly, to 28%, and in high-leverage spots, this drops to just 13.6%. Looking at his spray charts by leverage, in high leverage, he’s going the other way 41% of the time. The quality of this oppo contact has been quite poor - when he goes the other way, he either tops the ball or hits it softly.

    Topped.png.8d9d20bdd167e7b131f201df3fefaeec.png

    So, something about the pressure of the moment alters his timing, approach, and results--or it changes how opposing pitchers approach him, and he's not able to succeed against the different set of things he sees in those spots. Basically, when it matters most, he loses the ability to make valuable contact with the ball.

    Before you play the small-sample-size card, there are two things to consider. Last season, his batting average with runners on was .192 and his OPS was .539 — good for a 52 wRC+, and similar results to this year. So, this is at least a two-season problem. Over this span, his cumulative WPA is -4.1. Second, yes, his BABIP is lower when runners are on, at .234 and lower still with runners in scoring position at .191, suggesting that some positive regression is in order. However, due to his approach with men on, he won’t regress as much as one would expect.

    Overall, the story this data tells is that Christian Vázquez is likely trying to do too much when it matters most, and the problem may be mental. The solution? Take the pressure off. Let him hit leadoff, against lefties. Late in games, if they're trailing and need offense, they can always pinch-hit for Vázquez. Ryan Jeffers, to name the obvious candidate for such duty, is hitting .245/.318/.42 with runners on base, and he owns an .812 OPS in high-leverage situations.

    If Vázquez is capable of being a solid hitter in at least some situations, the Twins would be well-served to maximize his (limited) hitting prowess. Slotting him in atop the order needn't mean that he gets the most plate appearances on a given night; it can just mean putting him in the best possible position to succeed. They (and you) just might be surprised at the results.


    What do you think? Will hitting Vázquez leadoff maximize his hitting ability? Will it lead to positive outcomes for the Twins? Comment below to start the discussion!

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Taking the idea seriously...NO.

    A hot streak doesn't improve his career hitting ability or suddenly add speed to his game to help him advance and score.

    He's an outstanding catcher and he's been hot for a month. Jeffers is a good catcher, a generally better hitter, and capable of exploding again at any moment. And Vazquez is capable of going in to a funk at any moment.

    The whole idea is a nit laughable, and a borderline insult to Castro.

    Just, NO, keep him where he's at and enjoy his hot streak.

    22 hours ago, LyleCole said:

    Only a satirist would propose a hitter with a .257 OBP for the season and .303 for his career as the leadoff hitter.

    As Bill James, the father of all of the modern analytics demonstrated, the critical thing to scoring runs is to get runners on base, particularly the person who leads off the inning.  THe best OBP players should be the leadoff hitter and the clean up hitter.  The concept of having your best hitter bat 3rd I think is wrong even though most managers do it.  James thought it should actually be the power hitter in the lineup that has a lot of strikeouts batting before your best hitter in the cleanup spot,  That could generate a lot more good pitches to hit because they would not want to put runners on ahead of your best hitter.  

    Also, your worst hitter should hit 8th, rather than 9th.  The 9th hitter should be in position to set up the top of the order if they reach base.

    I think if I was doing a lineup for the Twins  it would be 

    Correa-MIranda-Buxton-Lewis-Wallner-Jeffers-Kepler-Larnach-Castro

    Since June 1st he's hitting .290/.328/.533, not sure why stats from 3+ months ago are all that relevant. 

    13 minutes ago, CCHOF5yearstoolate said:

    Since June 1st he's hitting .290/.328/.533, not sure why stats from 3+ months ago are all that relevant. 

    Since August 13th Kyle Farmer is hitting 1.000/1.000/4.000

     

    Not sure why chopping up stats and then cherry picking small sample sizes is all that relevant. 

    hey guys..not to worry! Vazquez will never be the Twins lead-off hitter but the topic did give some a chance to reinforce the mean-ness that is still this forum. For others, the comments were civil and realistic.

    Baseball is a very unpredictable game sometimes. For most the season Gunnar Henderson was O's lead-off hitter, despite his power and his propensity to 'k'. Finally after a slump he was replaced at the top by a most unlikely choice..Cowser. This rookie was in a prolonged batting funk with BA hovering between .210-.220 and a ton of k's.  So what happened? Cowser fan off a long hitting streak and raised his average by around .30 points, while doing what a lead-off hitter is supposed to do. Amazed me for sure. Sometimes you just can't figure things out. As for Gunnar, his power has mostly disappeared, but he is hitting again.

    Who have been MLB's purest lead-off hitters? Guess I'd start with Ricky Henderson. You fellas add to the list.

    8 hours ago, USAFChief said:

    Since August 13th Kyle Farmer is hitting 1.000/1.000/4.000

     

    Not sure why chopping up stats and then cherry picking small sample sizes is all that relevant. 

    There's no way you're trying to compare a 2 month sample size to a 1 day sample size, right?

    I'm not defending batting him leadoff, but it's silly to use his full season stats when he changed his swing mechanics in June and has a respectable OBP in a large enough sample size to conclude that he's been much better lately. 

    I don't think it's that crazy to say his production from the last 2 months is far more relevant than his stat line from April & May when considering changing his position in the lineup today. 

    12 hours ago, CCHOF5yearstoolate said:

    Since June 1st he's hitting .290/.328/.533, not sure why stats from 3+ months ago are all that relevant. 

    LOL.   There is a strong tendency for players to revert to the mean.   Christian Vazquez has been in the major leagues for 10 years.  He has hit over 280 in 2 of those seasons (2017, 2020).  He is a career 255 hitter with a lifetime 303 OBP.   Moving him to the leadoff hitter based on this small in season sample would be foolish.

    But then, they led off a guy with a 294 OBP today.

    1 hour ago, LyleCole said:

    LOL.   There is a strong tendency for players to revert to the mean.   Christian Vazquez has been in the major leagues for 10 years.  He has hit over 280 in 2 of those seasons (2017, 2020).  He is a career 255 hitter with a lifetime 303 OBP.   Moving him to the leadoff hitter based on this small in season sample would be foolish.

    But then, they led off a guy with a 294 OBP today.

    It would really be nice if y'all read what was written and put words in my comments. I don't want him in the leadoff spot. Is that clear enough? 

    What I am saying is that referring to stats from April & May, or the rest of his career, when you can see with your eyes how well he's performed recently is a silly way to evaluate the current lineup. Would you have said that Joey Gallo should have been leading off in late May when he had the highest OBP of any qualified batter on the team? For some reason I doubt it....

    Vazquez has been hitting very well for 2 months now. Sorry if that fact offends you. 

    18 hours ago, CCHOF5yearstoolate said:

    It would really be nice if y'all read what was written and put words in my comments. I don't want him in the leadoff spot. Is that clear enough? 

    What I am saying is that referring to stats from April & May, or the rest of his career, when you can see with your eyes how well he's performed recently is a silly way to evaluate the current lineup. Would you have said that Joey Gallo should have been leading off in late May when he had the highest OBP of any qualified batter on the team? For some reason I doubt it....

    Vazquez has been hitting very well for 2 months now. Sorry if that fact offends you. 

    Short term trends in baseball are essentially meaningless.   

    6 hours ago, LyleCole said:

    Short term trends in baseball are essentially meaningless.   

    2 months isn't short term in baseball such that it is unusable. He made a mechanical change and has seen stark improvement in every conceivable stat. Ignoring that is foolish. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...